MRI accuracy for recurrence after partial gland ablation with HIFU for localized prostate cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1038/s41391-024-00885-1
Denis Séguier, Philippe Puech, Eric Barret, Xavier Leroy, Julien Labreuche, Raphael Renard Penna, Guillaume Ploussard, Arnauld Villers, Jonathan Olivier
{"title":"MRI accuracy for recurrence after partial gland ablation with HIFU for localized prostate cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Denis Séguier, Philippe Puech, Eric Barret, Xavier Leroy, Julien Labreuche, Raphael Renard Penna, Guillaume Ploussard, Arnauld Villers, Jonathan Olivier","doi":"10.1038/s41391-024-00885-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Prostate cancer remains the most frequently diagnosed cancer among men. High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) has emerged as a thermal ablative technique for partial-gland-ablation (PGA), aiming to minimize collateral damage while maximizing tumor control. Monitoring after HIFU PGA relies on serial PSA testing, multiparametric-MRI, and biopsies. The diagnostic accuracy of MRI for clinically-significant cancer(csPCa) recurrence is challenging.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective</h3><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the accuracy of MRI in detecting early recurrence of localized prostate cancer following HIFU PGA.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted until May 8<sup>th</sup> 2024 using MEDLINE and Scopus. The inclusion criteria encompassed randomized controlled trials and cohort studies involving men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer who had as primary treatment HIFU PGA. The primary outcome measures included the sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value (PPV), and negative-predictive value (NPV) of MRI for csPCa(ISUP ≥ 2) based on biopsy results. We pooled data from studies with sufficient csPCa and csPCa-free patients (≥5) post HIFU for statistical analysis.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Fifteen studies meet the inclusion criteria, encompassing 1093 patients and 12 studies were eligible for meta-analysis. MRI sensitivity in detecting clinically-significant prostate cancer (csPCa) recurrence post HIFU PGA varied widely (0–89%), with a pooled sensitivity of 0.52 (95% CI:0.36–0.68). Specificity ranged from 44% to 100%, with a pooled specificity of 0.81 (95% CI:0.68–0.91). The pooled NPV was 0.82 (95% CI:0.72–0.90), and the pooled PPV was 0.50 (95% CI:0.35–0.65). Three studies reported in-field diagnostic performance with sensitivities ranging from 0.42 to 0.80 and specificities from 0.45 to 0.97.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>MRI accuracy for clinically-significant recurrence after partial gland ablation with HIFU for localized prostate cancer shows low diagnostic performance in the treated lobe with pooled sensitivity of 0.52 (95% CI:0.36–0.68) and specificity of 0.81 (95% CI:0.68–0.91). Limits of this review include the low number of studies reporting about site of recurrence in or out of the treated lobe.</p>","PeriodicalId":20727,"journal":{"name":"Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-024-00885-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Prostate cancer remains the most frequently diagnosed cancer among men. High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) has emerged as a thermal ablative technique for partial-gland-ablation (PGA), aiming to minimize collateral damage while maximizing tumor control. Monitoring after HIFU PGA relies on serial PSA testing, multiparametric-MRI, and biopsies. The diagnostic accuracy of MRI for clinically-significant cancer(csPCa) recurrence is challenging.

Objective

This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the accuracy of MRI in detecting early recurrence of localized prostate cancer following HIFU PGA.

Methods

Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted until May 8th 2024 using MEDLINE and Scopus. The inclusion criteria encompassed randomized controlled trials and cohort studies involving men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer who had as primary treatment HIFU PGA. The primary outcome measures included the sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value (PPV), and negative-predictive value (NPV) of MRI for csPCa(ISUP ≥ 2) based on biopsy results. We pooled data from studies with sufficient csPCa and csPCa-free patients (≥5) post HIFU for statistical analysis.

