Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy with or without CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR+/HER2- early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Frontiers in Pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.3389/fphar.2024.1438288
Zhihao Zhang, Xin Zhao, Jie Chen
{"title":"Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy with or without CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR+/HER2- early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Zhihao Zhang, Xin Zhao, Jie Chen","doi":"10.3389/fphar.2024.1438288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundThe combination of cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors and endocrine therapy is the standard treatment for patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer. However, the role of CDK4/6 inhibitors in early breast cancer remains controversial.MethodsThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy versus endocrine therapy alone in patients with HR+, HER2- early breast cancer. A systematic review of Cochrane, PubMed and EMBASE databases was conducted. The efficacy endpoints of adjuvant therapy were invasive disease-free survival (IDFS), overall survival (OS) and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS). The efficacy endpoint included complete cell cycle arrest (CCCA) and complete pathologic response (PCR) with neoadjuvant therapy. Grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were assessed as safety outcomes.ResultsEight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the study. CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy showed a significant improvement in IDFS (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.68–0.97, <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.024), but not DRFS (HR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.56–1.29, <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.106) or OS (HR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.77–1.19, <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.692) in adjuvant therapy. In the neoadjuvant therapy setting, CDK4/6 inhibitors improved CCCA compared with the control group (RR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.33–3.26, <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.001). The risk of 3/4 grade AEs increased significantly with the addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors to endocrine therapy.ConclusionThe addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR+/HER2- early breast cancer patients significantly improved IDFS in adjuvant therapy and CCCA in neoadjuvant. However, CDK4/6 inhibitors also showed significant toxicities during therapy.Systematic Review Registration:Identifier CRD42024530704.","PeriodicalId":12491,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2024.1438288","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundThe combination of cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors and endocrine therapy is the standard treatment for patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer. However, the role of CDK4/6 inhibitors in early breast cancer remains controversial.MethodsThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy versus endocrine therapy alone in patients with HR+, HER2- early breast cancer. A systematic review of Cochrane, PubMed and EMBASE databases was conducted. The efficacy endpoints of adjuvant therapy were invasive disease-free survival (IDFS), overall survival (OS) and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS). The efficacy endpoint included complete cell cycle arrest (CCCA) and complete pathologic response (PCR) with neoadjuvant therapy. Grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were assessed as safety outcomes.ResultsEight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the study. CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy showed a significant improvement in IDFS (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.68–0.97, P = 0.024), but not DRFS (HR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.56–1.29, P = 0.106) or OS (HR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.77–1.19, P = 0.692) in adjuvant therapy. In the neoadjuvant therapy setting, CDK4/6 inhibitors improved CCCA compared with the control group (RR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.33–3.26, P = 0.001). The risk of 3/4 grade AEs increased significantly with the addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors to endocrine therapy.ConclusionThe addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR+/HER2- early breast cancer patients significantly improved IDFS in adjuvant therapy and CCCA in neoadjuvant. However, CDK4/6 inhibitors also showed significant toxicities during therapy.Systematic Review Registration:Identifier CRD42024530704.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用或不使用CDK4/6抑制剂对HR+/HER2-早期乳腺癌进行辅助治疗和新辅助治疗:系统综述和荟萃分析
背景细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6(CDK4/6)抑制剂与内分泌治疗的联合应用是激素受体阳性(HR+)/HER2阴性(HER2-)晚期乳腺癌患者的标准治疗方法。本研究旨在评估 CDK4/6 抑制剂联合内分泌治疗与单纯内分泌治疗对 HR+、HER2- 早期乳腺癌患者的疗效和安全性。研究人员对 Cochrane、PubMed 和 EMBASE 数据库进行了系统回顾。辅助治疗的疗效终点为无侵袭性疾病生存期(IDFS)、总生存期(OS)和无远处复发生存期(DRFS)。疗效终点包括新辅助治疗的完全细胞周期停滞(CCCA)和完全病理反应(PCR)。3/4级不良事件(AEs)被评估为安全性结果。在辅助治疗中,CDK4/6抑制剂联合内分泌治疗可显著改善IDFS(危险比(HR)=0.81,95%置信区间(CI)=0.68-0.97,P=0.024),但不能改善DRFS(HR=0.84,95% CI=0.56-1.29,P=0.106)或OS(HR=0.96,95% CI=0.77-1.19,P=0.692)。在新辅助治疗中,与对照组相比,CDK4/6抑制剂可改善CCCA(RR = 2.08,95% CI = 1.33-3.26,P = 0.001)。结论在HR+/HER2-早期乳腺癌患者中添加CDK4/6抑制剂可显著改善辅助治疗中的IDFS和新辅助治疗中的CCCA。然而,CDK4/6抑制剂在治疗过程中也表现出明显的毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Frontiers in Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.90%
发文量
5163
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Pharmacology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across disciplines, including basic and clinical pharmacology, medicinal chemistry, pharmacy and toxicology. Field Chief Editor Heike Wulff at UC Davis is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
期刊最新文献
The glucocorticoid dose-mortality nexus in pneumonia patients: unveiling the threshold effect. The impact of EU public procurement regulations on tenders in Spain: a study with adalimumab. The role of TRPV1 in chronic prostatitis: a review. Transcriptomics-based anti-tuberculous mechanism of traditional Chinese polyherbal preparation NiuBeiXiaoHe intermediates. Applications and challenges of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of skin malignancies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1