Prognosis evaluation and efficacy analysis of different treatment options for patients with visceral pleural invasion in stage IIA–IIB lung cancer

Qi Liu, Liusheng Wu, Xiangyu Wang, Yu Feng, Ying Wang, Jun Yan, Xiaoqiang Li
{"title":"Prognosis evaluation and efficacy analysis of different treatment options for patients with visceral pleural invasion in stage IIA–IIB lung cancer","authors":"Qi Liu, Liusheng Wu, Xiangyu Wang, Yu Feng, Ying Wang, Jun Yan, Xiaoqiang Li","doi":"10.1007/s12672-024-01307-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective</h3><p>Controversy surrounds the treatment of visceral pleural invasion in lung cancer, and no studies have compared the efficacy of its four main treatment options (i.e., surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy). This study aims to compare and analyze surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy outcomes and explore the optimal treatment of visceral pleural invasion in lung cancer.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We searched electronic databases (i.e., Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database Search) for relevant studies of treatment options for patients with visceral pleural invasion in stage IIA–IIB lung cancer. Searches times were limited to studies published between January 1, 2000 and February 20, 2021. Meta analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software We also downloaded original RNA transcription data about lung cancer invasion in the GEO and TCGA tumor databases, and used R 4.0.3 software to perform differential expression and co-expression gene network analyses.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>We included a total of 25 high-quality (i.e., Jadad score 4–7) studies. Meta-analysis found that surgical treatment was associated with a 3-year survival rate OR = 3.80 (95% CI 3.53, 4.09; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001), 5-year survival rate OR = 4.10 (95% CI 3.72, 4.53; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001), and median survival time OR = 2.71 (95% CI 2.53, 2.89; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001). Chemotherapy was associated with a 3-year survival rate OR = 2.08 (95% CI 1.93, 2.25; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001), 5-year survival rate OR = 1.68 (95% CI 1.49, 1.89; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001), and median survival time OR = 1.84 (95% CI 1.66, 2.04; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001). Targeted therapy was associated with a 3-year survival rate OR = 2.91 (95% CI 2.65, 3.19; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001), 5-year survival rate OR = 1.83 (95% CI 1.39, 2.33; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001), and median survival time OR = 1.76 (95% CI 1.59, 1.94; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001). Finally, immunotherapy was associated with a 3-year survival rate OR = 1.89 (95% CI 1.73, 2.07; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001), 5-year survival rate OR = 1.66 (95% CI 1.46, 1.88; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001), and median survival time OR = 2.53 (95% CI 2.27, 2.82; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001). After screening differential genes and co-expressed genes in tumor gene databases, we found that AC245595.1, ITGB1-DT and AL606489.1 may be involved in the process of lung cancer invasion, and macrophages M1 and M2, CD4+-Th1, CD8+-Th1 may participate in immune infiltration.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>In patients with visceral pleural invasion of stage IIA-IIB lung cancer, chemotherapy has shown a significant effect on improving prognosis and enhancing efficacy. However, surgical treatment did not significantly improve the overall prognosis. Therefore, the individual situation of the patient and the comprehensive benefits of the treatment program should be fully considered when developing the treatment program.</p>","PeriodicalId":13170,"journal":{"name":"Hormones and Cancer","volume":"183 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hormones and Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-024-01307-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Controversy surrounds the treatment of visceral pleural invasion in lung cancer, and no studies have compared the efficacy of its four main treatment options (i.e., surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy). This study aims to compare and analyze surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy outcomes and explore the optimal treatment of visceral pleural invasion in lung cancer.

Methods

We searched electronic databases (i.e., Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database Search) for relevant studies of treatment options for patients with visceral pleural invasion in stage IIA–IIB lung cancer. Searches times were limited to studies published between January 1, 2000 and February 20, 2021. Meta analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software We also downloaded original RNA transcription data about lung cancer invasion in the GEO and TCGA tumor databases, and used R 4.0.3 software to perform differential expression and co-expression gene network analyses.

