Enhancing Student Engagement and Outcomes: The Effects of Cooperative Learning in an Ethiopian University’s Classrooms

IF 2.5 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Education Sciences Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.3390/educsci14090975
Tefera Tadesse, Hashim Ware, Aregu Asmare, Robyn M. Gillies
{"title":"Enhancing Student Engagement and Outcomes: The Effects of Cooperative Learning in an Ethiopian University’s Classrooms","authors":"Tefera Tadesse, Hashim Ware, Aregu Asmare, Robyn M. Gillies","doi":"10.3390/educsci14090975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on social interdependence and social constructivism theories, the authors of this study examined the effects of a cooperative learning (CL) pedagogical model on the engagement and outcomes of undergraduate students in an Ethiopian university’s classrooms. We did this by using a quasi-experimental post-test control group design. The study participants included undergraduate students enrolled in the courses “Risk Management and Insurance” (n = 99) and “Foundation Engineering I” (n = 94). The control groups received regular lecture-based teaching, while the experimental group received CL instruction over two weeks in six to eight sessions. The results from the Management sample, which demonstrated that the CL intervention group reported significantly higher learning outcomes and more engagement than the control groups, are sufficient evidence for the study to validate the hypothesis. The effect sizes were moderate and ranged from 0.52 to 0.78 Cohen’s d. In the Engineering course, the results demonstrate the smallest difference between the mean scores reported by the CL group and those of the regular lecture group, with the CL group showing slightly higher student engagement and outcomes across the three categories assessed. The Engineering sample’s results, however, did not show any significant differences between the CL and control groups. This study provides evidence that course reform utilizing a CL pedagogical design could improve student engagement and learning outcomes as compared to the regular lecture-based method. By incorporating CL pedagogies, higher educators and institutions can create more engaging and effective learning environments for students.","PeriodicalId":11472,"journal":{"name":"Education Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14090975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on social interdependence and social constructivism theories, the authors of this study examined the effects of a cooperative learning (CL) pedagogical model on the engagement and outcomes of undergraduate students in an Ethiopian university’s classrooms. We did this by using a quasi-experimental post-test control group design. The study participants included undergraduate students enrolled in the courses “Risk Management and Insurance” (n = 99) and “Foundation Engineering I” (n = 94). The control groups received regular lecture-based teaching, while the experimental group received CL instruction over two weeks in six to eight sessions. The results from the Management sample, which demonstrated that the CL intervention group reported significantly higher learning outcomes and more engagement than the control groups, are sufficient evidence for the study to validate the hypothesis. The effect sizes were moderate and ranged from 0.52 to 0.78 Cohen’s d. In the Engineering course, the results demonstrate the smallest difference between the mean scores reported by the CL group and those of the regular lecture group, with the CL group showing slightly higher student engagement and outcomes across the three categories assessed. The Engineering sample’s results, however, did not show any significant differences between the CL and control groups. This study provides evidence that course reform utilizing a CL pedagogical design could improve student engagement and learning outcomes as compared to the regular lecture-based method. By incorporating CL pedagogies, higher educators and institutions can create more engaging and effective learning environments for students.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高学生参与度和成果:埃塞俄比亚大学课堂合作学习的效果
基于社会相互依存和社会建构主义理论,本研究的作者考察了合作学习(CL)教学模式对埃塞俄比亚一所大学本科生课堂参与度和学习成果的影响。我们采用了准实验性的后测对照组设计。研究对象包括选修 "风险管理与保险"(99 人)和 "基础工程 I"(94 人)课程的本科生。对照组接受常规的讲授式教学,而实验组则接受为期两周、分六至八次进行的 CL 教学。管理样本的结果表明,CL 干预组的学习成果显著高于对照组,参与度也更高,这足以证明该研究验证了假设。在工程学课程中,结果表明,CL 组与常规授课组的平均得分差异最小,CL 组在三个评估类别中的学生参与度和成果略高。然而,工程学样本的结果显示,CL 组与对照组之间没有任何显著差异。本研究提供的证据表明,与常规的讲授法相比,采用CL教学法设计的课程改革可以提高学生的参与度和学习效果。通过采用CL教学法,高等教育者和机构可以为学生创造更有吸引力和更有效的学习环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Education Sciences
Education Sciences Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
770
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Online Pedagogies and the Middle Grades: A Scoping Review of the Literature Self-Regulation Profiles of Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers for Primary Education in Mathematical Problem-Solving Contexts Updating Calculus Teaching with AI: A Classroom Experience The Effects of Invented Spelling Instruction on Literacy Achievement and Writing Motivation Effectiveness of the Flipped Project-Based Learning Model Based on Moodle LMS to Improve Student Communication and Problem-Solving Skills in Learning Programming
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1