Multidisciplinary optimization methodology for truss-braced wing aircraft using high-fidelity structure sizing

Saeed Hosseini, Mohammad Ali Vaziry-Zanjany, Hamid Reza Ovesy
{"title":"Multidisciplinary optimization methodology for truss-braced wing aircraft using high-fidelity structure sizing","authors":"Saeed Hosseini, Mohammad Ali Vaziry-Zanjany, Hamid Reza Ovesy","doi":"10.1177/09544100241278997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this research, a method is developed to optimize the truss-braced wing aircraft configuration in a multidisciplinary design framework. Physics-based high-fidelity methods, that can capture the nature of the configuration changes, are employed for the disciplines where the existing classical methods are not reliable. High-fidelity geometry modeling, structure loading, structure optimization, and aeroelastic sizing methods are integrated into the aircraft multidisciplinary design and optimization. The developed algorithm is applied for the multi-objective optimization of a regional jet aircraft to minimize the cost and weight. The results demonstrate that the cost-optimum solution converges to a higher aspect ratio wing equipped with a higher bypass ratio engine, and a 7.94% reduction in the direct operating cost can be achieved. On the other hand, the weight-optimum wing planform tends to a slightly lower aspect ratio wing with a lower bypass ratio engine, while a 6.18% reduction in take-off weight is achieved. In addition to that, the findings of this study highlight the considerable effect that the engine technology has on the optimum layout, which suggests that the engine technology and its performance should also be a part of the design optimization process. The developed modular framework offers further optimization potential for the truss-braced wing aircraft, as more detailed models can be integrated.","PeriodicalId":54566,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G-Journal of Aerospace Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G-Journal of Aerospace Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09544100241278997","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this research, a method is developed to optimize the truss-braced wing aircraft configuration in a multidisciplinary design framework. Physics-based high-fidelity methods, that can capture the nature of the configuration changes, are employed for the disciplines where the existing classical methods are not reliable. High-fidelity geometry modeling, structure loading, structure optimization, and aeroelastic sizing methods are integrated into the aircraft multidisciplinary design and optimization. The developed algorithm is applied for the multi-objective optimization of a regional jet aircraft to minimize the cost and weight. The results demonstrate that the cost-optimum solution converges to a higher aspect ratio wing equipped with a higher bypass ratio engine, and a 7.94% reduction in the direct operating cost can be achieved. On the other hand, the weight-optimum wing planform tends to a slightly lower aspect ratio wing with a lower bypass ratio engine, while a 6.18% reduction in take-off weight is achieved. In addition to that, the findings of this study highlight the considerable effect that the engine technology has on the optimum layout, which suggests that the engine technology and its performance should also be a part of the design optimization process. The developed modular framework offers further optimization potential for the truss-braced wing aircraft, as more detailed models can be integrated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用高保真结构尺寸的桁架式机翼飞机多学科优化方法
本研究开发了一种在多学科设计框架下优化桁架式机翼飞机构型的方法。在现有经典方法不可靠的学科中,采用了基于物理的高保真方法,这种方法可以捕捉到构型变化的本质。高保真几何建模、结构加载、结构优化和气动弹性选型方法被集成到飞机多学科设计和优化中。所开发的算法被应用于支线喷气式飞机的多目标优化,以最小化成本和重量。结果表明,成本最优解趋近于采用高宽比机翼和高旁通比发动机,直接运营成本可降低 7.94%。另一方面,重量最优翼型趋向于略低长宽比的机翼,配备较低旁通比的发动机,起飞重量减少了 6.18%。除此以外,本研究结果还强调了发动机技术对最佳布局的重要影响,这表明发动机技术及其性能也应成为设计优化过程的一部分。开发的模块化框架为桁架式机翼飞机提供了进一步优化的潜力,因为可以集成更详细的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
212
审稿时长
5.7 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aerospace Engineering is dedicated to the publication of high quality research in all branches of applied sciences and technology dealing with aircraft and spacecraft, and their support systems. "Our authorship is truly international and all efforts are made to ensure that each paper is presented in the best possible way and reaches a wide audience. "The Editorial Board is composed of recognized experts representing the technical communities of fifteen countries. The Board Members work in close cooperation with the editors, reviewers, and authors to achieve a consistent standard of well written and presented papers."Professor Rodrigo Martinez-Val, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Fatigue life analysis of a composite materials structure using allowable strain criteria Feasibility study of carbon-fiber reinforced polymer linerless pressure vessel tank Testability modeling of aeroengine and analysis optimization method based on improved correlation matrix Research on a backstepping flight control method improved by STFT in atmospheric disturbance applications Evaluating the effect of frigate hangar shape modifications on helicopter recovery using piloted flight simulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1