Sajjad Arzemanzadeh, Benjamin Zwick, Karol Miller, Tim Rosenow, Stuart I. Hodgetts, Adam Wittek
{"title":"Towards Determining Mechanical Properties of Brain-Skull Interface Under Tension and Compression","authors":"Sajjad Arzemanzadeh, Benjamin Zwick, Karol Miller, Tim Rosenow, Stuart I. Hodgetts, Adam Wittek","doi":"arxiv-2409.05365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Computational biomechanics models of the brain have become an important tool\nfor investigating the brain responses to mechanical loads. The geometry,\nloading conditions, and constitutive properties of such brain models are\nwell-studied and generally accepted. However, there is a lack of experimental\nevidence to support models of the layers of tissues (brain-skull interface)\nconnecting the brain with the skull which determine boundary conditions for the\nbrain. We present a new protocol for determining the biomechanical properties\nof the brain-skull interface and present the preliminary results (for a small\nnumber of tissue samples extracted from sheep cadaver heads). The method\nconsists of biomechanical experiments using brain tissue and brain-skull\ncomplex (consisting of the brain tissue, brain-skull interface, and skull bone)\nand comprehensive computer simulation of the experiments using the finite\nelement (FE) method. Application of the FE simulations allowed us to abandon\nthe traditionally used approaches that rely on analytical formulations that\nassume cuboidal (or cylindrical) sample geometry when determining the\nparameters that describe the biomechanical behaviour of the brain tissue and\nbrain-skull interface. In the simulations, we used accurate 3D geometry of the\nsamples obtained from magnetic resonance images (MRIs). Our results indicate\nthat the behaviour of the brain-skull interface under compressive loading\nappreciably differs from that under tension. Rupture of the interface was\nclearly visible for tensile load while no obvious indication of mechanical\nfailure was observed under compression. These results suggest that assuming a\nrigid connection or frictionless sliding contact between the brain tissue and\nskull bone, the approaches often used in computational biomechanics models of\nthe brain, may not accurately represent the mechanical behaviour of the\nbrain-skull interface.","PeriodicalId":501309,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.05365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Computational biomechanics models of the brain have become an important tool
for investigating the brain responses to mechanical loads. The geometry,
loading conditions, and constitutive properties of such brain models are
well-studied and generally accepted. However, there is a lack of experimental
evidence to support models of the layers of tissues (brain-skull interface)
connecting the brain with the skull which determine boundary conditions for the
brain. We present a new protocol for determining the biomechanical properties
of the brain-skull interface and present the preliminary results (for a small
number of tissue samples extracted from sheep cadaver heads). The method
consists of biomechanical experiments using brain tissue and brain-skull
complex (consisting of the brain tissue, brain-skull interface, and skull bone)
and comprehensive computer simulation of the experiments using the finite
element (FE) method. Application of the FE simulations allowed us to abandon
the traditionally used approaches that rely on analytical formulations that
assume cuboidal (or cylindrical) sample geometry when determining the
parameters that describe the biomechanical behaviour of the brain tissue and
brain-skull interface. In the simulations, we used accurate 3D geometry of the
samples obtained from magnetic resonance images (MRIs). Our results indicate
that the behaviour of the brain-skull interface under compressive loading
appreciably differs from that under tension. Rupture of the interface was
clearly visible for tensile load while no obvious indication of mechanical
failure was observed under compression. These results suggest that assuming a
rigid connection or frictionless sliding contact between the brain tissue and
skull bone, the approaches often used in computational biomechanics models of
the brain, may not accurately represent the mechanical behaviour of the
brain-skull interface.