The future of offshore wind power production: wake and climate impacts

Simon C Warder, Matthew D Piggott
{"title":"The future of offshore wind power production: wake and climate impacts","authors":"Simon C Warder, Matthew D Piggott","doi":"arxiv-2408.14963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rapid deployment of offshore wind is expected within the coming decades to\nhelp meet climate goals. With offshore wind turbine lifetimes of 25-30 years,\nand new offshore leases spanning 60 years, it is vital to consider long-term\nchanges in potential wind power resource at the farm planning stage. Such\nchanges may arise from multiple sources, including climate change, and\nincreasing wake-induced power losses. In this work, we investigate and compare\nthese two sources of long-term change in wind power, for a case study\nconsisting of 21 wind farms within the German Bight. Consistent with previous\nstudies, we find a small but significant reduction in wind resource due to\nclimate change by the end of the 21st century under the high-emission RCP8.5\nscenario, compared with a historical period, with a mean power reduction (over\nan ensemble of seven climate models) of 2.1%. To assess the impact of\nwake-induced losses due to increasingly dense farm build-out, we model wakes\nwithin the German Bight region using an engineering wake model, under various\nstages of (planned) build-out corresponding to the years 2010-2027. By\nidentifying clusters of wind farms, we decompose wake effects into long-range\n(inter-cluster), medium-range (intra-cluster) and short-range (intra-farm)\neffects. Inter-cluster wake-induced losses increase from 0 for the 2010\nscenario to 2.5% for the 2027 scenario, with intra-cluster losses also\nincreasing from 0 to 4.3%. Intra-farm losses are relatively constant, at around\n13%. While the evolution of wake effects therefore outweighs the climate\neffect, and impacts over a shorter timescale, both factors are significant. We\nalso find evidence of non-linear interactions between the climate and wake\neffects. Both climate change and evolving wake effects must therefore be\nconsidered within resource assessment and wind farm planning.","PeriodicalId":501166,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.14963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rapid deployment of offshore wind is expected within the coming decades to help meet climate goals. With offshore wind turbine lifetimes of 25-30 years, and new offshore leases spanning 60 years, it is vital to consider long-term changes in potential wind power resource at the farm planning stage. Such changes may arise from multiple sources, including climate change, and increasing wake-induced power losses. In this work, we investigate and compare these two sources of long-term change in wind power, for a case study consisting of 21 wind farms within the German Bight. Consistent with previous studies, we find a small but significant reduction in wind resource due to climate change by the end of the 21st century under the high-emission RCP8.5 scenario, compared with a historical period, with a mean power reduction (over an ensemble of seven climate models) of 2.1%. To assess the impact of wake-induced losses due to increasingly dense farm build-out, we model wakes within the German Bight region using an engineering wake model, under various stages of (planned) build-out corresponding to the years 2010-2027. By identifying clusters of wind farms, we decompose wake effects into long-range (inter-cluster), medium-range (intra-cluster) and short-range (intra-farm) effects. Inter-cluster wake-induced losses increase from 0 for the 2010 scenario to 2.5% for the 2027 scenario, with intra-cluster losses also increasing from 0 to 4.3%. Intra-farm losses are relatively constant, at around 13%. While the evolution of wake effects therefore outweighs the climate effect, and impacts over a shorter timescale, both factors are significant. We also find evidence of non-linear interactions between the climate and wake effects. Both climate change and evolving wake effects must therefore be considered within resource assessment and wind farm planning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
海上风力发电的未来:唤醒和气候影响
预计在未来几十年内,海上风能将得到快速部署,以帮助实现气候目标。海上风力涡轮机的寿命为 25-30 年,新的海上租赁期为 60 年,因此在风电场规划阶段考虑潜在风能资源的长期变化至关重要。这种变化可能来自多个方面,包括气候变化和不断增加的尾流引起的功率损失。在这项工作中,我们针对德国港湾内的 21 个风电场进行了案例研究,调查并比较了风能长期变化的这两个来源。与之前的研究一致,我们发现到 21 世纪末,在高排放 RCP8.5 情景下,与历史时期相比,气候变化会导致风能资源小幅但显著地减少,平均功率减少 2.1%(在七个气候模型的组合中)。为了评估日益密集的风电场建设所造成的风浪损失影响,我们使用工程风浪模型,在 2010-2027 年不同(计划)建设阶段下,对德国 Bight 地区的风浪进行了建模。通过识别风电场集群,我们将唤醒效应分解为长程(集群间)、中程(集群内)和短程(场内)效应。在 2010 年的情景中,风场群间的唤醒损失为 0,而在 2027 年的情景中,唤醒损失增加到 2.5%,风场群内的唤醒损失也从 0 增加到 4.3%。农场内部损失相对稳定,约为 13%。因此,虽然唤醒效应的演变超过了气候效应,而且影响的时间尺度较短,但这两个因素都很重要。我们还发现了气候与唤醒效应之间非线性相互作用的证据。因此,在资源评估和风电场规划中,必须同时考虑气候变化和不断演变的尾流效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Harnessing AI data-driven global weather models for climate attribution: An analysis of the 2017 Oroville Dam extreme atmospheric river Super Resolution On Global Weather Forecasts Can Transfer Learning be Used to Identify Tropical State-Dependent Bias Relevant to Midlatitude Subseasonal Predictability? Using Generative Models to Produce Realistic Populations of the United Kingdom Windstorms Integrated nowcasting of convective precipitation with Transformer-based models using multi-source data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1