Protection of vaccine boosters and prior infection against mild/asymptomatic and moderate COVID-19 infection in the UK SIREN healthcare worker cohort: October 2023 to March 2024

Peter D Kirwan, Sarah D Foulkes, Katie Munro, Dominic Sparkes, Jasleen Singh, Amanda Henry, Angela Dunne, Jean Timeyin, Sophie Russell, Jameel Khawam, Debbie Blick, Ashley D Otter, Nipunadi Hettiarachchi, Michelle Cairns, Christopher H Jackson, Shaun Seaman, Colin S Brown, SIREN Study Group, Ana Atti, Jasmin Islam, Andre Charlett, Daniela De Angelis, Anne M Presanis, Victoria Jane Hall, Susan Hopkins
{"title":"Protection of vaccine boosters and prior infection against mild/asymptomatic and moderate COVID-19 infection in the UK SIREN healthcare worker cohort: October 2023 to March 2024","authors":"Peter D Kirwan, Sarah D Foulkes, Katie Munro, Dominic Sparkes, Jasleen Singh, Amanda Henry, Angela Dunne, Jean Timeyin, Sophie Russell, Jameel Khawam, Debbie Blick, Ashley D Otter, Nipunadi Hettiarachchi, Michelle Cairns, Christopher H Jackson, Shaun Seaman, Colin S Brown, SIREN Study Group, Ana Atti, Jasmin Islam, Andre Charlett, Daniela De Angelis, Anne M Presanis, Victoria Jane Hall, Susan Hopkins","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.11.24313477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Objective</strong> To estimate the protection of COVID-19 vaccine boosters against mild/asymptomatic and moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection over a 6-month period of XBB.1.5 and JN.1 variant circulation.\n<strong>Design</strong> Multi-state model applied to cohort study, adjusted for vaccination, prior infection, and demographic covariates.\n<strong>Setting</strong> National Health Services (NHS) hospitals in the UK.\n<strong>Participants</strong> Healthcare worker cohort including 2,867 eligible people with &gt;6 months since a previous booster who tested fortnightly for SARS-CoV-2 between October 2023 and March 2024 and completed symptoms questionnaires. <strong>Main outcome measures</strong> Vaccine effectiveness (VE) of vaccine boosters received in October 2023 (baseline: booster &gt;6 months prior), and durability of protection from a recent (past 6 months) previous infection (baseline: last infection &gt;2 years prior) against mild/asymptomatic and moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection. Mild symptoms included acute respiratory symptoms for &lt;5 days, moderate symptoms included influenza-like illness, acute respiratory symptoms for 5+ days, or sick-leave. VE and acquired protection were estimated from the multi-state model as: 1 - adjusted hazard ratio.\n<strong>Interventions</strong> Receipt of a COVID-19 bivalent original/BA.4-5 or monovalent XBB.1.5 booster during October 2023.\n<strong>Results</strong> Half of eligible participants (1,422) received a booster during October 2023 (280 bivalent, 1,142 monovalent) and 536 (19%) had at least one PCR-confirmed infection over the study period. For the monovalent booster, VE against infection was 44.2% (95% confidence interval 21.7 to 60.3%) at 0-2 months, and 24.1% (-0.7 to 42.9%) at 2-4 months post-vaccination, with no evidence of protection by 4-6 months. For the bivalent booster, VE against infection was 15.1% (-55.4 to 53.6%) at 0-2 months and 4.2% (-46.4 to 37.3%) at 2-4 months. VE (monovalent or bivalent) against moderate infection was 39.7% (19.9 to 54.6%), and against mild/asymptomatic infection was 14.0% (-12.1 to 34.0%). Controlling for vaccination, compared to those with an infection &gt;2 years prior, infection within the past 6 months was associated with 58.6% (30.3 to 75.4%) increased protection against moderate infection, and 38.5% (5.8 to 59.8%) increased protection against mild/asymptomatic infection.