Reducing Population-level Inequality Can Improve Demographic Group Fairness: a Twitter Case Study

Avijit Ghosh, Tomo Lazovich, Kristian Lum, Christo Wilson
{"title":"Reducing Population-level Inequality Can Improve Demographic Group Fairness: a Twitter Case Study","authors":"Avijit Ghosh, Tomo Lazovich, Kristian Lum, Christo Wilson","doi":"arxiv-2409.08135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many existing fairness metrics measure group-wise demographic disparities in\nsystem behavior or model performance. Calculating these metrics requires access\nto demographic information, which, in industrial settings, is often\nunavailable. By contrast, economic inequality metrics, such as the Gini\ncoefficient, require no demographic data to measure. However, reductions in\neconomic inequality do not necessarily correspond to reductions in demographic\ndisparities. In this paper, we empirically explore the relationship between\ndemographic-free inequality metrics -- such as the Gini coefficient -- and\nstandard demographic bias metrics that measure group-wise model performance\ndisparities specifically in the case of engagement inequality on Twitter. We\nanalyze tweets from 174K users over the duration of 2021 and find that\ndemographic-free impression inequality metrics are positively correlated with\ngender, race, and age disparities in the average case, and weakly (but still\npositively) correlated with demographic bias in the worst case. We therefore\nrecommend inequality metrics as a potentially useful proxy measure of average\ngroup-wise disparities, especially in cases where such disparities cannot be\nmeasured directly. Based on these results, we believe they can be used as part\nof broader efforts to improve fairness between demographic groups in scenarios\nlike content recommendation on social media.","PeriodicalId":501032,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Social and Information Networks","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Social and Information Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many existing fairness metrics measure group-wise demographic disparities in system behavior or model performance. Calculating these metrics requires access to demographic information, which, in industrial settings, is often unavailable. By contrast, economic inequality metrics, such as the Gini coefficient, require no demographic data to measure. However, reductions in economic inequality do not necessarily correspond to reductions in demographic disparities. In this paper, we empirically explore the relationship between demographic-free inequality metrics -- such as the Gini coefficient -- and standard demographic bias metrics that measure group-wise model performance disparities specifically in the case of engagement inequality on Twitter. We analyze tweets from 174K users over the duration of 2021 and find that demographic-free impression inequality metrics are positively correlated with gender, race, and age disparities in the average case, and weakly (but still positively) correlated with demographic bias in the worst case. We therefore recommend inequality metrics as a potentially useful proxy measure of average group-wise disparities, especially in cases where such disparities cannot be measured directly. Based on these results, we believe they can be used as part of broader efforts to improve fairness between demographic groups in scenarios like content recommendation on social media.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少人口层面的不平等可以改善人口群体的公平性:推特案例研究
许多现有的公平性度量标准衡量的是系统行为或模型性能方面的群体人口差异。计算这些指标需要获取人口信息,而在工业环境中,人口信息往往是不可用的。相比之下,经济不平等指标(如吉尼系数)则不需要人口数据来衡量。然而,经济不平等的减少并不一定与人口差异的减少相对应。在本文中,我们以推特上的参与度不平等为例,实证探讨了无人口统计不平等指标(如基尼系数)与标准人口统计偏差指标之间的关系。我们分析了 2021 年期间 17.4 万用户的推文,发现在一般情况下,无人口统计的印象不平等度量与性别、种族和年龄差距呈正相关,而在最坏情况下,与人口统计偏见呈弱相关(但仍呈正相关)。因此,我们建议将不平等度量作为衡量平均群体差异的潜在有用替代指标,尤其是在无法直接衡量此类差异的情况下。基于这些结果,我们认为不平等度量可以作为更广泛努力的一部分,以改善社交媒体内容推荐等场景中人口群体之间的公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
My Views Do Not Reflect Those of My Employer: Differences in Behavior of Organizations' Official and Personal Social Media Accounts A novel DFS/BFS approach towards link prediction Community Shaping in the Digital Age: A Temporal Fusion Framework for Analyzing Discourse Fragmentation in Online Social Networks Skill matching at scale: freelancer-project alignment for efficient multilingual candidate retrieval "It Might be Technically Impressive, But It's Practically Useless to Us": Practices, Challenges, and Opportunities for Cross-Functional Collaboration around AI within the News Industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1