511. IS IT SAFE TO USE NONABSORBABLE MESH IMPLANTATION FOR HIATAL REINFORCEMENT DURING PRIMARY ANTIREFLUX PROCEDURES?

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Diseases of the Esophagus Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1093/dote/doae057.246
Yevhen Haidarzhi
{"title":"511. IS IT SAFE TO USE NONABSORBABLE MESH IMPLANTATION FOR HIATAL REINFORCEMENT DURING PRIMARY ANTIREFLUX PROCEDURES?","authors":"Yevhen Haidarzhi","doi":"10.1093/dote/doae057.246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Laparoscopic Fundoplication (LF) is highly effective in surgical treatment of GERD and the prevention of disease progression. Currently it is the gold standard of treatment and allows to achieve good and excellent postoperative results in majority patients. However, despite the gained experience, failures of primary LF and hiatus repair like hiatal hernia recurrence demonstrate that current surgical techniques are not optimal. One of the decisions is mesh implantation for hiatal reinforcement in GERD. However, due to the different types of complications (mesh erosion, scarring, dysphagia) safety use of mesh are still controversial. Method Laparoscopic Total Fundoplication (LTF) with nonabsorbable and composite light mesh implantation for hiatal reinforcement during 2022 – 2023 years were performed in 71 patients. We use macroporous nonabsorbable polypropylene or composite (polypropylene/monocryl) light mesh repair routinely by own proposed surgical technique. Our decision did not depend on size of hiatal hernia and hiatal surface area. We use U-shaped mesh posteriorly on the approximated crura by previous interrupted suturing not around the esophagus (Fig. 1). The mesh fixes with staples to the muscular and ligamentous structures of crura. We compared our results with the group of LTF without mesh implantation. Result All patients underwent completed validated questionnaires, esophagogasroduodenoscopy, contrast video esophagram, 24-hour impedance-pH monitoring after surgery. Some patients underwent computed tomography. Along with the disappearance of GERD symptoms, no mesh erosion and long (>3 month) postoperative follow-up dysphagia were marked in any patient with mesh repair. There are no significant difference in comparison with these results of LTF without mesh implantation. During the early postoperative period (< 12 months) no recurrence of hiatal hernia was diagnosed in the group with mesh implantation. Conclusion According to our study, in comparison with no-mesh repair, the proposed surgical technique is safe. Nonabsorbable and composite light mesh implantation for hiatal enforcement during primary antireflux procedures may be used routinely to prevent hiatal hernia recurrence effectively. Further, longer-term follow-up will be continued to confirm this position.","PeriodicalId":11354,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":"117 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae057.246","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Laparoscopic Fundoplication (LF) is highly effective in surgical treatment of GERD and the prevention of disease progression. Currently it is the gold standard of treatment and allows to achieve good and excellent postoperative results in majority patients. However, despite the gained experience, failures of primary LF and hiatus repair like hiatal hernia recurrence demonstrate that current surgical techniques are not optimal. One of the decisions is mesh implantation for hiatal reinforcement in GERD. However, due to the different types of complications (mesh erosion, scarring, dysphagia) safety use of mesh are still controversial. Method Laparoscopic Total Fundoplication (LTF) with nonabsorbable and composite light mesh implantation for hiatal reinforcement during 2022 – 2023 years were performed in 71 patients. We use macroporous nonabsorbable polypropylene or composite (polypropylene/monocryl) light mesh repair routinely by own proposed surgical technique. Our decision did not depend on size of hiatal hernia and hiatal surface area. We use U-shaped mesh posteriorly on the approximated crura by previous interrupted suturing not around the esophagus (Fig. 1). The mesh fixes with staples to the muscular and ligamentous structures of crura. We compared our results with the group of LTF without mesh implantation. Result All patients underwent completed validated questionnaires, esophagogasroduodenoscopy, contrast video esophagram, 24-hour impedance-pH monitoring after surgery. Some patients underwent computed tomography. Along with the disappearance of GERD symptoms, no mesh erosion and long (>3 month) postoperative follow-up dysphagia were marked in any patient with mesh repair. There are no significant difference in comparison with these results of LTF without mesh implantation. During the early postoperative period (< 12 months) no recurrence of hiatal hernia was diagnosed in the group with mesh implantation. Conclusion According to our study, in comparison with no-mesh repair, the proposed surgical technique is safe. Nonabsorbable and composite light mesh implantation for hiatal enforcement during primary antireflux procedures may be used routinely to prevent hiatal hernia recurrence effectively. Further, longer-term follow-up will be continued to confirm this position.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
511.在初级抗反流手术中使用不吸收网片植入加固裂孔是否安全?