\n<strong>Conclusions</strong> Monovalent XBB.1.5 boosters provided short-term protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection, particularly against moderate symptoms. Vaccine formulations which target the circulating variant may be suitable for inclusion in seasonal vaccination campaigns among healthcare workers.","PeriodicalId":501071,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.11.24313477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To estimate the protection of COVID-19 vaccine boosters against mild/asymptomatic and moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection over a 6-month period of XBB.1.5 and JN.1 variant circulation. Design Multi-state model applied to cohort study, adjusted for vaccination, prior infection, and demographic covariates. Setting National Health Services (NHS) hospitals in the UK. Participants Healthcare worker cohort including 2,867 eligible people with >6 months since a previous booster who tested fortnightly for SARS-CoV-2 between October 2023 and March 2024 and completed symptoms questionnaires. Main outcome measures Vaccine effectiveness (VE) of vaccine boosters received in October 2023 (baseline: booster >6 months prior), and durability of protection from a recent (past 6 months) previous infection (baseline: last infection >2 years prior) against mild/asymptomatic and moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection. Mild symptoms included acute respiratory symptoms for <5 days, moderate symptoms included influenza-like illness, acute respiratory symptoms for 5+ days, or sick-leave. VE and acquired protection were estimated from the multi-state model as: 1 - adjusted hazard ratio. Interventions Receipt of a COVID-19 bivalent original/BA.4-5 or monovalent XBB.1.5 booster during October 2023. Results Half of eligible participants (1,422) received a booster during October 2023 (280 bivalent, 1,142 monovalent) and 536 (19%) had at least one PCR-confirmed infection over the study period. For the monovalent booster, VE against infection was 44.2% (95% confidence interval 21.7 to 60.3%) at 0-2 months, and 24.1% (-0.7 to 42.9%) at 2-4 months post-vaccination, with no evidence of protection by 4-6 months. For the bivalent booster, VE against infection was 15.1% (-55.4 to 53.6%) at 0-2 months and 4.2% (-46.4 to 37.3%) at 2-4 months. VE (monovalent or bivalent) against moderate infection was 39.7% (19.9 to 54.6%), and against mild/asymptomatic infection was 14.0% (-12.1 to 34.0%). Controlling for vaccination, compared to those with an infection >2 years prior, infection within the past 6 months was associated with 58.6% (30.3 to 75.4%) increased protection against moderate infection, and 38.5% (5.8 to 59.8%) increased protection against mild/asymptomatic infection. Conclusions Monovalent XBB.1.5 boosters provided short-term protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection, particularly against moderate symptoms. Vaccine formulations which target the circulating variant may be suitable for inclusion in seasonal vaccination campaigns among healthcare workers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国 SIREN 医护人员队列中轻度/无症状和中度 COVID-19 感染的疫苗强化剂和既往感染保护:2023 年 10 月至 2024 年 3 月
目的 估计 COVID-19 疫苗强化剂对轻度/无症状和中度 SARS-CoV-2 感染的保护作用,时间跨度为 XBB.1.5 和 JN.1 变体循环的 6 个月。设计 多状态模型应用于队列研究,根据疫苗接种、既往感染情况和人口统计学协变量进行调整。参与者 医护人员队列,包括2867名符合条件的人员,他们在2023年10月至2024年3月期间每两周接受一次SARS-CoV-2检测,并填写症状问卷。主要结果指标 2023 年 10 月(基线:6 个月前接种过加强剂)接种疫苗的有效性(VE),以及近期(过去 6 个月)感染(基线:2 年前最后一次感染)SARS-CoV-2 轻度/无症状和中度感染的保护持久性。轻度症状包括持续 5 天的急性呼吸道症状,中度症状包括流感样疾病、持续 5 天以上的急性呼吸道症状或病假。根据多状态模型估算的 VE 和获得性保护为干预措施 2023年10月期间接受COVID-19二价原始/BA.4-5或单价XBB.1.5强化剂。结果 符合条件的参与者中有一半(1422人)在2023年10月期间接受了强化剂(280人接受了二价强化剂,1142人接受了单价强化剂),536人(19%)在研究期间至少有一次PCR确诊感染。就单价加强剂而言,接种后 0-2 个月的抗感染 VE 为 44.2%(95% 置信区间为 21.7% 至 60.3%),接种后 2-4 个月的 VE 为 24.1%(-0.7% 至 42.9%),4-6 个月的 VE 没有保护证据。接种二价加强剂后,0-2 个月时的感染保护率为 15.1%(-55.4% 至 53.6%),2-4 个月时为 4.2%(-46.4% 至 37.3%)。预防中度感染的VE(单价或二价)为39.7%(19.9%至54.6%),预防轻度/无症状感染的VE为14.0%(-12.1%至34.0%)。结论 单价 XBB.1.5 增强剂可在短期内预防 SARS-CoV-2 感染,尤其是预防中度症状。针对流行变异株的疫苗制剂可能适合用于医护人员的季节性疫苗接种活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Climate Change and Malaria: A Call for Robust Analytics Female Infertility and Neurodevelopmental Disorders in Children: associations and evidence for familial confounding in Denmark Surveillance and control of neglected zoonotic diseases: methodological approaches to studying Rift Valley Fever, Crimean-Congo Haemorrhagic Fever and Brucellosis at the human-livestock-wildlife interface across diverse agricultural systems in Uganda Climate variation and serotype competition drive dengue outbreak dynamics in Singapore Leveraging an Online Dashboard to Inform on Infectious Disease Surveillance: A case Study of COVID-19 in Kenya.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1