Gauging the threat of invasive species to UNESCO world heritage sites relative to other anthropogenic threats

IF 2.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Biological Invasions Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1007/s10530-024-03424-0
Marc William Cadotte, Mohamed Alabbasi, Sara Akib, Pruthuvie Chandradhas, Joanne Gui, Kelly Huang, Adrian Li, David M. Richardson, Ross T. Shackleton
{"title":"Gauging the threat of invasive species to UNESCO world heritage sites relative to other anthropogenic threats","authors":"Marc William Cadotte, Mohamed Alabbasi, Sara Akib, Pruthuvie Chandradhas, Joanne Gui, Kelly Huang, Adrian Li, David M. Richardson, Ross T. Shackleton","doi":"10.1007/s10530-024-03424-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There are 230 UNESCO World Heritage Sites that were designated based on their important natural features. These represent some of the most iconic and important natural places on Earth, with immense value for biodiversity conservation, ecosystem service supply and cultural well-being. Many of these sites are degraded by anthropogenic drivers, including socioeconomic factors (population growth, poverty and tourism), extractive activities (logging, mining, and hunting), external threats (fire, climate change, land-use change, pollution), and biological threats (disease and invasive species). Of these, invasive species remain one of the most problematic for management, and once introduced, populations can grow exponentially and spread to other locations even when actively managed. Given the economic and environmental threats imposed by invasive species, we asked how they compare to the other anthropogenic threats. We reviewed the primary literature for each World Heritage Site and scored the prevalence of 12 different anthropogenic drivers. We found that invasive species rank as one of the most frequently identified threats and pose the greatest degree of concern compared to all other threats, on par with the threat from pollution and greater than logging, land-use change and climate change. We compared our scoring, based on review of the literature, with that of the UNESCO and IUCN monitoring reports. Although there was general agreement between these two assessments, the literature provided information on 55 sites not included in the monitoring reports. We further examine the invasive species examined in the articles and the degree of their perceived impacts on biodiversity, habitat, rare species, ecosystem function, tourism, and economic impacts. It is important that invasive species are well monitored and managed in WHSs to reduce their impacts and meet policy mandated targets and conservation goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":9202,"journal":{"name":"Biological Invasions","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Invasions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-024-03424-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are 230 UNESCO World Heritage Sites that were designated based on their important natural features. These represent some of the most iconic and important natural places on Earth, with immense value for biodiversity conservation, ecosystem service supply and cultural well-being. Many of these sites are degraded by anthropogenic drivers, including socioeconomic factors (population growth, poverty and tourism), extractive activities (logging, mining, and hunting), external threats (fire, climate change, land-use change, pollution), and biological threats (disease and invasive species). Of these, invasive species remain one of the most problematic for management, and once introduced, populations can grow exponentially and spread to other locations even when actively managed. Given the economic and environmental threats imposed by invasive species, we asked how they compare to the other anthropogenic threats. We reviewed the primary literature for each World Heritage Site and scored the prevalence of 12 different anthropogenic drivers. We found that invasive species rank as one of the most frequently identified threats and pose the greatest degree of concern compared to all other threats, on par with the threat from pollution and greater than logging, land-use change and climate change. We compared our scoring, based on review of the literature, with that of the UNESCO and IUCN monitoring reports. Although there was general agreement between these two assessments, the literature provided information on 55 sites not included in the monitoring reports. We further examine the invasive species examined in the articles and the degree of their perceived impacts on biodiversity, habitat, rare species, ecosystem function, tourism, and economic impacts. It is important that invasive species are well monitored and managed in WHSs to reduce their impacts and meet policy mandated targets and conservation goals.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
相对于其他人为威胁,评估入侵物种对教科文组织世界遗产地的威胁
联合国教科文组织根据重要的自然特征指定了 230 处世界遗产。这些遗产地代表了地球上最具标志性和最重要的自然景观,在生物多样性保护、生态系统服务供应和文化福祉方面具有巨大价值。这些遗产地中有许多因人为因素而退化,包括社会经济因素(人口增长、贫困和旅游业)、采掘活动(伐木、采矿和狩猎)、外部威胁(火灾、气候变化、土地使用变化、污染)以及生物威胁(疾病和入侵物种)。其中,入侵物种仍然是管理中最棘手的问题之一,一旦引入,即使积极管理,其种群也会成倍增长并扩散到其他地方。鉴于入侵物种带来的经济和环境威胁,我们想知道它们与其他人为威胁相比有何不同。我们查阅了每个世界遗产地的主要文献,并对 12 种不同人为因素的普遍性进行了评分。我们发现,入侵物种是最常见的威胁之一,与所有其他威胁相比,入侵物种造成的威胁最大,与污染威胁相当,大于伐木、土地使用变化和气候变化。我们在查阅文献的基础上,将我们的评分与联合国教科文组织和世界自然保护联盟的监测报告进行了比较。尽管这两项评估结果基本一致,但文献提供了 55 个监测报告中未包含的地点的信息。我们进一步研究了文章中研究的入侵物种及其对生物多样性、栖息地、珍稀物种、生态系统功能、旅游业和经济影响的认知程度。在世界遗产地对入侵物种进行良好的监测和管理,以减少其影响并实现政策规定的目标和保护目标,这一点非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Invasions
Biological Invasions 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
248
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Biological Invasions publishes research and synthesis papers on patterns and processes of biological invasions in terrestrial, freshwater, and marine (including brackish) ecosystems. Also of interest are scholarly papers on management and policy issues as they relate to conservation programs and the global amelioration or control of invasions. The journal will consider proposals for special issues resulting from conferences or workshops on invasions.There are no page charges to publish in this journal.
期刊最新文献
Plant invasion down under: exploring the below-ground impact of invasive plant species on soil properties and invertebrate communities in the Central Plateau of New Zealand Cats in a bag: state-based spending for invasive species management across the United States is haphazard, uncoordinated, and incomplete Range expansion of the invasive hybrid cattail Typha × glauca exceeds that of its maternal plant T. angustifolia in the western Prairie Pothole Region of North America Recruitment curves of three non-native conifers in European temperate forests: implications for invasions Combining storm flood water level and topography to prioritize inter-basin transfer of non-native aquatic species in the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1