Lorenzo Gaetani,Federico Paolini Paoletti,Alessandro Mechelli,Giovanni Bellomo,Lucilla Parnetti
{"title":"Research advancement in fluid biomarkers for Parkinson's disease.","authors":"Lorenzo Gaetani,Federico Paolini Paoletti,Alessandro Mechelli,Giovanni Bellomo,Lucilla Parnetti","doi":"10.1080/14737159.2024.2403073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\r\nDiagnostic criteria for Parkinson's disease (PD) rely on clinical, mainly motor, features, implying that pre-motor phase cannot be accurately identified. To achieve a reliable early diagnosis, similar to what has been done for Alzheimer's disease (AD), a shift from clinical to biological identification of PD is being pursued. This shift has taken great advantage from the research on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers as they mirror the ongoing molecular pathogenic mechanisms taking place in PD, thus intercepting the disease timely with respect to clinical manifestations.\r\n\r\nAREAS COVERED\r\nCSF α-synuclein seed amplification assay (αS-SAA) has emerged as the most promising biomarker of α-synucleinopathy. CSF biomarkers reflecting AD-pathology and axonal damage (neurofilament light chain) and a novel marker of dopaminergic dysfunction (DOPA decarboxylase) add valuable diagnostic and prognostic information in the neurochemical characterization of PD.\r\n\r\nEXPERT OPINION\r\nA biological classification system of PD, encompassing pathophysiological and staging biomarkers, might ensure both early identification and prognostic characterization of the patient. This approach could allow for the best setting for disease-modifying treatments which are currently under investigation.","PeriodicalId":12113,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","volume":"406 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737159.2024.2403073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Diagnostic criteria for Parkinson's disease (PD) rely on clinical, mainly motor, features, implying that pre-motor phase cannot be accurately identified. To achieve a reliable early diagnosis, similar to what has been done for Alzheimer's disease (AD), a shift from clinical to biological identification of PD is being pursued. This shift has taken great advantage from the research on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers as they mirror the ongoing molecular pathogenic mechanisms taking place in PD, thus intercepting the disease timely with respect to clinical manifestations.
AREAS COVERED
CSF α-synuclein seed amplification assay (αS-SAA) has emerged as the most promising biomarker of α-synucleinopathy. CSF biomarkers reflecting AD-pathology and axonal damage (neurofilament light chain) and a novel marker of dopaminergic dysfunction (DOPA decarboxylase) add valuable diagnostic and prognostic information in the neurochemical characterization of PD.
EXPERT OPINION
A biological classification system of PD, encompassing pathophysiological and staging biomarkers, might ensure both early identification and prognostic characterization of the patient. This approach could allow for the best setting for disease-modifying treatments which are currently under investigation.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics (ISSN 1473-7159) publishes expert reviews of the latest advancements in the field of molecular diagnostics including the detection and monitoring of the molecular causes of disease that are being translated into groundbreaking diagnostic and prognostic technologies to be used in the clinical diagnostic setting.
Each issue of Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics contains leading reviews on current and emerging topics relating to molecular diagnostics, subject to a rigorous peer review process; editorials discussing contentious issues in the field; diagnostic profiles featuring independent, expert evaluations of diagnostic tests; meeting reports of recent molecular diagnostics conferences and key paper evaluations featuring assessments of significant, recently published articles from specialists in molecular diagnostic therapy.
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics provides the forum for reporting the critical advances being made in this ever-expanding field, as well as the major challenges ahead in their clinical implementation. The journal delivers this information in concise, at-a-glance article formats: invaluable to a time-constrained community.