Results

We included a total of 25 high-quality (i.e., Jadad score 4–7) studies. Meta-analysis found that surgical treatment was associated with a 3-year survival rate OR = 3.80 (95% CI 3.53, 4.09; P < 0.0001), 5-year survival rate OR = 4.10 (95% CI 3.72, 4.53; P < 0.0001), and median survival time OR = 2.71 (95% CI 2.53, 2.89; P < 0.0001). Chemotherapy was associated with a 3-year survival rate OR = 2.08 (95% CI 1.93, 2.25; P < 0.0001), 5-year survival rate OR = 1.68 (95% CI 1.49, 1.89; P < 0.0001), and median survival time OR = 1.84 (95% CI 1.66, 2.04; P < 0.0001). Targeted therapy was associated with a 3-year survival rate OR = 2.91 (95% CI 2.65, 3.19; P < 0.0001), 5-year survival rate OR = 1.83 (95% CI 1.39, 2.33; P < 0.0001), and median survival time OR = 1.76 (95% CI 1.59, 1.94; P < 0.0001). Finally, immunotherapy was associated with a 3-year survival rate OR = 1.89 (95% CI 1.73, 2.07; P < 0.0001), 5-year survival rate OR = 1.66 (95% CI 1.46, 1.88; P < 0.0001), and median survival time OR = 2.53 (95% CI 2.27, 2.82; P < 0.0001). After screening differential genes and co-expressed genes in tumor gene databases, we found that AC245595.1, ITGB1-DT and AL606489.1 may be involved in the process of lung cancer invasion, and macrophages M1 and M2, CD4+-Th1, CD8+-Th1 may participate in immune infiltration.

Conclusions

In patients with visceral pleural invasion of stage IIA-IIB lung cancer, chemotherapy has shown a significant effect on improving prognosis and enhancing efficacy. However, surgical treatment did not significantly improve the overall prognosis. Therefore, the individual situation of the patient and the comprehensive benefits of the treatment program should be fully considered when developing the treatment program.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
IIA-IIB 期肺癌内脏胸膜侵犯患者的预后评估和不同治疗方案的疗效分析
目的围绕肺癌内脏胸膜侵犯的治疗存在争议,目前尚无研究比较其四种主要治疗方案(即手术、化疗、靶向治疗和免疫治疗)的疗效。本研究旨在比较分析手术、化疗、靶向治疗和免疫治疗的疗效,探讨肺癌内脏胸膜浸润的最佳治疗方案。方法我们检索了电子数据库(即Pubmed、Embase、Cochrane Library、CNKI和中国生物医学文献数据库检索)中关于IIA-IIB期肺癌内脏胸膜浸润患者治疗方案的相关研究。检索时间限于 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 2 月 20 日之间发表的研究。我们还从 GEO 和 TCGA 肿瘤数据库中下载了有关肺癌侵犯的原始 RNA 转录数据,并使用 R 4.0.3 软件进行了差异表达和共表达基因网络分析。Meta 分析发现,手术治疗与 3 年生存率 OR = 3.80 (95% CI 3.53, 4.09; P <0.0001)、5 年生存率 OR = 4.10 (95% CI 3.72, 4.53; P <0.0001)和中位生存时间 OR = 2.71 (95% CI 2.53, 2.89; P <0.0001)相关。化疗与 3 年生存率 OR = 2.08(95% CI 1.93,2.25;P <;0.0001)、5 年生存率 OR = 1.68(95% CI 1.49,1.89;P <;0.0001)和中位生存时间 OR = 1.84(95% CI 1.66,2.04;P <;0.0001)相关。靶向治疗与 3 年生存率 OR = 2.91(95% CI 2.65,3.19;P <;0.0001)、5 年生存率 OR = 1.83(95% CI 1.39,2.33;P <;0.0001)和中位生存时间 OR = 1.76(95% CI 1.59,1.94;P <;0.0001)相关。最后,免疫疗法与 3 年生存率 OR = 1.89(95% CI 1.73,2.07;P <;0.0001)、5 年生存率 OR = 1.66(95% CI 1.46,1.88;P <;0.0001)和中位生存时间 OR = 2.53(95% CI 2.27,2.82;P <;0.0001)相关。在对肿瘤基因数据库中的差异基因和共表达基因进行筛选后,我们发现AC245595.1、ITGB1-DT和AL606489.1可能参与了肺癌的侵袭过程,巨噬细胞M1和M2、CD4+-Th1、CD8+-Th1可能参与了免疫浸润。然而,手术治疗并不能明显改善总体预后。因此,在制定治疗方案时,应充分考虑患者的个体情况和治疗方案的综合效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A reference for selecting an appropriate method for generating glioblastoma organoids from the application perspective Prognostic aging gene-based score for colorectal cancer: unveiling links to drug resistance, mutation burden, and personalized treatment strategies Evaluation of circulating plasma proteins in prostate cancer using mendelian randomization Clinical efficacy and immune response of BCL-2 inhibitors combined with hypomethylating agents in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia Nanoquercetin based nanoformulations for triple negative breast cancer therapy and its role in overcoming drug resistance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1