{"title":"A sparse resolution of the DiPerna-Majda gap problem for $2$D Euler equations","authors":"Oscar Domínguez, Daniel Spector","doi":"arxiv-2409.02344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A central question which originates in the celebrated work in the 1980's of\nDiPerna and Majda asks what is the optimal decay $f > 0$ such that uniform\nrates $|\\omega|(Q) \\leq f(|Q|)$ of the vorticity maximal functions guarantee\nstrong convergence without concentrations of approximate solutions to\nenergy-conserving weak solutions of the $2$D Euler equations with vortex sheet\ninitial data. A famous result of Majda (1993) shows $f(r) = [\\log\n(1/r)]^{-1/2}$, $r<1/2$, as the optimal decay for \\emph{distinguished} sign\nvortex sheets. In the general setting of \\emph{mixed} sign vortex sheets,\nDiPerna and Majda (1987) established $f(r) = [\\log (1/r)]^{-\\alpha}$ with\n$\\alpha > 1$ as a sufficient condition for the lack of concentrations, while\nthe expected gap $\\alpha \\in (1/2, 1]$ remains as an open question. In this\npaper we resolve the DiPerna-Majda $2$D gap problem: In striking contrast to\nthe well-known case of distinguished sign vortex sheets, we identify $f(r) =\n[\\log (1/r)]^{-1}$ as the optimal regularity for mixed sign vortex sheets that\nrules out concentrations. For the proof, we propose a novel method to construct explicitly solutions\nwith mixed sign to the $2$D Euler equations in such a way that wild behaviour\ncreates within the relevant geometry of \\emph{sparse} cubes (i.e., these cubes\nare not necessarily pairwise disjoint, but their possible overlappings can be\ncontrolled in a sharp fashion). Such a strategy is inspired by the recent work\nof the first author and Milman \\cite{DM} where strong connections between\nenergy conservation and sparseness are established.","PeriodicalId":501036,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - MATH - Functional Analysis","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - MATH - Functional Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.02344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A central question which originates in the celebrated work in the 1980's of
DiPerna and Majda asks what is the optimal decay $f > 0$ such that uniform
rates $|\omega|(Q) \leq f(|Q|)$ of the vorticity maximal functions guarantee
strong convergence without concentrations of approximate solutions to
energy-conserving weak solutions of the $2$D Euler equations with vortex sheet
initial data. A famous result of Majda (1993) shows $f(r) = [\log
(1/r)]^{-1/2}$, $r<1/2$, as the optimal decay for \emph{distinguished} sign
vortex sheets. In the general setting of \emph{mixed} sign vortex sheets,
DiPerna and Majda (1987) established $f(r) = [\log (1/r)]^{-\alpha}$ with
$\alpha > 1$ as a sufficient condition for the lack of concentrations, while
the expected gap $\alpha \in (1/2, 1]$ remains as an open question. In this
paper we resolve the DiPerna-Majda $2$D gap problem: In striking contrast to
the well-known case of distinguished sign vortex sheets, we identify $f(r) =
[\log (1/r)]^{-1}$ as the optimal regularity for mixed sign vortex sheets that
rules out concentrations. For the proof, we propose a novel method to construct explicitly solutions
with mixed sign to the $2$D Euler equations in such a way that wild behaviour
creates within the relevant geometry of \emph{sparse} cubes (i.e., these cubes
are not necessarily pairwise disjoint, but their possible overlappings can be
controlled in a sharp fashion). Such a strategy is inspired by the recent work
of the first author and Milman \cite{DM} where strong connections between
energy conservation and sparseness are established.