{"title":"An Earth-System-Oriented View of the S2S Predictability of North American Weather Regimes","authors":"Jhayron S. Pérez-Carrasquilla, Maria J. Molina","doi":"arxiv-2409.08174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is largely understood that subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) predictability\narises from the atmospheric initial state during early lead times, the land\nduring intermediate lead times, and the ocean during later lead times. We\nexamine whether this hypothesis holds for the S2S prediction of weather regimes\nby training a set of XGBoost models to predict weekly weather regimes over\nNorth America at 1-to-8-week lead times. Each model used a different predictor\nfrom one of the three considered Earth system components (atmosphere, ocean, or\nland) sourced from reanalyses. Three additional models were trained using\nland-, ocean-, or atmosphere-only predictors to capture process interactions\nand leverage multiple signals within the respective Earth system component. We\nfound that each Earth system component performed more skillfully at different\nforecast horizons, with sensitivity to seasonality and observed (i.e., ground\ntruth) weather regime. S2S predictability from the atmosphere was higher during\nwinter, from the ocean during summer, and from land during spring and summer.\nOcean heat content was the best predictor for most seasons and weather regimes\nbeyond week 2, highlighting the importance of sub-surface ocean conditions for\nS2S predictability. Soil temperature and water content were also important\npredictors. Climate patterns were associated with changes in the likelihood of\noccurrence for specific weather regimes, including the El Ni\\~no-Southern\nOscillation, Madden Julian Oscillation, North Pacific Gyre, and Indian Ocean\ndipole. This study quantifies predictability from some previously identified\nprocesses on the large-scale atmospheric circulation and gives insight into new\nsources for future study.","PeriodicalId":501166,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
It is largely understood that subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) predictability
arises from the atmospheric initial state during early lead times, the land
during intermediate lead times, and the ocean during later lead times. We
examine whether this hypothesis holds for the S2S prediction of weather regimes
by training a set of XGBoost models to predict weekly weather regimes over
North America at 1-to-8-week lead times. Each model used a different predictor
from one of the three considered Earth system components (atmosphere, ocean, or
land) sourced from reanalyses. Three additional models were trained using
land-, ocean-, or atmosphere-only predictors to capture process interactions
and leverage multiple signals within the respective Earth system component. We
found that each Earth system component performed more skillfully at different
forecast horizons, with sensitivity to seasonality and observed (i.e., ground
truth) weather regime. S2S predictability from the atmosphere was higher during
winter, from the ocean during summer, and from land during spring and summer.
Ocean heat content was the best predictor for most seasons and weather regimes
beyond week 2, highlighting the importance of sub-surface ocean conditions for
S2S predictability. Soil temperature and water content were also important
predictors. Climate patterns were associated with changes in the likelihood of
occurrence for specific weather regimes, including the El Ni\~no-Southern
Oscillation, Madden Julian Oscillation, North Pacific Gyre, and Indian Ocean
dipole. This study quantifies predictability from some previously identified
processes on the large-scale atmospheric circulation and gives insight into new
sources for future study.