Effect of Vitreous Reflux after Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection for Macular Edema with Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Real-World Study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1155/2024/7645490
Tetsuya Muto,Masaaki Sakamoto,Shigeki Machida,Shinichiro Imaizumi,Tetsuju Sekiryu
{"title":"Effect of Vitreous Reflux after Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection for Macular Edema with Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Real-World Study.","authors":"Tetsuya Muto,Masaaki Sakamoto,Shigeki Machida,Shinichiro Imaizumi,Tetsuju Sekiryu","doi":"10.1155/2024/7645490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\r\nThis study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effect of vitreous reflux (VR) after intravitreal aflibercept injection (IVAI) for macular edema (ME) following naïve branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).\r\n\r\nMethods\r\nEighty patients with ME following BRVO were divided into three groups according to the conjunctival bleb diameter after IVAI as follows: group A (no VR), group; B (<3 mm VR), and group C (>3 mm VR). Each patient received single IVAI. The treatment response was evaluated with the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography measurements of the retinal foveal thickness (RFT) before treatment and 1 month after the first injection. RFT >375 μm was defined as recurrence and received additional IVAI. The recurrence rate of ME and total numbers of IVAI were investigated at 12 months.\r\n\r\nResults\r\nThe BCVA values at 1 month were 0.17 ± 0.29 in group A (n = 41), 0.18 ± 0.17 in group B (n = 18), and 0.19 ± 0.26 in group C (n = 21). The RFT at 1 month were 270 ± 45 μm in group A, 279 ± 24 μm in group B, and 290 ± 43 μm in group C, respectively. ME recurred in 29 out of 41 patients in group A, 15 out of 18 in group B, and 14 out of 21 in group C. The total numbers of IVAI were 2.50 ± 1.24 in group A, 2.59 ± 1.06 in group B, and 2.29 ± 1.27 in group C, respectively. In the above mentioned comparisons, no significant differences were found following an IVAI (P > 0.05).\r\n\r\nConclusions\r\nVR after IVAI did not affect the therapeutic effect in patients with ME following BRVO. Thus, we do not need to pay excess attention to VR in the case of IVAI.","PeriodicalId":16674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/7645490","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effect of vitreous reflux (VR) after intravitreal aflibercept injection (IVAI) for macular edema (ME) following naïve branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). Methods Eighty patients with ME following BRVO were divided into three groups according to the conjunctival bleb diameter after IVAI as follows: group A (no VR), group; B (<3 mm VR), and group C (>3 mm VR). Each patient received single IVAI. The treatment response was evaluated with the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography measurements of the retinal foveal thickness (RFT) before treatment and 1 month after the first injection. RFT >375 μm was defined as recurrence and received additional IVAI. The recurrence rate of ME and total numbers of IVAI were investigated at 12 months. Results The BCVA values at 1 month were 0.17 ± 0.29 in group A (n = 41), 0.18 ± 0.17 in group B (n = 18), and 0.19 ± 0.26 in group C (n = 21). The RFT at 1 month were 270 ± 45 μm in group A, 279 ± 24 μm in group B, and 290 ± 43 μm in group C, respectively. ME recurred in 29 out of 41 patients in group A, 15 out of 18 in group B, and 14 out of 21 in group C. The total numbers of IVAI were 2.50 ± 1.24 in group A, 2.59 ± 1.06 in group B, and 2.29 ± 1.27 in group C, respectively. In the above mentioned comparisons, no significant differences were found following an IVAI (P > 0.05). Conclusions VR after IVAI did not affect the therapeutic effect in patients with ME following BRVO. Thus, we do not need to pay excess attention to VR in the case of IVAI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
玻璃体内注射 Aflibercept 治疗视网膜静脉分支闭塞性黄斑水肿后玻璃体回流的影响:真实世界研究。
目的 本研究旨在评估玻璃体回流(VR)在玻璃体内注射阿弗利百普(aflibercept)(IVAI)治疗新生视网膜分支静脉闭塞(BRVO)后黄斑水肿(ME)的疗效。方法 根据IVAI后结膜虹膜直径的不同,将80例BRVO后ME患者分为三组:A组(无VR)、B组(3 mm VR)。每名患者接受一次 IVAI。治疗前和首次注射后 1 个月,用最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和光学相干断层扫描测量视网膜眼窝厚度(RFT)来评估治疗反应。RFT >375 μm被定义为复发,并接受额外的IVAI治疗。结果 A组(41 人)1 个月后的 BCVA 值为 0.17 ± 0.29,B 组(18 人)为 0.18 ± 0.17,C 组(21 人)为 0.19 ± 0.26。1 个月时,A 组的 RFT 分别为 270 ± 45 μm,B 组为 279 ± 24 μm,C 组为 290 ± 43 μm。A组41名患者中有29人复发ME,B组18人中有15人复发ME,C组21人中有14人复发ME,IVAI总数分别为2.50±1.24(A组)、2.59±1.06(B组)和2.29±1.27(C组)。在上述比较中,IVAI 后无明显差异(P > 0.05)。因此,在进行 IVAI 时,我们无需过分关注 VR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ophthalmology
Journal of Ophthalmology MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-OPHTHALMOLOGY
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to the anatomy, physiology and diseases of the eye. Submissions should focus on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, as well as clinical trials and research findings.
期刊最新文献
MicroRNA Regulation for Inflammasomes in High Glucose-Treated ARPE-19 Cells. Axial Length Shortening after Combined Repeated Low-Level Red-Light Therapy in Poor Responders of Orthokeratology in Myopic Children. Characteristics of Peripheral Retinal Refraction and Its Role in Children with Different Refractive States. The Association of Myopia Progression with Changes in Retinal Thickness among Primary School Students with Myopia. Neural Changes after Vision Therapy in Convergence Insufficiency: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1