Preferences for coordinated care for rare diseases: discrete choice experiment

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1186/s13023-024-03353-0
Stephen Morris, Holly Walton, Amy Simpson, Kerry Leeson-Beevers, Lara Bloom, Amy Hunter, Angus I. G. Ramsay, Naomi J. Fulop, Lyn S. Chitty, Joe Kai, Alastair G. Sutcliffe, Maria Kokocinska, Larissa Kerecuk, Christine A. Taylor, Pei Li Ng
{"title":"Preferences for coordinated care for rare diseases: discrete choice experiment","authors":"Stephen Morris, Holly Walton, Amy Simpson, Kerry Leeson-Beevers, Lara Bloom, Amy Hunter, Angus I. G. Ramsay, Naomi J. Fulop, Lyn S. Chitty, Joe Kai, Alastair G. Sutcliffe, Maria Kokocinska, Larissa Kerecuk, Christine A. Taylor, Pei Li Ng","doi":"10.1186/s13023-024-03353-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evidence suggests that coordination of care for people affected by rare diseases is poor. In order to improve the way that care is coordinated it is necessary to understand the preferences of people affected by these conditions, and providers. The aim of this study was to examine patient, parent and carer, and health care professional preferences for different attributes of care coordination for people affected by rare diseases. We conducted a discrete choice experiment using online surveys. There were no restrictions on participants in terms of rare conditions, demographic factors other than age, or geographical location within the UK. Choice scenarios were based on the following attributes: annual cost of attending appointments; access to health records; access to clinical expertise; support of a care coordinator; access to a specialist centre; and, the existence of a documented plan for emergency care. Data were analysed using alternative-specific conditional logit regression models. Valid responses were obtained from 996 individuals (528 patients, 280 carers, 188 health care professionals) between August and December 2019. All attributes significantly influenced the type of service respondents preferred. Patients, carers and health professionals’ preferences for care coordination were influenced by: the cost of attending appointments; access to health records; clinical expertise; role of care coordinators; access to specialist centres; and the existence of plan for emergency care. There were no statistically significant differences in the preferences between patients and carers. Preferences of health professionals differed to those of patients and carers. Both patients and carers selected responses which granted them a greater degree of autonomy in relation to the role of care coordinators, whereas health professionals preferred services where care coordinators had more autonomy. Health care professionals also expressed a stronger preference for a documented formal emergency plan to be in place. The findings highlight that people value better coordinated care, in line with policy documents emphasising commitments to coordinated care for people affected by rare diseases. This study highlights the factors that could be included in service provision as ways of improving the coordination of care for people affected by rare diseases.","PeriodicalId":19651,"journal":{"name":"Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-024-03353-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evidence suggests that coordination of care for people affected by rare diseases is poor. In order to improve the way that care is coordinated it is necessary to understand the preferences of people affected by these conditions, and providers. The aim of this study was to examine patient, parent and carer, and health care professional preferences for different attributes of care coordination for people affected by rare diseases. We conducted a discrete choice experiment using online surveys. There were no restrictions on participants in terms of rare conditions, demographic factors other than age, or geographical location within the UK. Choice scenarios were based on the following attributes: annual cost of attending appointments; access to health records; access to clinical expertise; support of a care coordinator; access to a specialist centre; and, the existence of a documented plan for emergency care. Data were analysed using alternative-specific conditional logit regression models. Valid responses were obtained from 996 individuals (528 patients, 280 carers, 188 health care professionals) between August and December 2019. All attributes significantly influenced the type of service respondents preferred. Patients, carers and health professionals’ preferences for care coordination were influenced by: the cost of attending appointments; access to health records; clinical expertise; role of care coordinators; access to specialist centres; and the existence of plan for emergency care. There were no statistically significant differences in the preferences between patients and carers. Preferences of health professionals differed to those of patients and carers. Both patients and carers selected responses which granted them a greater degree of autonomy in relation to the role of care coordinators, whereas health professionals preferred services where care coordinators had more autonomy. Health care professionals also expressed a stronger preference for a documented formal emergency plan to be in place. The findings highlight that people value better coordinated care, in line with policy documents emphasising commitments to coordinated care for people affected by rare diseases. This study highlights the factors that could be included in service provision as ways of improving the coordination of care for people affected by rare diseases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对罕见病协调护理的偏好:离散选择实验
有证据表明,对罕见病患者的护理协调性很差。为了改善护理协调方式,有必要了解罕见病患者和医疗服务提供者的偏好。本研究旨在考察患者、家长和照护者以及医护人员对罕见病患者护理协调的不同属性的偏好。我们利用在线调查进行了离散选择实验。参与者不受罕见病、除年龄以外的人口统计因素或英国境内地理位置的限制。选择方案基于以下属性:每年的就诊费用;健康记录的获取;临床专业知识的获取;护理协调员的支持;专科中心的获取;以及是否有记录在案的紧急护理计划。数据分析采用了其他特定条件对数回归模型。在 2019 年 8 月至 12 月期间,996 人(528 名患者、280 名护理人员、188 名医疗保健专业人员)做出了有效回答。所有属性都对受访者偏好的服务类型产生了重大影响。患者、护理者和医疗专业人员对护理协调的偏好受到以下因素的影响:就诊费用、健康记录的获取、临床专业知识、护理协调者的角色、专科中心的获取以及是否存在紧急护理计划。在统计上,患者和护理者的偏好没有明显差异。医疗专业人员的偏好与患者和照护者的偏好有所不同。病人和照护者都选择了在护理协调员的角色方面给予他们更大自主权的答案,而医护专业人员则更倾向于护理协调员拥有更大自主权的服务。医护专业人员也表示更倾向于制定有文件记录的正式应急计划。研究结果突出表明,人们重视更好的协调护理,这与强调为罕见病患者提供协调护理的政策文件是一致的。本研究强调了可纳入服务提供的因素,以此作为改善罕见病患者护理协调的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.10%
发文量
418
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that encompasses all aspects of rare diseases and orphan drugs. The journal publishes high-quality reviews on specific rare diseases. In addition, the journal may consider articles on clinical trial outcome reports, either positive or negative, and articles on public health issues in the field of rare diseases and orphan drugs. The journal does not accept case reports.
期刊最新文献
International expert opinion on the considerations for combining vosoritide and limb surgery: a modified delphi study Do we care? Reporting of genetic diagnoses in multidisciplinary intellectual disability care: a retrospective chart review Real-world multidisciplinary outcomes of onasemnogene abeparvovec monotherapy in patients with spinal muscular atrophy type 1: experience of the French cohort in the first three years of treatment CFTR modulators response of S737F and T465N CFTR variants on patient-derived rectal organoids Genomic and phenotypic landscapes of X-linked hereditary hearing loss in the Chinese population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1