{"title":"Physical limits on chemical sensing in bounded domains","authors":"Daniel R. McCusker, David K. Lubensky","doi":"arxiv-2408.10745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cells respond to chemical cues, and the precision with which they can sense\nthese cues is fundamentally limited by the stochastic nature of diffusion and\nligand binding. Berg and Purcell famously investigated how well a small sensor\nin an infinite ligand bath can determine the ligand concentration, and a number\nof subsequent analyses have refined and built upon their classical estimates.\nNot all concentration sensing problems, however, occur in such an infinite\ngeometry. At different scales, subcellular sensors and cells in tissues are\nboth often confronted with signals whose diffusion is affected by confining\nboundaries. It is thus valuable to understand how basic limits on\nchemosensation depend on the sensor's size and on its position in the domain in\nwhich ligand diffuses. Here we compute how sensor size and proximity to\nreflecting boundaries affect the diffusion-limited precision of chemosensation\nfor various geometries in one and three dimensions. We derive analytical\nexpressions for the sensing limit in these geometries. Among our conclusions is\nthe surprising result that, in certain circumstances, smaller sensors can be\nmore effective than larger sensors. This effect arises from a trade-off between\nspatial averaging and time averaging that we analyze in detail. We also find\nthat proximity to confining boundaries can degrade a sensor's precision\nsignificantly compared to the precision of the same sensor far from any\nboundaries.","PeriodicalId":501040,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Biological Physics","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Biological Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.10745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cells respond to chemical cues, and the precision with which they can sense
these cues is fundamentally limited by the stochastic nature of diffusion and
ligand binding. Berg and Purcell famously investigated how well a small sensor
in an infinite ligand bath can determine the ligand concentration, and a number
of subsequent analyses have refined and built upon their classical estimates.
Not all concentration sensing problems, however, occur in such an infinite
geometry. At different scales, subcellular sensors and cells in tissues are
both often confronted with signals whose diffusion is affected by confining
boundaries. It is thus valuable to understand how basic limits on
chemosensation depend on the sensor's size and on its position in the domain in
which ligand diffuses. Here we compute how sensor size and proximity to
reflecting boundaries affect the diffusion-limited precision of chemosensation
for various geometries in one and three dimensions. We derive analytical
expressions for the sensing limit in these geometries. Among our conclusions is
the surprising result that, in certain circumstances, smaller sensors can be
more effective than larger sensors. This effect arises from a trade-off between
spatial averaging and time averaging that we analyze in detail. We also find
that proximity to confining boundaries can degrade a sensor's precision
significantly compared to the precision of the same sensor far from any
boundaries.