Co-infection dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 and respiratory viruses in the 2022/2023 respiratory season in the Netherlands

Gesa Carstens, Eva Kozanli, Kirsten Bulsink, Scott McDonald, Mansoer Elahi, Jordy de Bakker, Maarten Schipper, Rianne van Gageldonk-Lafeber, Susan van den Hof, Albert Jan van Hoek, Dirk Eggink
{"title":"Co-infection dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 and respiratory viruses in the 2022/2023 respiratory season in the Netherlands","authors":"Gesa Carstens, Eva Kozanli, Kirsten Bulsink, Scott McDonald, Mansoer Elahi, Jordy de Bakker, Maarten Schipper, Rianne van Gageldonk-Lafeber, Susan van den Hof, Albert Jan van Hoek, Dirk Eggink","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.10.24313400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Evaluation of the presence and effect of SARS-CoV-2 co-infections on disease severity. Methods: We collected both symptom data and nose- and throat samples from symptomatic people during the 2022/2023 respiratory season in a large participatory surveillance study in the Netherlands, and tested these for 18 respiratory viruses including SARS-CoV-2. We compared reported health status, symptoms and odds of having a mono respiratory viral infection or co-infection with SARS-CoV-2 and another respiratory virus. Results: In total 4,655 samples were included with 22% (n=1,017) testing SARS-CoV-2 positive. Of these 11% (n=116) also tested positive for a second respiratory virus. The most frequently occurring co-infections in SARS-CoV-2 positive participants were with rhinovirus (59%; n=69), seasonal coronaviruses (15%; n=17) and adenovirus (7%; n=8). Participants with a co-infection with one of these three viruses did not report more severe disease compared to those with a SARS-CoV-2 mono-infection. The odds of experiencing SARS-CoV-2 co-infection with seasonal coronavirus or rhinovirus were lower compared to the odds of the respective non-SARS-CoV-2 mono-infection (OR: 0.16, CI 95%: 0.10 - 0.24; OR: 0.21 CI 95%: 0.17 - 0.26; respectively). Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 co-infections with rhinovirus, seasonal coronavirus and adenovirus are frequently observed in the general population, but are not associated with more severe disease compared to SARS-CoV-2 mono-infections. Furthermore, we found indications for inter-virus interaction with rhinovirus and seasonal coronavirus, possibly decreasing risk of co-infection.","PeriodicalId":501071,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Epidemiology","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.10.24313400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Evaluation of the presence and effect of SARS-CoV-2 co-infections on disease severity. Methods: We collected both symptom data and nose- and throat samples from symptomatic people during the 2022/2023 respiratory season in a large participatory surveillance study in the Netherlands, and tested these for 18 respiratory viruses including SARS-CoV-2. We compared reported health status, symptoms and odds of having a mono respiratory viral infection or co-infection with SARS-CoV-2 and another respiratory virus. Results: In total 4,655 samples were included with 22% (n=1,017) testing SARS-CoV-2 positive. Of these 11% (n=116) also tested positive for a second respiratory virus. The most frequently occurring co-infections in SARS-CoV-2 positive participants were with rhinovirus (59%; n=69), seasonal coronaviruses (15%; n=17) and adenovirus (7%; n=8). Participants with a co-infection with one of these three viruses did not report more severe disease compared to those with a SARS-CoV-2 mono-infection. The odds of experiencing SARS-CoV-2 co-infection with seasonal coronavirus or rhinovirus were lower compared to the odds of the respective non-SARS-CoV-2 mono-infection (OR: 0.16, CI 95%: 0.10 - 0.24; OR: 0.21 CI 95%: 0.17 - 0.26; respectively). Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 co-infections with rhinovirus, seasonal coronavirus and adenovirus are frequently observed in the general population, but are not associated with more severe disease compared to SARS-CoV-2 mono-infections. Furthermore, we found indications for inter-virus interaction with rhinovirus and seasonal coronavirus, possibly decreasing risk of co-infection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
荷兰 2022/2023 年呼吸季节 SARS-CoV-2 和呼吸道病毒的合并感染动态
目标评估 SARS-CoV-2 合并感染的存在及其对疾病严重程度的影响。方法我们在荷兰的一项大型参与性监测研究中收集了 2022/2023 年呼吸季节期间有症状者的症状数据和鼻咽样本,并对这些数据和样本进行了包括 SARS-CoV-2 在内的 18 种呼吸道病毒检测。我们比较了报告的健康状况、症状以及感染单一呼吸道病毒或同时感染 SARS-CoV-2 和其他呼吸道病毒的几率。结果共纳入 4,655 份样本,22%(n=1,017)的样本经 SARS-CoV-2 检测呈阳性。其中 11%(n=116)的样本对第二种呼吸道病毒检测也呈阳性。在 SARS-CoV-2 阳性的参与者中,最常见的合并感染是鼻病毒(59%;n=69)、季节性冠状病毒(15%;n=17)和腺病毒(7%;n=8)。与单一感染 SARS-CoV-2 的参与者相比,合并感染这三种病毒之一的参与者并没有报告更严重的疾病。SARS-CoV-2与季节性冠状病毒或鼻病毒合并感染的几率低于非SARS-CoV-2单一感染的几率(OR:0.16,CI 95%:0.10 - 0.24;OR:0.21,CI 95%:0.17 - 0.26;分别为0.16和0.21)。结论SARS-CoV-2与鼻病毒、季节性冠状病毒和腺病毒合并感染在普通人群中很常见,但与SARS-CoV-2单一感染相比,与更严重的疾病无关。此外,我们还发现鼻病毒和季节性冠状病毒之间存在病毒间相互作用的迹象,这可能会降低合并感染的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Climate Change and Malaria: A Call for Robust Analytics Female Infertility and Neurodevelopmental Disorders in Children: associations and evidence for familial confounding in Denmark Surveillance and control of neglected zoonotic diseases: methodological approaches to studying Rift Valley Fever, Crimean-Congo Haemorrhagic Fever and Brucellosis at the human-livestock-wildlife interface across diverse agricultural systems in Uganda Climate variation and serotype competition drive dengue outbreak dynamics in Singapore Leveraging an Online Dashboard to Inform on Infectious Disease Surveillance: A case Study of COVID-19 in Kenya.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1