Causal relationships between gut microbiota and polycystic ovarian syndrome: A bidirectional Mendelian randomization study

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1111/aogs.14957
Ruo-Lin Mao, Xiang-Fei Wang, Jue-Pu Zhou, Meng Wang, Rui Long, Lei Jin, Li-Xia Zhu
{"title":"Causal relationships between gut microbiota and polycystic ovarian syndrome: A bidirectional Mendelian randomization study","authors":"Ruo-Lin Mao,&nbsp;Xiang-Fei Wang,&nbsp;Jue-Pu Zhou,&nbsp;Meng Wang,&nbsp;Rui Long,&nbsp;Lei Jin,&nbsp;Li-Xia Zhu","doi":"10.1111/aogs.14957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Previous studies have established a link between gut microbiota and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), but little is known about their precise causal relationship. Therefore, this study aims to explore whether there are precise causal relationships between gut microbiota and PCOS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We performed a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. Datasets were from the largest published meta-analysis on gut microbiota composition and the FinnGen cohort of the IEU Open Genome-Wide Association Study Project database. Inverse variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger, constrained maximum likelihood-based Mendelian randomization, weighted median, weighted mode, and simple mode were used. Cochran's Q and MR-Egger intercept tests were employed to measure the heterogeneity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 211 gut microbiota taxa were identified in MR analysis. Nine taxa of bacteria, including Alphaproteobacteria (0.55, 0.30–0.99, <i>p</i> = 0.04), Bacilli (1.76, 1.07–2.91, <i>p</i> = 0.03), <i>Bilophila</i> (0.42, 0.23–0.77, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), <i>Blautia</i> (0.16, 0.03–0.79, <i>p</i> = 0.02), Burkholderiales (2.37, 1.22–4.62, <i>p</i> = 0.01), <i>Candidatus Soleaferrea</i> (0.65, 0.43–0.98, <i>p</i> = 0.04), Cyanobacteria (0.51, 0.31–0.83, <i>p</i> = 0.01), <i>Holdemania</i> (0.53, 0.35–0.81, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), and Lachnospiraceae (1.86, 1.04–3.35, <i>p</i> = 0.03), were found to be associated with PCOS in the above MR methods included at least IVW method. Cochran's <i>Q</i> statistics and MR-Egger intercept test suggested no significant heterogeneity. In addition, 69 taxa were shown significant for at least the IVW method in reverse MR analysis, of these, 25 had a positive correlation, and 37 had a negative correlation. Additionally, Alphaproteobacteria and Lachnospiraceae (0.95, 0.91–0.98, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01; 0.97, 0.94–0.99, <i>p</i> = 0.02, respectively) were shown a bidirected causally association with PCOS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our study provides evidence of the bidirectional causal association between gut microbiota and PCOS from a genetic perspective.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":6990,"journal":{"name":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","volume":"103 11","pages":"2232-2241"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aogs.14957","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aogs.14957","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Previous studies have established a link between gut microbiota and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), but little is known about their precise causal relationship. Therefore, this study aims to explore whether there are precise causal relationships between gut microbiota and PCOS.

Material and Methods

We performed a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. Datasets were from the largest published meta-analysis on gut microbiota composition and the FinnGen cohort of the IEU Open Genome-Wide Association Study Project database. Inverse variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger, constrained maximum likelihood-based Mendelian randomization, weighted median, weighted mode, and simple mode were used. Cochran's Q and MR-Egger intercept tests were employed to measure the heterogeneity.

Results

A total of 211 gut microbiota taxa were identified in MR analysis. Nine taxa of bacteria, including Alphaproteobacteria (0.55, 0.30–0.99, p = 0.04), Bacilli (1.76, 1.07–2.91, p = 0.03), Bilophila (0.42, 0.23–0.77, p < 0.01), Blautia (0.16, 0.03–0.79, p = 0.02), Burkholderiales (2.37, 1.22–4.62, p = 0.01), Candidatus Soleaferrea (0.65, 0.43–0.98, p = 0.04), Cyanobacteria (0.51, 0.31–0.83, p = 0.01), Holdemania (0.53, 0.35–0.81, p < 0.01), and Lachnospiraceae (1.86, 1.04–3.35, p = 0.03), were found to be associated with PCOS in the above MR methods included at least IVW method. Cochran's Q statistics and MR-Egger intercept test suggested no significant heterogeneity. In addition, 69 taxa were shown significant for at least the IVW method in reverse MR analysis, of these, 25 had a positive correlation, and 37 had a negative correlation. Additionally, Alphaproteobacteria and Lachnospiraceae (0.95, 0.91–0.98, p < 0.01; 0.97, 0.94–0.99, p = 0.02, respectively) were shown a bidirected causally association with PCOS.

Conclusions

Our study provides evidence of the bidirectional causal association between gut microbiota and PCOS from a genetic perspective.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肠道微生物群与多囊卵巢综合征之间的因果关系:双向孟德尔随机研究
导言以往的研究已经确定了肠道微生物群与多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)之间的联系,但对其确切的因果关系却知之甚少。因此,本研究旨在探讨肠道微生物群与多囊卵巢综合征之间是否存在精确的因果关系。数据集来自已发表的有关肠道微生物群组成的最大规模荟萃分析和 IEU 开放全基因组关联研究项目数据库的 FinnGen 队列。使用了反方差加权(IVW)、MR-Egger、基于最大似然法的受限孟德尔随机化、加权中位数、加权模式和简单模式。结果 MR 分析共鉴定出 211 个肠道微生物群分类群。其中有 9 个细菌类群,包括阿尔法蛋白菌(0.55,0.30-0.99,p = 0.04)、芽孢杆菌(1.76,1.07-2.91,p = 0.03)、嗜双链杆菌(0.42,0.23-0.77,p <0.01),Blautia(0.16,0.03-0.79,p = 0.02),Burkholderiales(2.37,1.22-4.62,p = 0.01),Candidatus Soleaferrea(0.65,0.43-0.98,p = 0.04)、蓝藻(0.51,0.31-0.83,p = 0.01)、Holdemania(0.53,0.35-0.81,p <0.01)和Lachnospiraceae(1.86,1.04-3.35,p = 0.03),在上述MR方法中发现至少包括IVW方法与PCOS相关。Cochran's Q 统计量和 MR-Egger 截距检验表明没有明显的异质性。此外,在反向 MR 分析中,69 个分类群至少在 IVW 方法中显示出显著性,其中 25 个具有正相关性,37 个具有负相关性。此外,Alphaproteobacteria 和 Lachnospiraceae(分别为 0.95,0.91-0.98,p <0.01;0.97,0.94-0.99,p = 0.02)与 PCOS 存在双向因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
180
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Published monthly, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica is an international journal dedicated to providing the very latest information on the results of both clinical, basic and translational research work related to all aspects of women’s health from around the globe. The journal regularly publishes commentaries, reviews, and original articles on a wide variety of topics including: gynecology, pregnancy, birth, female urology, gynecologic oncology, fertility and reproductive biology.
期刊最新文献
Hospital obstetric volume and maternal outcomes: Does hospital size matter? Prediction of uterine rupture in singleton pregnancies with one prior cesarean birth undergoing TOLAC: A cross-sectional study. Maternal asthma during pregnancy and the likelihood of neurodevelopmental disorders in offspring. May the indication for a previous cesarean section affect the outcome at trial of labor in women with induction of labor? A retrospective cohort study. The interplay of body mass index, gestational weight gain, and birthweight over 3800 g in vaginal breech birth: A retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1