PROgressive struCturEd Simulation-based Surgical training program (PROCESS) - Open Vascular Surgery: Study protocol for triple-arm, randomized, simple-blinded educational clinical trial.

Alejandro Velandia-Sánchez, Camilo A. Polanía-Sandoval, José V. Álvarez-Martínez, Santiago Uribe-Ramírez, Juliana Tello-Pirateque, Carlos J. Pérez-Rivera, Juan P. Ávila-Madrigal, Danna L Cruz-Reyes, Paulo A. Cabrera-Rivera, Camilo E. Pérez-Cualtan, Edgar C Barrera, Yury F. Bustos-Martínez, Sebastián Gómez-Galán, Juan C Briceño, Michel MPJ Reijnen, Jaime Camacho-Mackenzie, Carlos O Mendivil, Juan G. Barrera-Carvajal
{"title":"PROgressive struCturEd Simulation-based Surgical training program (PROCESS) - Open Vascular Surgery: Study protocol for triple-arm, randomized, simple-blinded educational clinical trial.","authors":"Alejandro Velandia-Sánchez, Camilo A. Polanía-Sandoval, José V. Álvarez-Martínez, Santiago Uribe-Ramírez, Juliana Tello-Pirateque, Carlos J. Pérez-Rivera, Juan P. Ávila-Madrigal, Danna L Cruz-Reyes, Paulo A. Cabrera-Rivera, Camilo E. Pérez-Cualtan, Edgar C Barrera, Yury F. Bustos-Martínez, Sebastián Gómez-Galán, Juan C Briceño, Michel MPJ Reijnen, Jaime Camacho-Mackenzie, Carlos O Mendivil, Juan G. Barrera-Carvajal","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.22.24312415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Vascular surgery has been directed towards endovascular approaches; however, not all patients qualify for these procedures. Open vascular surgery remains crucial, demanding a steep learning curve. Exposure to these procedures has declined, resulting in a need for more standardization in acquiring open vascular surgery skills and potentially contributing to poorer outcomes. Simulation offers a solution, yet the evidence for structured programs in open vascular surgery is limited. This study aims to compare the efficacy of technical skill acquisition between a structured, progressive simulation-based training program and traditional experience-based training in open vascular surgery.\nMethods: A randomized, single-blinded, triple-arm educational clinical trial will be conducted. A control and intervention sequences of three groups with different exposure levels to the simulation program are proposed. Group 1: open abdominal aortic repair, Group 2: vascular anastomosis and open abdominal aortic repair, and Group 3: specific surgical skills, vascular anastomosis, and open abdominal aortic repair. 3D-printed models from AngioCT will be used for the open abdominal aortic repair simulation. Surgical residents of general, vascular, or cardiothoracic surgery programs will be included. Sample size calculation resulted in 45 participants, 15 per group. Simple blinding will involve external evaluators. Randomization will occur as simple randomization.\nDiscussion: We expect that the structured and progressive simulation-based training program would enhance technical surgical skills. Based on the progression through different modules within the program, we aim to determine a significant difference in the acquisition of technical surgical skills. We hypothesize that 3D-printed patient-specific models can enhance participants' vascular surgery training and provide optimal simulated scenarios while prioritizing patient safety. We hope this initiative will impact the formation of future vascular surgeons, shape future training programs, and ensure comprehensive preparation for open vascular surgery.\nTrial registration: This study protocol was registered in clinicaltrials.gov with the NCT-ID: NCT06452901.","PeriodicalId":501051,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.22.24312415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Vascular surgery has been directed towards endovascular approaches; however, not all patients qualify for these procedures. Open vascular surgery remains crucial, demanding a steep learning curve. Exposure to these procedures has declined, resulting in a need for more standardization in acquiring open vascular surgery skills and potentially contributing to poorer outcomes. Simulation offers a solution, yet the evidence for structured programs in open vascular surgery is limited. This study aims to compare the efficacy of technical skill acquisition between a structured, progressive simulation-based training program and traditional experience-based training in open vascular surgery. Methods: A randomized, single-blinded, triple-arm educational clinical trial will be conducted. A control and intervention sequences of three groups with different exposure levels to the simulation program are proposed. Group 1: open abdominal aortic repair, Group 2: vascular anastomosis and open abdominal aortic repair, and Group 3: specific surgical skills, vascular anastomosis, and open abdominal aortic repair. 3D-printed models from AngioCT will be used for the open abdominal aortic repair simulation. Surgical residents of general, vascular, or cardiothoracic surgery programs will be included. Sample size calculation resulted in 45 participants, 15 per group. Simple blinding will involve external evaluators. Randomization will occur as simple randomization. Discussion: We expect that the structured and progressive simulation-based training program would enhance technical surgical skills. Based on the progression through different modules within the program, we aim to determine a significant difference in the acquisition of technical surgical skills. We hypothesize that 3D-printed patient-specific models can enhance participants' vascular surgery training and provide optimal simulated scenarios while prioritizing patient safety. We hope this initiative will impact the formation of future vascular surgeons, shape future training programs, and ensure comprehensive preparation for open vascular surgery. Trial registration: This study protocol was registered in clinicaltrials.gov with the NCT-ID: NCT06452901.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于模拟的渐进式外科培训计划 (PROCESS) - 开放式血管外科:三臂、随机、单盲教育临床试验研究方案。
导言:血管外科手术已转向血管内治疗方法,但并非所有患者都适合这些手术。开放式血管外科手术仍然至关重要,需要陡峭的学习曲线。由于接触这些手术的机会越来越少,因此在掌握开放式血管手术技能方面需要更加标准化,这也可能导致手术效果不佳。模拟提供了一种解决方案,但开放式血管外科结构化程序的证据有限。本研究旨在比较开放血管手术中结构化、渐进式模拟培训计划与传统经验型培训对技术技能掌握的效果:方法:将进行一项随机、单盲、三臂教育临床试验。方法:将进行一项随机单盲三臂教育临床试验,拟分为对照组和干预组,三组在模拟程序中的接触程度不同。第一组:开放式腹主动脉修补术;第二组:血管吻合术和开放式腹主动脉修补术;第三组:特定手术技能、血管吻合术和开放式腹主动脉修补术。开放式腹主动脉修复模拟将使用 AngioCT 的 3D 打印模型。参与者将包括普通外科、血管外科或心胸外科的住院医师。样本量计算结果为 45 名参与者,每组 15 人。外部评估人员将参与简单的盲法。随机化将以简单随机化的方式进行:我们希望结构化、循序渐进的模拟培训计划能提高外科技术技能。根据该计划中不同模块的进展情况,我们旨在确定在获得外科技术技能方面是否存在显著差异。我们假设,3D 打印的患者特异性模型可以加强参与者的血管外科培训,并提供最佳模拟场景,同时优先考虑患者安全。我们希望这一举措将影响未来血管外科医生的培养,塑造未来的培训计划,并确保为开放式血管手术做好全面准备:本研究方案已在 clinicaltrials.gov 注册,NCT-ID:NCT06452901。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The VIPR-1 trial (Visualizing Ischemia in the Pancreatic Remnant) - Assessing the role of intraoperative indocyanine green perfusion of the transected pancreas in predicting postoperative pancreatic leaks: protocol for a prospective phase II trial. Insulin-dependence as a Predictor of Shortened Cancer-specific Survival in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Multi-Institutional Study from the United States Neuroendocrine Study Group Chyme Reinfusion Practices in the Neonatal Population Traumatic Amputations - A Nationwide Epidemiological Analysis of a developing country over 16 years Development and Validation of Collaborative Robot-assisted Cutting Method for Iliac Crest Flap Raising: Randomized Crossover Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1