Immune Cell Densities Predict Response to Immune Checkpoint-Blockade in Head and Neck Cancer

Daniel A. Ruiz Torres, Michael E. Bryan, Shun Hirayama, Ross D. Merkin, Luciani Evelyn, Thomas Roberts, Manisha Patel, Jong C. Park, Lori J. Wirth, Peter M. Sadow, Moshe Sade-Feldman, Shannon L. Stott, Daniel L. Faden
{"title":"Immune Cell Densities Predict Response to Immune Checkpoint-Blockade in Head and Neck Cancer","authors":"Daniel A. Ruiz Torres, Michael E. Bryan, Shun Hirayama, Ross D. Merkin, Luciani Evelyn, Thomas Roberts, Manisha Patel, Jong C. Park, Lori J. Wirth, Peter M. Sadow, Moshe Sade-Feldman, Shannon L. Stott, Daniel L. Faden","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.10.24313432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is the standard of care for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), yet efficacy remains low. The current approach for predicting the likelihood of response to ICB is a single proportional biomarker (PD-L1) expressed in immune and tumor cells (Combined Positive Score, CPS) without differentiation by cell type, potentially explaining its limited predictive value. Tertiary Lymphoid Structures (TLS) have shown a stronger association with ICB response than PD-L1. However, their exact composition, size, and spatial biology in HNSCC remain understudied. A detailed understanding of TLS is required for future use as a clinically applicable predictive biomarker. Methods: Pre-ICB tumor tissue sections were obtained from 9 responders (complete response, partial response, or stable disease) and 11 non-responders (progressive disease) classified via RECISTv1.1. A custom multi-immunofluorescence (mIF) staining assay was designed, optimized, and applied to characterize tumor cells (pan-cytokeratin), T cells (CD4, CD8), B cells (CD19, CD20), myeloid cells (CD16, CD56, CD163), dendritic cells (LAMP3), fibroblasts (alpha-Smooth Muscle Actin), proliferative status (Ki67) and immunoregulatory molecules (PD1). Spatial metrics were compared among groups. Serial tissue sections were scored for TLS in both H&E and mIF slides. A machine learning model was employed to measure the effect of these metrics on achieving a response to ICB (SD, PR, or CR). Results: A higher density of B lymphocytes (CD20+) was found in responders compared to non-responders to ICB (p=0.022). A positive correlation was observed between mIF and pathologist identification of TLS (R2= 0.66, p-value= <0.0001). TLS trended toward being more prevalent in responders to ICB (p=0.0906). The presence of TLS within 100 um of the tumor was associated with improved overall (p=0.04) and progression-free survival (p=0.03). A multivariate machine learning model identified TLS density as a leading predictor of response to ICB with 80% accuracy. Conclusion: Immune cell densities and TLS spatial location within the tumor microenvironment play a critical role in the immune response to HNSCC and may potentially outperform CPS as a predictor of ICB response.","PeriodicalId":501437,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Oncology","volume":"95 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.10.24313432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is the standard of care for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), yet efficacy remains low. The current approach for predicting the likelihood of response to ICB is a single proportional biomarker (PD-L1) expressed in immune and tumor cells (Combined Positive Score, CPS) without differentiation by cell type, potentially explaining its limited predictive value. Tertiary Lymphoid Structures (TLS) have shown a stronger association with ICB