Re-Evaluating Components of Classical Educational Theories in AI-Enhanced Learning: An Empirical Study on Student Engagement

IF 2.5 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Education Sciences Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.3390/educsci14090974
László Bognár, György Ágoston, Anetta Bacsa-Bán, Tibor Fauszt, Gyula Gubán, Antal Joós, Levente Zsolt Juhász, Edina Kocsó, Endre Kovács, Edit Maczó, Anita Irén Mihálovicsné Kollár, Györgyi Strauber
{"title":"Re-Evaluating Components of Classical Educational Theories in AI-Enhanced Learning: An Empirical Study on Student Engagement","authors":"László Bognár, György Ágoston, Anetta Bacsa-Bán, Tibor Fauszt, Gyula Gubán, Antal Joós, Levente Zsolt Juhász, Edina Kocsó, Endre Kovács, Edit Maczó, Anita Irén Mihálovicsné Kollár, Györgyi Strauber","doi":"10.3390/educsci14090974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The primary goal of this research was to empirically identify and validate the factors influencing student engagement in a learning environment where AI-based chat tools, such as ChatGPT or other large language models (LLMs), are intensively integrated into the curriculum and teaching–learning process. Traditional educational theories provide a robust framework for understanding diverse dimensions of student engagement, but the integration of AI-based tools offers new personalized learning experiences, immediate feedback, and resource accessibility that necessitate a contemporary exploration of these foundational concepts. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was utilized to uncover the underlying factor structure within a large set of variables, and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was employed to verify the factor structure identified by EFA. Four new factors have been identified: “Academic Self-Efficacy and Preparedness”, “Autonomy and Resource Utilization”, “Interest and Engagement”, and “Self-Regulation and Goal Setting.” Based on these factors, a new engagement measuring scale has been developed to comprehensively assess student engagement in AI-enhanced learning environments.","PeriodicalId":11472,"journal":{"name":"Education Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14090974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The primary goal of this research was to empirically identify and validate the factors influencing student engagement in a learning environment where AI-based chat tools, such as ChatGPT or other large language models (LLMs), are intensively integrated into the curriculum and teaching–learning process. Traditional educational theories provide a robust framework for understanding diverse dimensions of student engagement, but the integration of AI-based tools offers new personalized learning experiences, immediate feedback, and resource accessibility that necessitate a contemporary exploration of these foundational concepts. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was utilized to uncover the underlying factor structure within a large set of variables, and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was employed to verify the factor structure identified by EFA. Four new factors have been identified: “Academic Self-Efficacy and Preparedness”, “Autonomy and Resource Utilization”, “Interest and Engagement”, and “Self-Regulation and Goal Setting.” Based on these factors, a new engagement measuring scale has been developed to comprehensively assess student engagement in AI-enhanced learning environments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新评估人工智能强化学习中经典教育理论的组成部分:学生参与度实证研究
本研究的主要目标是通过实证方法确定和验证影响学生在学习环境中参与度的因素,在这种环境中,基于人工智能的聊天工具(如 ChatGPT 或其他大型语言模型 (LLM) )被集中整合到课程和教学过程中。传统的教育理论为理解学生参与的不同层面提供了一个强有力的框架,但基于人工智能的工具的整合提供了新的个性化学习体验、即时反馈和资源可访问性,因此有必要对这些基础概念进行当代探索。我们利用探索性因子分析(EFA)来揭示大量变量中的潜在因子结构,并利用确认性因子分析(CFA)来验证 EFA 所确定的因子结构。确定了四个新的因子:"学术自我效能和准备"、"自主和资源利用"、"兴趣和参与 "以及 "自我调节和目标设定"。在这些因素的基础上,开发了一个新的参与度测量量表,以全面评估学生在人工智能增强型学习环境中的参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Education Sciences
Education Sciences Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
770
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Online Pedagogies and the Middle Grades: A Scoping Review of the Literature Self-Regulation Profiles of Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers for Primary Education in Mathematical Problem-Solving Contexts Updating Calculus Teaching with AI: A Classroom Experience The Effects of Invented Spelling Instruction on Literacy Achievement and Writing Motivation Effectiveness of the Flipped Project-Based Learning Model Based on Moodle LMS to Improve Student Communication and Problem-Solving Skills in Learning Programming
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1