An Earth-System-Oriented View of the S2S Predictability of North American Weather Regimes

Jhayron S. Pérez-Carrasquilla, Maria J. Molina
{"title":"An Earth-System-Oriented View of the S2S Predictability of North American Weather Regimes","authors":"Jhayron S. Pérez-Carrasquilla, Maria J. Molina","doi":"arxiv-2409.08174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is largely understood that subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) predictability\narises from the atmospheric initial state during early lead times, the land\nduring intermediate lead times, and the ocean during later lead times. We\nexamine whether this hypothesis holds for the S2S prediction of weather regimes\nby training a set of XGBoost models to predict weekly weather regimes over\nNorth America at 1-to-8-week lead times. Each model used a different predictor\nfrom one of the three considered Earth system components (atmosphere, ocean, or\nland) sourced from reanalyses. Three additional models were trained using\nland-, ocean-, or atmosphere-only predictors to capture process interactions\nand leverage multiple signals within the respective Earth system component. We\nfound that each Earth system component performed more skillfully at different\nforecast horizons, with sensitivity to seasonality and observed (i.e., ground\ntruth) weather regime. S2S predictability from the atmosphere was higher during\nwinter, from the ocean during summer, and from land during spring and summer.\nOcean heat content was the best predictor for most seasons and weather regimes\nbeyond week 2, highlighting the importance of sub-surface ocean conditions for\nS2S predictability. Soil temperature and water content were also important\npredictors. Climate patterns were associated with changes in the likelihood of\noccurrence for specific weather regimes, including the El Ni\\~no-Southern\nOscillation, Madden Julian Oscillation, North Pacific Gyre, and Indian Ocean\ndipole. This study quantifies predictability from some previously identified\nprocesses on the large-scale atmospheric circulation and gives insight into new\nsources for future study.","PeriodicalId":501166,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is largely understood that subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) predictability arises from the atmospheric initial state during early lead times, the land during intermediate lead times, and the ocean during later lead times. We examine whether this hypothesis holds for the S2S prediction of weather regimes by training a set of XGBoost models to predict weekly weather regimes over North America at 1-to-8-week lead times. Each model used a different predictor from one of the three considered Earth system components (atmosphere, ocean, or land) sourced from reanalyses. Three additional models were trained using land-, ocean-, or atmosphere-only predictors to capture process interactions and leverage multiple signals within the respective Earth system component. We found that each Earth system component performed more skillfully at different forecast horizons, with sensitivity to seasonality and observed (i.e., ground truth) weather regime. S2S predictability from the atmosphere was higher during winter, from the ocean during summer, and from land during spring and summer. Ocean heat content was the best predictor for most seasons and weather regimes beyond week 2, highlighting the importance of sub-surface ocean conditions for S2S predictability. Soil temperature and water content were also important predictors. Climate patterns were associated with changes in the likelihood of occurrence for specific weather regimes, including the El Ni\~no-Southern Oscillation, Madden Julian Oscillation, North Pacific Gyre, and Indian Ocean dipole. This study quantifies predictability from some previously identified processes on the large-scale atmospheric circulation and gives insight into new sources for future study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从地球系统角度看北美天气变化的 S2S 可预测性
人们普遍认为,亚季节到季节(S2S)可预测性产生于早期准备时间内的大气初始状态、中期准备时间内的陆地初始状态以及后期准备时间内的海洋初始状态。我们通过训练一组 XGBoost 模型来预测 1 至 8 周提前期北美地区的每周天气变化,从而检验这一假设是否适用于 S2S 天气变化预测。每个模型都使用了来自地球系统三个组成部分(大气、海洋或陆地)之一的不同预测因子。另外还使用陆地、海洋或仅大气的预测因子训练了三个模型,以捕捉过程的相互作用,并利用各自地球系统成分中的多种信号。我们发现,在不同的预测范围内,每个地球系统成分的表现都更为娴熟,对季节性和观测到的(即地面实况)天气状况也很敏感。海洋热含量是第 2 周以后大多数季节和天气状况的最佳预测指标,这突出表明了表层下海洋条件对 S2S 预测能力的重要性。土壤温度和含水量也是重要的预测因子。气候模式与特定天气状况发生可能性的变化有关,包括厄尔尼诺-南方涛动、马登-朱利安涛动、北太平洋环流和印度洋极。这项研究对以前确定的一些大尺度大气环流过程的可预测性进行了量化,并为今后的研究提供了新闻来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Harnessing AI data-driven global weather models for climate attribution: An analysis of the 2017 Oroville Dam extreme atmospheric river Super Resolution On Global Weather Forecasts Can Transfer Learning be Used to Identify Tropical State-Dependent Bias Relevant to Midlatitude Subseasonal Predictability? Using Generative Models to Produce Realistic Populations of the United Kingdom Windstorms Integrated nowcasting of convective precipitation with Transformer-based models using multi-source data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1