{"title":"Fabrication of superhydrophilic membranes for oil-water separation: A life cycle assessment study","authors":"Junjie, Shen, Dixit V, Bhalani, Qian, Zhang, Yi, Yang, Suresh Kumar, Jewrajka","doi":"10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-c9w7l","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Membrane-based technologies are widely used in oily wastewater treatment. This study selects two superhydrophilic ultrafiltration (UF) membranes (denoted M1 and M2) for oil-in-water emulsion separation and evaluates the environmental impact of membrane fabrication using life cycle assessment (LCA). Although the two membranes have similar separation performance, M1 exhibits ~40% lower environmental impacts than M2 in almost every category owing to its fewer modification steps, lower electricity use, and less solvent consumption. Electricity consumption, reactive-copolymer synthesis, and toxic-solvent use are identified as environmental hotspots in membrane fabrication. A sensitivity analysis of different energy sources reveals that coal-based electricity has the greatest environmental impact, while photovoltaic energy reduces the impact by up to 71%. Considering solvents, dimethylformamide (DMF) shows a slightly lower environmental impact than N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP).","PeriodicalId":9813,"journal":{"name":"ChemRxiv","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ChemRxiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-c9w7l","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Membrane-based technologies are widely used in oily wastewater treatment. This study selects two superhydrophilic ultrafiltration (UF) membranes (denoted M1 and M2) for oil-in-water emulsion separation and evaluates the environmental impact of membrane fabrication using life cycle assessment (LCA). Although the two membranes have similar separation performance, M1 exhibits ~40% lower environmental impacts than M2 in almost every category owing to its fewer modification steps, lower electricity use, and less solvent consumption. Electricity consumption, reactive-copolymer synthesis, and toxic-solvent use are identified as environmental hotspots in membrane fabrication. A sensitivity analysis of different energy sources reveals that coal-based electricity has the greatest environmental impact, while photovoltaic energy reduces the impact by up to 71%. Considering solvents, dimethylformamide (DMF) shows a slightly lower environmental impact than N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP).