A complete characterization of pairs of binary phylogenetic trees with identical $A_k$-alignments

Mirko Wilde, Mareike Fischer
{"title":"A complete characterization of pairs of binary phylogenetic trees with identical $A_k$-alignments","authors":"Mirko Wilde, Mareike Fischer","doi":"arxiv-2408.07011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Phylogenetic trees play a key role in the reconstruction of evolutionary\nrelationships. Typically, they are derived from aligned sequence data (like\nDNA, RNA, or proteins) by using optimization criteria like, e.g., maximum\nparsimony (MP). It is believed that the latter is able to reconstruct the\n\\enquote{true} tree, i.e., the tree that generated the data, whenever the\nnumber of substitutions required to explain the data with that tree is\nrelatively small compared to the size of the tree (measured in the number $n$\nof leaves of the tree, which represent the species under investigation).\nHowever, reconstructing the correct tree from any alignment first and foremost\nrequires the given alignment to perform differently on the \\enquote{correct}\ntree than on others. A special type of alignments, namely so-called $A_k$-alignments, has gained\nconsiderable interest in recent literature. These alignments consist of all\nbinary characters (\\enquote{sites}) which require precisely $k$ substitutions\non a given tree. It has been found that whenever $k$ is small enough (in\ncomparison to $n$), $A_k$-alignments uniquely characterize the trees that\ngenerated them. However, recent literature has left a significant gap between\n$k\\leq 2k+2$ -- namely the cases in which no such characterization is possible\n-- and $k\\geq 4k$ -- namely the cases in which this characterization works. It\nis the main aim of the present manuscript to close this gap, i.e., to present a\nfull characterization of all pairs of trees that share the same\n$A_k$-alignment. In particular, we show that indeed every binary phylogenetic\ntree with $n$ leaves is uniquely defined by its $A_k$-alignments if $n\\geq\n2k+3$. By closing said gap, we also ensure that our result is optimal.","PeriodicalId":501044,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Populations and Evolution","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Populations and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.07011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Phylogenetic trees play a key role in the reconstruction of evolutionary relationships. Typically, they are derived from aligned sequence data (like DNA, RNA, or proteins) by using optimization criteria like, e.g., maximum parsimony (MP). It is believed that the latter is able to reconstruct the \enquote{true} tree, i.e., the tree that generated the data, whenever the number of substitutions required to explain the data with that tree is relatively small compared to the size of the tree (measured in the number $n$ of leaves of the tree, which represent the species under investigation). However, reconstructing the correct tree from any alignment first and foremost requires the given alignment to perform differently on the \enquote{correct} tree than on others. A special type of alignments, namely so-called $A_k$-alignments, has gained considerable interest in recent literature. These alignments consist of all binary characters (\enquote{sites}) which require precisely $k$ substitutions on a given tree. It has been found that whenever $k$ is small enough (in comparison to $n$), $A_k$-alignments uniquely characterize the trees that generated them. However, recent literature has left a significant gap between $k\leq 2k+2$ -- namely the cases in which no such characterization is possible -- and $k\geq 4k$ -- namely the cases in which this characterization works. It is the main aim of the present manuscript to close this gap, i.e., to present a full characterization of all pairs of trees that share the same $A_k$-alignment. In particular, we show that indeed every binary phylogenetic tree with $n$ leaves is uniquely defined by its $A_k$-alignments if $n\geq 2k+3$. By closing said gap, we also ensure that our result is optimal.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
具有相同 A_k$ 对齐结果的成对二元系统发生树的完整表征
系统发生树在重建进化关系中起着关键作用。通常情况下,系统发生树是通过最大同源性(MP)等优化标准,从对齐的序列数据(如DNA、RNA或蛋白质)中推导出来的。人们认为,只要用这棵树解释数据所需的替换数相对于树的大小(以树的叶子数$n$来衡量,叶子代表被研究的物种)较小,后者就能重建(enquote{true})树,即生成数据的树。然而,从任何排列中重建正确的树首先要求给定的排列在(enquote{correct})树上的表现不同于在其他树上的表现。一种特殊类型的排列,即所谓的 $A_k$-排列,在最近的文献中引起了相当大的兴趣。这些排列由所有二进制字符(enquote{sites})组成,这些字符需要在给定的树上精确地进行 $k$ 替换。研究发现,只要 $k$ 足够小(与 $n$ 相比),$A_k$-排列就能唯一地描述产生这些排列的树。然而,最近的文献在$k\leq 2k+2$--即不可能进行这种表征的情况--和$k\geq 4k$--即这种表征起作用的情况之间留下了很大的空白。本手稿的主要目的是填补这一空白,即对所有共享相同 $A_k$ 对齐方式的树对进行全面描述。特别是,我们证明,如果 $n\geq2k+3$ ,那么每一棵有 $n$ 叶子的二元系统树都是由其 $A_k$ 对齐方式唯一定义的。通过缩小上述差距,我们还确保了我们的结果是最优的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biological arrow of time: Emergence of tangled information hierarchies and self-modelling dynamics k-mer-based approaches to bridging pangenomics and population genetics A weather-driven mathematical model of Culex population abundance and the impact of vector control interventions Dynamics of solutions to a multi-patch epidemic model with a saturation incidence mechanism Higher-order interactions in random Lotka-Volterra communities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1