Streamlined Clinical Management Pathways May Reduce Major Amputations in Patients with Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia: A Prospective Cohort Study with Historical Controls.

IF 5.7 1区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.09.005
John S M Houghton,Anna Meffen,Laura J Gray,Tanya J Payne,Victoria J Haunton,Robert S M Davies,Rob D Sayers,
{"title":"Streamlined Clinical Management Pathways May Reduce Major Amputations in Patients with Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia: A Prospective Cohort Study with Historical Controls.","authors":"John S M Houghton,Anna Meffen,Laura J Gray,Tanya J Payne,Victoria J Haunton,Robert S M Davies,Rob D Sayers,","doi":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nPatient characteristics and patterns of disease in chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI) have changed markedly in recent years. Urgent specialist referral and timely revascularisation are recommended in international guidelines. UK guidelines now recommend revascularisation within 5 days of referral for inpatients and 2 weeks in outpatients. This study compared the contemporary one year major amputation incidence in patients with CLTI with a historical cohort at a single UK centre.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis was a single centre, observational cohort study with historical controls. A prospective cohort was recruited between May 2019 and March 2022. A historical cohort presenting between 2013 and 2015 inclusive was identified retrospectively. Significant changes in management pathways, including establishing a rapid access limb salvage clinic, occurred between these periods aiming to expedite time from referral to revascularisation. The one year primary outcome was major amputation, and the secondary outcome was death. Major amputation was analysed by Fine-Gray competing risks models (death as the competing risk), presented as subdistribution hazard ratios (SHRs). One year mortality was analysed by Cox regression, presented as hazard ratios. Analyses were adjusted for propensity score.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA total of 928 patients were included (432 prospective and 496 historical). Proportions of patients presenting with tissue loss (72.2% vs. 71.6%; p = .090) were similar in both cohorts. At one year, 48 patients (11.1%) in the prospective cohort and 124 patients (25.0%) in the historical cohort had undergone a major amputation (p < .001). Risk of major amputation was 57.0% lower in the prospective cohort compared with the historical cohort after adjustment for propensity score (SHR 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.29 - 0.63; p < .001).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nAn encouraging reduction in major amputation incidence was observed after improvements to CLTI management pathways, but residual confounding is likely. The generalisability of these results is uncertain.","PeriodicalId":55160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.09.005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Patient characteristics and patterns of disease in chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI) have changed markedly in recent years. Urgent specialist referral and timely revascularisation are recommended in international guidelines. UK guidelines now recommend revascularisation within 5 days of referral for inpatients and 2 weeks in outpatients. This study compared the contemporary one year major amputation incidence in patients with CLTI with a historical cohort at a single UK centre. METHODS This was a single centre, observational cohort study with historical controls. A prospective cohort was recruited between May 2019 and March 2022. A historical cohort presenting between 2013 and 2015 inclusive was identified retrospectively. Significant changes in management pathways, including establishing a rapid access limb salvage clinic, occurred between these periods aiming to expedite time from referral to revascularisation. The one year primary outcome was major amputation, and the secondary outcome was death. Major amputation was analysed by Fine-Gray competing risks models (death as the competing risk), presented as subdistribution hazard ratios (SHRs). One year mortality was analysed by Cox regression, presented as hazard ratios. Analyses were adjusted for propensity score. RESULTS A total of 928 patients were included (432 prospective and 496 historical). Proportions of patients presenting with tissue loss (72.2% vs. 71.6%; p = .090) were similar in both cohorts. At one year, 48 patients (11.1%) in the prospective cohort and 124 patients (25.0%) in the historical cohort had undergone a major amputation (p < .001). Risk of major amputation was 57.0% lower in the prospective cohort compared with the historical cohort after adjustment for propensity score (SHR 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.29 - 0.63; p < .001). CONCLUSION An encouraging reduction in major amputation incidence was observed after improvements to CLTI management pathways, but residual confounding is likely. The generalisability of these results is uncertain.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
简化临床管理路径可减少慢性肢体缺血患者的主要截肢:带历史对照的前瞻性队列研究。
目的近年来,慢性肢体缺血(CLTI)患者的特征和疾病模式发生了显著变化。国际指南建议紧急专科转诊并及时进行血管重建。目前,英国指南建议住院病人在转诊后 5 天内、门诊病人在 2 周内进行血管再通手术。本研究比较了当代CLTI患者一年内的主要截肢发生率和英国一个中心的历史队列。在2019年5月至2022年3月期间招募了一个前瞻性队列。回顾性地确定了 2013 年至 2015 年(含)期间发病的历史队列。在此期间,管理路径发生了重大变化,包括建立了快速肢体救治门诊,旨在加快从转诊到血管重建的时间。一年的主要结果是大截肢,次要结果是死亡。重大截肢采用 Fine-Gray 竞争风险模型进行分析(死亡为竞争风险),以次分布危险比 (SHR) 表示。一年死亡率采用 Cox 回归分析,以危险比表示。结果共纳入 928 名患者(432 名前瞻性患者和 496 名历史性患者)。两组患者出现组织缺失的比例(72.2% vs. 71.6%;p = .090)相似。一年后,前瞻性队列中有 48 名患者(11.1%)进行了大截肢,历史性队列中有 124 名患者(25.0%)进行了大截肢(p < .001)。在对倾向评分进行调整后,前瞻性队列与历史队列相比,大截肢风险降低了 57.0%(SHR 0.43,95% 置信区间 0.29 - 0.63;p < .001)。这些结果的普遍性尚不确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
471
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery is aimed primarily at vascular surgeons dealing with patients with arterial, venous and lymphatic diseases. Contributions are included on the diagnosis, investigation and management of these vascular disorders. Papers that consider the technical aspects of vascular surgery are encouraged, and the journal includes invited state-of-the-art articles. Reflecting the increasing importance of endovascular techniques in the management of vascular diseases and the value of closer collaboration between the vascular surgeon and the vascular radiologist, the journal has now extended its scope to encompass the growing number of contributions from this exciting field. Articles describing endovascular method and their critical evaluation are included, as well as reports on the emerging technology associated with this field.
期刊最新文献
Outcomes after Endovascular Arch Repair in Patients with a Mechanical Aortic Valve: Results from a Multicentre Study. A Misdiagnosed Intravenous Leiomyomatosis. Anatomical Suitability of Iliac Branch Devices for East Asian Patients With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. 3D Aortic Dissection Luminal Navigation: A Radiation Free Alternative or Complement to Intravascular Ultrasound? Intervention for Intermittent Claudication: "Primum Non Nocere".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1