Development and validation of a realistic type III esophageal atresia simulator for the training of pediatric surgeons

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Pediatric Surgery International Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1007/s00383-024-05827-5
Javier Arredondo Montero, Blanca Paola Pérez Riveros, Oscar Emilio Bueso Asfura, Nerea Martín-Calvo, Francisco Javier Pueyo, Nicolás López de Aguileta Castaño
{"title":"Development and validation of a realistic type III esophageal atresia simulator for the training of pediatric surgeons","authors":"Javier Arredondo Montero, Blanca Paola Pérez Riveros, Oscar Emilio Bueso Asfura, Nerea Martín-Calvo, Francisco Javier Pueyo, Nicolás López de Aguileta Castaño","doi":"10.1007/s00383-024-05827-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>The technical complexity and limited casuistry of neonatal surgical pathology limit the possibilities of developing the necessary technical competencies by specialists in training. Esophageal atresia constitutes the paradigm of this problem. The use of synthetic 3D models for training is a promising line of research, although the literature is limited.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We conceptualized, designed, and produced an anatomically realistic model for the open correction of type III oesophageal atresia. We validated it with two groups of participants (experts and non-experts) through face, construct, and content-validity questionnaires.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The model was validated by nine experts and nine non-experts. The mean procedure time for the experts and non-experts groups was 34.0 and 38.4 min, respectively. Two non-experts did not complete the procedure at the designed time (45 min). Regarding the face validity questionnaire, the mean rating of the model was 3.2 out of 4. Regarding the construct validity, we found statistically significant differences between groups for the equidistance between sutures, 100% correct in the expert group vs. 42.9% correct in the non-expert group (<i>p</i> = 0.02), and for the item “Confirms that tracheoesophageal fistula closure is watertight before continuing the procedure”, correctly assessed by 66.7% of the experts vs. by 11.1% of non-experts (<i>p</i> = 0.05). Concerning content validity, the mean score was 3.3 out of 4 for the experts and 3.4 out of 4 for the non-experts.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>The present model is a cost-effective, simple-to-produce, and validated option for training open correction of type III esophageal atresia. However, future studies with larger sample sizes and blinded validators are needed before drawing definitive conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19832,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Surgery International","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Surgery International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-024-05827-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The technical complexity and limited casuistry of neonatal surgical pathology limit the possibilities of developing the necessary technical competencies by specialists in training. Esophageal atresia constitutes the paradigm of this problem. The use of synthetic 3D models for training is a promising line of research, although the literature is limited.

Methods

We conceptualized, designed, and produced an anatomically realistic model for the open correction of type III oesophageal atresia. We validated it with two groups of participants (experts and non-experts) through face, construct, and content-validity questionnaires.

Results

The model was validated by nine experts and nine non-experts. The mean procedure time for the experts and non-experts groups was 34.0 and 38.4 min, respectively. Two non-experts did not complete the procedure at the designed time (45 min). Regarding the face validity questionnaire, the mean rating of the model was 3.2 out of 4. Regarding the construct validity, we found statistically significant differences between groups for the equidistance between sutures, 100% correct in the expert group vs. 42.9% correct in the non-expert group (p = 0.02), and for the item “Confirms that tracheoesophageal fistula closure is watertight before continuing the procedure”, correctly assessed by 66.7% of the experts vs. by 11.1% of non-experts (p = 0.05). Concerning content validity, the mean score was 3.3 out of 4 for the experts and 3.4 out of 4 for the non-experts.

Conclusions

The present model is a cost-effective, simple-to-produce, and validated option for training open correction of type III esophageal atresia. However, future studies with larger sample sizes and blinded validators are needed before drawing definitive conclusions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发和验证用于培训小儿外科医生的逼真 III 型食道闭锁模拟器
背景新生儿外科病理学的技术复杂性和有限的病例限制了正在接受培训的专科医生发展必要技术能力的可能性。食道闭锁是这一问题的典型代表。方法我们构思、设计并制作了一个解剖逼真的模型,用于开放式矫正 III 型食道闭锁。我们通过对两组参与者(专家和非专家)进行表面、结构和内容有效性问卷调查,对该模型进行了验证。专家组和非专家组的平均程序时间分别为 34.0 分钟和 38.4 分钟。两名非专家没有在设计时间(45 分钟)内完成程序。在面效度问卷中,模型的平均评分为 3.2 分(满分 4 分)。在构造效度方面,我们发现各组之间在缝线间距的等距方面存在显著的统计学差异,专家组的正确率为 100%,而非专家组的正确率为 42.9%。在 "继续手术前确认气管食管瘘闭合不漏水 "这一项上,66.7% 的专家和 11.1%的非专家都能正确评估(P = 0.05)。在内容效度方面,专家的平均得分是 3.3 分(满分 4 分),非专家的平均得分是 3.4 分(满分 4 分)。然而,在得出明确结论之前,未来的研究还需要更大的样本量和盲法验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
215
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Surgery International is a journal devoted to the publication of new and important information from the entire spectrum of pediatric surgery. The major purpose of the journal is to promote postgraduate training and further education in the surgery of infants and children. The contents will include articles in clinical and experimental surgery, as well as related fields. One section of each issue is devoted to a special topic, with invited contributions from recognized authorities. Other sections will include: -Review articles- Original articles- Technical innovations- Letters to the editor
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of primary repair for low anorectal malformations in Uganda. Enteric neural stem cell neurogenesis by glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor in experimental Hirschsprung's disease. Genetic landscape of congenital pouch colon: systematic review and functional enrichment study. Re-do hypospadias surgery following failed previous repair: lessons learned over two decades of experience. Synergistic use of Unplanned Reoperation and Hospital Readmission rates for quality monitoring in pediatric surgical care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1