response than PD-L1. However, their exact composition, size, and spatial biology in HNSCC remain understudied. A detailed understanding of TLS is required for future use as a clinically applicable predictive biomarker. Methods: Pre-ICB tumor tissue sections were obtained from 9 responders (complete response, partial response, or stable disease) and 11 non-responders (progressive disease) classified via RECISTv1.1. A custom multi-immunofluorescence (mIF) staining assay was designed, optimized, and applied to characterize tumor cells (pan-cytokeratin), T cells (CD4, CD8), B cells (CD19, CD20), myeloid cells (CD16, CD56, CD163), dendritic cells (LAMP3), fibroblasts (alpha-Smooth Muscle Actin), proliferative status (Ki67) and immunoregulatory molecules (PD1). Spatial metrics were compared among groups. Serial tissue sections were scored for TLS in both H&E and mIF slides. A machine learning model was employed to measure the effect of these metrics on achieving a response to ICB (SD, PR, or CR). Results: A higher density of B lymphocytes (CD20+) was found in responders compared to non-responders to ICB (p=0.022). A positive correlation was observed between mIF and pathologist identification of TLS (R2= 0.66, p-value= <0.0001). TLS trended toward being more prevalent in responders to ICB (p=0.0906). The presence of TLS within 100 um of the tumor was associated with improved overall (p=0.04) and progression-free survival (p=0.03). A multivariate machine learning model identified TLS density as a leading predictor of response to ICB with 80% accuracy. Conclusion: Immune cell densities and TLS spatial location within the tumor microenvironment play a critical role in the immune response to HNSCC and may potentially outperform CPS as a predictor of ICB response.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
免疫细胞密度可预测头颈癌患者对免疫检查点阻断剂的反应
免疫检查点阻断疗法(ICB)是治疗复发性/转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)的标准疗法,但疗效仍然很低。目前预测对 ICB 反应可能性的方法是免疫细胞和肿瘤细胞中表达的单一比例生物标记物(PD-L1)(联合阳性评分,CPS),没有按细胞类型进行区分,这可能是其预测价值有限的原因。三级淋巴结构(TLS)与 ICB 反应的关系比 PD-L1 更密切。然而,它们在 HNSCC 中的确切组成、大小和空间生物学特性仍未得到充分研究。要将 TLS 用作临床适用的预测性生物标志物,就必须对其有详细的了解。研究方法从通过 RECISTv1.1 分类的 9 例应答者(完全应答、部分应答或疾病稳定)和 11 例非应答者(疾病进展)中获取 ICSB 前肿瘤组织切片。我们设计、优化并应用了一种定制的多重免疫荧光(mIF)染色检测方法,以鉴定肿瘤细胞(泛角蛋白)、T 细胞(CD4、CD8)、B 细胞(CD19、CD20)、髓样细胞(CD16、CD56、CD163)、树突状细胞(LAMP3)、成纤维细胞(α-平滑肌肌动蛋白)、增殖状态(Ki67)和免疫调节分子(PD1)。对各组的空间指标进行比较。在 H&E 和 mIF 切片中对序列组织切片的 TLS 进行评分。采用机器学习模型来衡量这些指标对获得 ICB 反应(SD、PR 或 CR)的影响。结果显示与对 ICB 无反应者相比,有反应者的 B 淋巴细胞(CD20+)密度更高(p=0.022)。mIF与病理学家鉴定的TLS之间呈正相关(R2= 0.66,p值= 0.0001)。在对 ICB 有反应的患者中,TLS 呈多发趋势(p=0.0906)。肿瘤 100 微米范围内出现 TLS 与总生存期(p=0.04)和无进展生存期(p=0.03)的改善有关。多变量机器学习模型确定 TLS 密度是 ICB 反应的主要预测因素,准确率为 80%。结论免疫细胞密度和 TLS 在肿瘤微环境中的空间位置在 HNSCC 的免疫反应中起着至关重要的作用,作为 ICB 反应的预测指标,可能优于 CPS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Observer Reliability and Diagnostic Accuracy of CT-LEFAT Criteria for Post-Treatment Head and Neck Lymphedema: A Prospective Blinded Comparative Analysis of Oncologist Human Inter-Rater Performance Whole Genome Sequencing and single-cell transcriptomics identify KMT2D as a potential new driver for pituitary adenomas Self Reported Financial Difficulties Among Patients with Multiple Myeloma and Chronis Lymphocytic Leukemia Treated at U.S. Community Oncology Clinics (Alliance A231602CD) First-in-human evaluation of memory-like NK cells with an IL-15 super-agonist and CTLA-4 blockade in advanced head and neck cancer Viral transcript and tumor immune microenvironment-based transcriptomic profiling of HPV-associated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma identifies subtypes associated with prognosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1