Effects of Psychoeducation on Caregivers of Individuals Experiencing Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING International Journal of Mental Health Nursing Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1111/inm.13421
Jin Yin Alicia Chow, Yu Ting Tracy Yeo, Yong Shian Goh
{"title":"Effects of Psychoeducation on Caregivers of Individuals Experiencing Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis","authors":"Jin Yin Alicia Chow, Yu Ting Tracy Yeo, Yong Shian Goh","doi":"10.1111/inm.13421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The existing paradigm on recovery in mental health prioritises self‐empowerment and person‐centred, community‐based care, which necessitates family caregivers' collaboration to support individuals with schizophrenia in the community. However, the role of family caregivers is often under‐recognised and hence insufficiently supported. This consequently compromises caregivers' well‐being and, ultimately, the recovery of individuals with schizophrenia. Although caregiver‐targeted psychoeducation may offer practical support, its effectiveness lacks conclusive evidence. This review aimed to evaluate the impacts of psychoeducation on caregiver‐related outcomes (caregiver burden, quality of life and expressed emotion). Eight electronic databases were searched from inception to September 2023, supplemented by hand searching of end‐reference lists. Two reviewers independently conducted title and abstract screening with predetermined eligibility criteria. A third reviewer was consulted to resolve any discrepancies. A random‐effects meta‐analysis was performed to estimate pooled effect sizes alongside subgroup and sensitivity analyses where appropriate. Twenty‐one studies (totalling 1639 caregivers) were included, based on which psychoeducation contributed to a statistically significant improvement in caregiver‐related outcomes. Given substantial heterogeneity, subgroup and sensitivity analyses were done for the durations and the evaluative scales for psychoeducation. Quality appraisal revealed unclear or high bias in most studies. Notwithstanding the heterogeneity, the directions of the effect sizes consistently indicated the effectiveness of psychoeducation across all outcomes. This finding aligned with Lazarus' stress appraisal and coping theory, which states that psychoeducation improves caregivers' knowledge, coping mechanisms and situation appraisal. Our findings offer encouraging evidence to advocate the integration of psychoeducation into healthcare services, but policy‐based support is warranted for sustained implementation. Further research is merited to optimise its duration and content and appraise its long‐term impacts through disease‐specific scales for objective and subjective outcomes.","PeriodicalId":14007,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.13421","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The existing paradigm on recovery in mental health prioritises self‐empowerment and person‐centred, community‐based care, which necessitates family caregivers' collaboration to support individuals with schizophrenia in the community. However, the role of family caregivers is often under‐recognised and hence insufficiently supported. This consequently compromises caregivers' well‐being and, ultimately, the recovery of individuals with schizophrenia. Although caregiver‐targeted psychoeducation may offer practical support, its effectiveness lacks conclusive evidence. This review aimed to evaluate the impacts of psychoeducation on caregiver‐related outcomes (caregiver burden, quality of life and expressed emotion). Eight electronic databases were searched from inception to September 2023, supplemented by hand searching of end‐reference lists. Two reviewers independently conducted title and abstract screening with predetermined eligibility criteria. A third reviewer was consulted to resolve any discrepancies. A random‐effects meta‐analysis was performed to estimate pooled effect sizes alongside subgroup and sensitivity analyses where appropriate. Twenty‐one studies (totalling 1639 caregivers) were included, based on which psychoeducation contributed to a statistically significant improvement in caregiver‐related outcomes. Given substantial heterogeneity, subgroup and sensitivity analyses were done for the durations and the evaluative scales for psychoeducation. Quality appraisal revealed unclear or high bias in most studies. Notwithstanding the heterogeneity, the directions of the effect sizes consistently indicated the effectiveness of psychoeducation across all outcomes. This finding aligned with Lazarus' stress appraisal and coping theory, which states that psychoeducation improves caregivers' knowledge, coping mechanisms and situation appraisal. Our findings offer encouraging evidence to advocate the integration of psychoeducation into healthcare services, but policy‐based support is warranted for sustained implementation. Further research is merited to optimise its duration and content and appraise its long‐term impacts through disease‐specific scales for objective and subjective outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心理教育对精神分裂症患者照顾者的影响:系统回顾与元分析
现有的精神健康康复模式将自我赋权和以人为本、以社区为基础的护理放在首位,这就需要家庭照护者通力合作,为社区中的精神分裂症患者提供支持。然而,家庭照护者的作用往往得不到充分的认可,因而也得不到足够的支持。这就损害了照护者的福祉,并最终影响到精神分裂症患者的康复。虽然针对照顾者的心理教育可以提供实际支持,但其有效性却缺乏确凿证据。本综述旨在评估心理教育对照护者相关结果(照护者负担、生活质量和情感表达)的影响。我们检索了从开始到 2023 年 9 月的八个电子数据库,并对最终参考文献列表进行了人工检索。两名审稿人按照预先确定的资格标准独立进行了标题和摘要筛选。如有任何不一致之处,会咨询第三位审稿人。我们进行了随机效应荟萃分析,以估计汇总效应大小,并酌情进行了亚组分析和敏感性分析。共纳入 21 项研究(共计 1639 名护理人员),根据这些研究,心理教育对改善护理人员相关结果有显著的统计学意义。鉴于存在大量异质性,我们对心理教育的持续时间和评价量表进行了分组分析和敏感性分析。质量评估显示,大多数研究存在不明确或高度偏倚。尽管存在异质性,但效应大小的方向一致表明心理教育对所有结果都有效。这一发现与拉扎勒斯的压力评估和应对理论相吻合,该理论认为心理教育可以改善护理人员的知识、应对机制和情况评估。我们的研究结果为倡导将心理教育纳入医疗保健服务提供了令人鼓舞的证据,但要持续实施心理教育,还需要政策支持。我们还需要进一步开展研究,以优化心理教育的持续时间和内容,并通过针对特定疾病的客观和主观结果量表来评估心理教育的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
8.90%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing is the official journal of the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc. It is a fully refereed journal that examines current trends and developments in mental health practice and research. The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing provides a forum for the exchange of ideas on all issues of relevance to mental health nursing. The Journal informs you of developments in mental health nursing practice and research, directions in education and training, professional issues, management approaches, policy development, ethical questions, theoretical inquiry, and clinical issues. The Journal publishes feature articles, review articles, clinical notes, research notes and book reviews. Contributions on any aspect of mental health nursing are welcomed. Statements and opinions expressed in the journal reflect the views of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Recognising and responding to loneliness in older people Professional Quality of Life Among Mental Health Nurses: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis Effects of Psychoeducation on Caregivers of Individuals Experiencing Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis Emergency Department Use Following Self‐Harm and Suicide Ideation: An Analysis of the Influence of Cultural and/or Linguistic Diversity Using Data From the Self‐Harm Monitoring System for Victoria (2012–2019)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1