Nonlinear global design resistance: Case studies of post‐tensioned concrete bridges made of I‐73 and KA‐61 girders

IF 3 3区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Structural Concrete Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI:10.1002/suco.202300986
Martin Lipowczan, Lukáš Novák, David Lehký, Drahomír Novák
{"title":"Nonlinear global design resistance: Case studies of post‐tensioned concrete bridges made of I‐73 and KA‐61 girders","authors":"Martin Lipowczan, Lukáš Novák, David Lehký, Drahomír Novák","doi":"10.1002/suco.202300986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper portrays a comprehensive computational procedure for determining the global structural resistances of two existing bridges made of I‐73 and KA‐61 precast post‐tensioned concrete girders using advanced statistical assessment methods in combination with nonlinear fracture mechanics‐based finite element method analysis. Although this combination is a powerful tool for realistic modeling of structures, its practical application is still very time consuming. Therefore, a statistical sampling approach for the determination of the structural design resistance is compared to selected efficient semi‐probabilistic methods based on the estimation of coefficient of variation—estimation of coefficient of variation (ECoV) method according to <jats:italic>fib</jats:italic> Model Code 2010 and improved approach called Eigen ECoV method. Load‐bearing capacity is determined for the ultimate as well as several serviceability limit states. The sensitivity of the input parameters burdened with uncertainties on the response of the structure is quantified using a sensitivity analysis supported by a surrogate model based on polynomial chaos expansion. The paper shows that the applicability of nonlinear modeling with respect to uncertainties is possible when using these ECoV methods and a surrogate model and can be applied in a routine manner. The shortcomings and advantages of all the used safety design/assessment methods are discussed.","PeriodicalId":21988,"journal":{"name":"Structural Concrete","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Concrete","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202300986","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper portrays a comprehensive computational procedure for determining the global structural resistances of two existing bridges made of I‐73 and KA‐61 precast post‐tensioned concrete girders using advanced statistical assessment methods in combination with nonlinear fracture mechanics‐based finite element method analysis. Although this combination is a powerful tool for realistic modeling of structures, its practical application is still very time consuming. Therefore, a statistical sampling approach for the determination of the structural design resistance is compared to selected efficient semi‐probabilistic methods based on the estimation of coefficient of variation—estimation of coefficient of variation (ECoV) method according to fib Model Code 2010 and improved approach called Eigen ECoV method. Load‐bearing capacity is determined for the ultimate as well as several serviceability limit states. The sensitivity of the input parameters burdened with uncertainties on the response of the structure is quantified using a sensitivity analysis supported by a surrogate model based on polynomial chaos expansion. The paper shows that the applicability of nonlinear modeling with respect to uncertainties is possible when using these ECoV methods and a surrogate model and can be applied in a routine manner. The shortcomings and advantages of all the used safety design/assessment methods are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非线性总体设计阻力:由 I-73 和 KA-61 梁组成的后张法混凝土桥梁案例研究
本文介绍了一种综合计算程序,该程序采用先进的统计评估方法,结合基于非线性断裂力学的有限元方法分析,确定了两座由 I-73 和 KA-61 预制后张法混凝土梁组成的现有桥梁的整体结构抗力。虽然这种组合是建立真实结构模型的有力工具,但其实际应用仍然非常耗时。因此,我们将用于确定结构设计阻力的统计抽样方法与基于变异系数估算--变异系数估算(ECoV)方法(根据 fib Model Code 2010 和改进方法 Eigen ECoV 方法)的选定高效半概率方法进行了比较。承载能力是根据极限状态和几种适用性极限状态确定的。使用基于多项式混沌扩展的代用模型支持的敏感性分析,量化了输入参数对结构响应的不确定性的敏感性。论文表明,在使用这些 ECoV 方法和代理模型时,可以对不确定性进行非线性建模,并且可以以常规方式应用。文中还讨论了所有使用的安全设计/评估方法的缺点和优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Structural Concrete
Structural Concrete CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY-ENGINEERING, CIVIL
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
15.60%
发文量
284
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Structural Concrete, the official journal of the fib, provides conceptual and procedural guidance in the field of concrete construction, and features peer-reviewed papers, keynote research and industry news covering all aspects of the design, construction, performance in service and demolition of concrete structures. Main topics: design, construction, performance in service, conservation (assessment, maintenance, strengthening) and demolition of concrete structures research about the behaviour of concrete structures development of design methods fib Model Code sustainability of concrete structures.
期刊最新文献
Development of a new analytical model for circular concrete ring segments with dry joints under combined effects Fiber orientation and orientation factors in steel fiber‐reinforced concrete beams with hybrid fibers: A critical review Load‐path analysis of transverse tensile stresses in multiple‐pile caps Mechanical behavior of prestressed UHPC wind turbine tower columns under combined axial compression and bending Experimental investigation on mechanical property and hydration process of sintered sludge cement paste at different water‐binder ratios and curing ages
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1