Waitlist and transplant outcomes in patients with metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease and autoimmune hepatitis

Abstract

Background and AimsMetabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), in the context of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) among liver transplantation (LT) candidates or recipients remains poorly understood. This study compares waitlist and post‐LT outcomes in patients with MASLD/AIH to MASLD and AIH alone.MethodsUsing the united network organ sharing database (2002–2022), we compared waitlist outcomes and post‐LT survival among patients with MASLD/AIH (n = 282), AIH (n = 5812), and MASLD (n = 33 331). Competing risk, Kaplan Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed.ResultsMASLD/AIH group had the highest rates of encephalopathy and ascites, and highest MELD scores. MASLD/AIH patients had higher transplantation incidence (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [aSHR] 1.64, 95% CI 1.44–1.85; p < .001) and lower waitlist removal risk (aSHR .30, 95% CI .20–.44; p < .001) compared to MASLD alone. One‐year post‐LT survival favoured MASLD compared to AIH (patient: 92% vs. 91%, p < .001; graft: 89% vs. 88%, p < .001) and MASLD/AIH (patient: 92% vs. 90%, p = .008; graft: 89% vs. 88%, p = .023). Recipients with MASLD/AIH showed no significant difference in survival at 10‐year post‐LT compared to MASLD (patient: 63% vs. 61%, p = .68; graft 60% vs. 59%, p = .83) and AIH (patient: 63% vs. 70%, p = .07; graft: 60% vs. 64%, p = .42).ConclusionsOur study showed that MASLD/AIH patients demonstrate higher LT incidence and lower dropout rates. Long‐term post‐LT outcomes did not significantly differ between groups. Further prospective multicenter studies are needed to validate these findings.