背景腹腔镜胃底折叠术(LF)在胃食管反流病的手术治疗和预防疾病进展方面非常有效。目前,腹腔镜胃底折叠术是治疗胃食管反流病的黄金标准,大多数患者都能获得良好的术后效果。然而,尽管积累了丰富的经验,初级 LF 和食道裂孔修补术的失败(如食道裂孔疝复发)表明,目前的手术技术并不理想。其中一项决定是在胃食管反流病的食管裂孔加固术中植入网片。然而,由于不同类型的并发症(网片侵蚀、瘢痕、吞咽困难),网片的安全使用仍存在争议。方法 在 2022 年至 2023 年期间,对 71 名患者进行了腹腔镜下全胃底折叠术(LTF),并植入非吸收性和复合轻型网片进行食道裂孔加固。我们采用自己提出的手术技术,常规使用大孔不吸收聚丙烯或复合(聚丙烯/单丙烯)轻型网片进行修复。我们的决定并不取决于裂孔疝的大小和裂孔表面积。我们使用 U 型网片,通过先前的间断缝合(而不是食管周围的间断缝合),将网片固定在近似嵴的后方(图 1)。网片用订书钉固定在嵴的肌肉和韧带结构上。我们将结果与未植入网片的 LTF 组进行了比较。结果 所有患者均在术后接受了完整的有效问卷调查、食管胃十二指肠镜检查、造影剂视频食管造影、24 小时阻抗-pH 监测。部分患者接受了计算机断层扫描。在胃食管反流症状消失的同时,所有网片修复患者均未出现网片侵蚀和术后长时间(3 个月)的吞咽困难。这些结果与未植入网片的 LTF 相比没有明显差异。在术后早期(< 12 个月),植入网片组未诊断出食道裂孔疝复发。结论 根据我们的研究,与无网片修复术相比,建议的手术技术是安全的。在初级抗反流术中植入不可取和复合轻型网片进行食道裂孔修补术,可有效预防食道裂孔疝复发。我们将继续进行更长期的随访,以确认这一立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diseases of the Esophagus
Diseases of the Esophagus 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
568
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Diseases of the Esophagus covers all aspects of the esophagus - etiology, investigation and diagnosis, and both medical and surgical treatment.
期刊最新文献
624. LONG-TERM OUTCOME OF NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY FOLLOWED BY ESOPHAGECTOMY VERSUS DEFINITIVE PROTON BEAM THERAPY FOR ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA 260. LOW BLOOD LEVEL OF TUMOR SUPPRESSOR MIR-3619 AS A TARGET OF NUCLEIC ACID THERAPY TO PIM-1 IN ESOPHAGEAL CANCER 222. LONG-TERM SURVIVAL OF ROBOT-ASSISTED ESOPHAGECTOMY AND ITS UTILITY IN TREATING CT4B ESOPHAGEAL CANCER 582. LOW EXPRESSION OF FRG1 PROMOTES MIGRATION AND INVASION IN ESOPHAGEAL CANCER 449. CAN LARGE ANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE AFTER ESOPHAGEAL SURGERY BE TREATED BY ENDOLUMINAL VACUUM-ASSISTED CLOSURE (EVAC THERAPY)?: A CASE REPORT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1