Machine learning assisted prediction of the mechanical properties of carbon nanotube‐incorporated concrete

IF 3 3区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Structural Concrete Pub Date : 2024-08-17 DOI:10.1002/suco.202400727
Muhammad Imran, Hassan Amjad, Shayan Khan, Shehroze Ali
{"title":"Machine learning assisted prediction of the mechanical properties of carbon nanotube‐incorporated concrete","authors":"Muhammad Imran, Hassan Amjad, Shayan Khan, Shehroze Ali","doi":"10.1002/suco.202400727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The incorporation of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) in concrete can improve the physical, mechanical, and durability properties. However, the interaction of CNTs with concrete and their effect on the mechanical properties remains a challenging issue. Also, the determination of mechanical properties through experimental testing is time‐consuming, laborious, and uneconomical. This study focuses on the development of machine learning (ML) models for the prediction of the mechanical properties of concrete. A comprehensive data set of 758 CNT‐modified concrete specimens was established for the compressive strength (CS), split tensile strength (STS), flexural strength (FS), and modulus of elasticity (MOE) values from the experimental studies in the literature. Afterward, the predictive models were developed using multilinear regression (MLR), support vector machine (SVM), ensemble methods (EN), regression tree (RT), and Gaussian process regression (GPR). It was found that among ML models, the GPR model predicted the CS, STS, and FS at the highest efficiency with the coefficient of determination (<jats:italic>R</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup>) of 0.83, 0.78, and 0.93, respectively while the performance of the SVM model was superior for predicting MOE with an <jats:italic>R</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> value of 0.91. The mean absolute error (MAE) of the GPR model for CS, STS, FS, and MOE were 2.92, 0.26, 0.35, and 1.31, respectively which were also lesser than other models. The training time of different models demonstrated that the GPR model has also a lower training time (~3 s) as compared to other models which indicates it has a high accuracy‐to‐time cost ratio. Further, the most influential parameters on CS were age, cement, water–cement ratio, and carbon nanotubes. The one‐way partial dependence analysis showed a direct correlation for age and cement but an inverse correlation for the water–cement ratio and fine aggregate. The graphical user interface provides the implication of the developed models for practical applications.","PeriodicalId":21988,"journal":{"name":"Structural Concrete","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Concrete","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202400727","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The incorporation of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) in concrete can improve the physical, mechanical, and durability properties. However, the interaction of CNTs with concrete and their effect on the mechanical properties remains a challenging issue. Also, the determination of mechanical properties through experimental testing is time‐consuming, laborious, and uneconomical. This study focuses on the development of machine learning (ML) models for the prediction of the mechanical properties of concrete. A comprehensive data set of 758 CNT‐modified concrete specimens was established for the compressive strength (CS), split tensile strength (STS), flexural strength (FS), and modulus of elasticity (MOE) values from the experimental studies in the literature. Afterward, the predictive models were developed using multilinear regression (MLR), support vector machine (SVM), ensemble methods (EN), regression tree (RT), and Gaussian process regression (GPR). It was found that among ML models, the GPR model predicted the CS, STS, and FS at the highest efficiency with the coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.83, 0.78, and 0.93, respectively while the performance of the SVM model was superior for predicting MOE with an R2 value of 0.91. The mean absolute error (MAE) of the GPR model for CS, STS, FS, and MOE were 2.92, 0.26, 0.35, and 1.31, respectively which were also lesser than other models. The training time of different models demonstrated that the GPR model has also a lower training time (~3 s) as compared to other models which indicates it has a high accuracy‐to‐time cost ratio. Further, the most influential parameters on CS were age, cement, water–cement ratio, and carbon nanotubes. The one‐way partial dependence analysis showed a direct correlation for age and cement but an inverse correlation for the water–cement ratio and fine aggregate. The graphical user interface provides the implication of the developed models for practical applications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器学习辅助预测掺入碳纳米管的混凝土的力学性能
在混凝土中加入碳纳米管(CNTs)可以改善混凝土的物理、机械和耐久性能。然而,碳纳米管与混凝土的相互作用及其对力学性能的影响仍然是一个具有挑战性的问题。此外,通过实验测试确定力学性能费时、费力且不经济。本研究的重点是开发用于预测混凝土力学性能的机器学习(ML)模型。根据文献中的实验研究,建立了 758 个 CNT 改性混凝土试件的抗压强度(CS)、劈裂拉伸强度(STS)、抗弯强度(FS)和弹性模量(MOE)值的综合数据集。随后,使用多线性回归(MLR)、支持向量机(SVM)、集合方法(EN)、回归树(RT)和高斯过程回归(GPR)建立了预测模型。结果发现,在 ML 模型中,GPR 模型预测 CS、STS 和 FS 的效率最高,其判定系数(R2)分别为 0.83、0.78 和 0.93,而 SVM 模型在预测 MOE 方面表现更优,其 R2 值为 0.91。GPR 模型预测 CS、STS、FS 和 MOE 的平均绝对误差(MAE)分别为 2.92、0.26、0.35 和 1.31,也小于其他模型。不同模型的训练时间表明,与其他模型相比,GPR 模型的训练时间也较短(约 3 秒),这表明它具有较高的准确度与时间成本比。此外,对 CS 影响最大的参数是龄期、水泥、水灰比和碳纳米管。单向偏相关分析表明,龄期和水泥具有直接相关性,但水灰比和细集料具有反相关性。图形用户界面提供了所开发模型的实际应用意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Structural Concrete
Structural Concrete CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY-ENGINEERING, CIVIL
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
15.60%
发文量
284
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Structural Concrete, the official journal of the fib, provides conceptual and procedural guidance in the field of concrete construction, and features peer-reviewed papers, keynote research and industry news covering all aspects of the design, construction, performance in service and demolition of concrete structures. Main topics: design, construction, performance in service, conservation (assessment, maintenance, strengthening) and demolition of concrete structures research about the behaviour of concrete structures development of design methods fib Model Code sustainability of concrete structures.
期刊最新文献
Development of a new analytical model for circular concrete ring segments with dry joints under combined effects Fiber orientation and orientation factors in steel fiber‐reinforced concrete beams with hybrid fibers: A critical review Load‐path analysis of transverse tensile stresses in multiple‐pile caps Mechanical behavior of prestressed UHPC wind turbine tower columns under combined axial compression and bending Experimental investigation on mechanical property and hydration process of sintered sludge cement paste at different water‐binder ratios and curing ages
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1