Individual differences in text processing and recall in children with and without ADHD

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1111/1471-3802.12717
Olivia Ward, Deanna C. Friesen
{"title":"Individual differences in text processing and recall in children with and without ADHD","authors":"Olivia Ward, Deanna C. Friesen","doi":"10.1111/1471-3802.12717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study examined whether children with and without ADHD differed in text processing when contradictory information was present. Forty‐seven children between 10 and 14 years old performed a self‐paced reading task. Half the passages contained contradictory information. Additionally, language and cognitive skills were assessed to examine the relationships between text processing and individual differences in these abilities (working memory, oral sentence recognition, verbal and non‐verbal intelligence, word reading fluency and decoding ability). Results indicate that the non‐ADHD group modulated their reading behaviour based on the presence of inconsistent information, whereas the ADHD group did so in response to the consistent information. However, this task effect in the ADHD group was primarily observed with children who scored low on background measures (e.g., verbal intelligence, working memory). Additionally, the children with ADHD recalled fewer units of information than their non‐ADHD peers. Correlations demonstrated that the pattern of relationships between the text comprehension measures (i.e., true‐false test and text recall) and the background measures differed between the two groups, such that measures were more closely associated with each other in the ADHD group. Results are discussed in terms of educational implications to support children with ADHD who experience reading comprehension difficulties.","PeriodicalId":46783,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study examined whether children with and without ADHD differed in text processing when contradictory information was present. Forty‐seven children between 10 and 14 years old performed a self‐paced reading task. Half the passages contained contradictory information. Additionally, language and cognitive skills were assessed to examine the relationships between text processing and individual differences in these abilities (working memory, oral sentence recognition, verbal and non‐verbal intelligence, word reading fluency and decoding ability). Results indicate that the non‐ADHD group modulated their reading behaviour based on the presence of inconsistent information, whereas the ADHD group did so in response to the consistent information. However, this task effect in the ADHD group was primarily observed with children who scored low on background measures (e.g., verbal intelligence, working memory). Additionally, the children with ADHD recalled fewer units of information than their non‐ADHD peers. Correlations demonstrated that the pattern of relationships between the text comprehension measures (i.e., true‐false test and text recall) and the background measures differed between the two groups, such that measures were more closely associated with each other in the ADHD group. Results are discussed in terms of educational implications to support children with ADHD who experience reading comprehension difficulties.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有多动症和无多动症儿童在文本处理和回忆方面的个体差异
本研究探讨了当出现矛盾信息时,患有和不患有多动症的儿童在文本处理方面是否存在差异。47 名 10 至 14 岁的儿童完成了一项自定步调的阅读任务。半数段落包含矛盾信息。此外,还对语言和认知能力进行了评估,以研究文本处理与这些能力(工作记忆、口头句子识别、语言和非语言智能、单词阅读流畅性和解码能力)的个体差异之间的关系。结果表明,非多动症组根据不一致信息的存在来调节他们的阅读行为,而多动症组则根据一致信息的存在来调节他们的阅读行为。不过,多动症组的这种任务效应主要是在背景测量(如言语智力、工作记忆)得分较低的儿童身上观察到的。此外,与非多动症儿童相比,多动症儿童回忆的信息单位更少。相关性表明,两组儿童的文本理解能力测量(即真假测试和文本回忆)与背景测量之间的关系模式有所不同,因此,多动症组儿童的测量结果之间的关系更为密切。本文从教育意义的角度对研究结果进行了讨论,以便为阅读理解有困难的多动症儿童提供帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs (JORSEN) is an established online forum for the dissemination of international research on special educational needs. JORSEN aims to: Publish original research, literature reviews and theoretical papers on meeting special educational needs Create an international forum for researchers to reflect on, and share ideas regarding, issues of particular importance to them such as methodology, research design and ethical issues Reach a wide multi-disciplinary national and international audience through online publication Authors are invited to submit reports of original research, reviews of research and scholarly papers on methodology, research design and ethical issues. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs will provide essential reading for those working in the special educational needs field wherever that work takes place around the world. It will be of particular interest to those working in: Research Teaching and learning support Policymaking Administration and supervision Educational psychology Advocacy.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Parents' lived experiences regarding the decision‐making process on reasonable accommodations for their child with SEN—An IPA analysis Trends in instructional technologies used in education of people with special needs due to intellectual disability and autism Teachers' relational competence towards students with neurodevelopmental symptoms: A microscopic relational analysis Theory is inclusive, practice is integrative? Discourses on inclusion in the education community
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1