Results

Fifteen studies meet the inclusion criteria, encompassing 1093 patients and 12 studies were eligible for meta-analysis. MRI sensitivity in detecting clinically-significant prostate cancer (csPCa) recurrence post HIFU PGA varied widely (0–89%), with a pooled sensitivity of 0.52 (95% CI:0.36–0.68). Specificity ranged from 44% to 100%, with a pooled specificity of 0.81 (95% CI:0.68–0.91). The pooled NPV was 0.82 (95% CI:0.72–0.90), and the pooled PPV was 0.50 (95% CI:0.35–0.65). Three studies reported in-field diagnostic performance with sensitivities ranging from 0.42 to 0.80 and specificities from 0.45 to 0.97.

Conclusion

MRI accuracy for clinically-significant recurrence after partial gland ablation with HIFU for localized prostate cancer shows low diagnostic performance in the treated lobe with pooled sensitivity of 0.52 (95% CI:0.36–0.68) and specificity of 0.81 (95% CI:0.68–0.91). Limits of this review include the low number of studies reporting about site of recurrence in or out of the treated lobe.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
磁共振成像对局部前列腺癌 HIFU 部分腺体消融术后复发的准确性。系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景前列腺癌仍然是男性中最常见的癌症。高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)已成为部分腺体消融(PGA)的一种热烧蚀技术,其目的是在最大限度地控制肿瘤的同时将附带损伤降至最低。HIFU PGA术后的监测主要依靠连续的PSA检测、多参数磁共振成像和活检。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估磁共振成像在检测 HIFU PGA 术后局部前列腺癌早期复发方面的准确性。方法根据 PRISMA 指南,使用 MEDLINE 和 Scopus 对截至 2024 年 5 月 8 日的文献进行了全面检索。纳入标准包括随机对照试验和队列研究,这些研究涉及以 HIFU PGA 为主要治疗方法的男性局部前列腺癌患者。主要结果指标包括基于活检结果的 MRI 对 csPCa(ISUP ≥ 2)的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值 (PPV) 和阴性预测值 (NPV)。我们汇集了HIFU术后有足够csPCa和无csPCa患者(≥5例)的研究数据进行统计分析。结果15项研究符合纳入标准,涵盖1093例患者,12项研究符合荟萃分析条件。磁共振成像在检测HIFU PGA术后有临床意义的前列腺癌(csPCa)复发方面的灵敏度差异很大(0-89%),汇总灵敏度为0.52(95% CI:0.36-0.68)。特异性从 44% 到 100% 不等,汇总特异性为 0.81 (95% CI:0.68-0.91)。集合 NPV 为 0.82(95% CI:0.72-0.90),集合 PPV 为 0.50(95% CI:0.35-0.65)。三项研究报告了现场诊断性能,灵敏度从0.42到0.80不等,特异性从0.45到0.97不等。结论用HIFU进行部分腺体消融治疗局部前列腺癌后,RRI对有临床意义的复发的准确性显示出治疗叶的诊断性能较低,汇总灵敏度为0.52 (95% CI:0.36-0.68),特异性为0.81 (95% CI:0.68-0.91)。本综述的局限性在于,报告治疗腺叶内外复发部位的研究数量较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
142
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases covers all aspects of prostatic diseases, in particular prostate cancer, the subject of intensive basic and clinical research world-wide. The journal also reports on exciting new developments being made in diagnosis, surgery, radiotherapy, drug discovery and medical management. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases is of interest to surgeons, oncologists and clinicians treating patients and to those involved in research into diseases of the prostate. The journal covers the three main areas - prostate cancer, male LUTS and prostatitis. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases publishes original research articles, reviews, topical comment and critical appraisals of scientific meetings and the latest books. The journal also contains a calendar of forthcoming scientific meetings. The Editors and a distinguished Editorial Board ensure that submitted articles receive fast and efficient attention and are refereed to the highest possible scientific standard. A fast track system is available for topical articles of particular significance.
期刊最新文献
Comprehensive review of cardiovascular disease in prostate cancer: epidemiology, risk factors, therapeutics and prevention strategies. Overcoming barriers to prostate cancer genetic testing: who, when, and how. Follow-up on patients with initial negative mpMRI target and systematic biopsy for PI-RADS ≥ 3 lesions - an EAU-YAU study enhancing prostate cancer detection. Prostate cancer detection: achieving an optimal balance. Established focal therapy-HIFU, IRE, or cryotherapy-where are we now?-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1