Complementary and Alternative Therapies for Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause : An Evidence Map.

IF 19.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Annals of Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.7326/annals-24-00603
Kristen E Ullman,Susan Diem,Mary L Forte,Kristine Ensrud,Catherine Sowerby,Nicholas Zerzan,Maylen Anthony,Adrienne Landsteiner,Nancy Greer,Mary Butler,Timothy J Wilt,Elisheva R Danan
{"title":"Complementary and Alternative Therapies for Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause : An Evidence Map.","authors":"Kristen E Ullman,Susan Diem,Mary L Forte,Kristine Ensrud,Catherine Sowerby,Nicholas Zerzan,Maylen Anthony,Adrienne Landsteiner,Nancy Greer,Mary Butler,Timothy J Wilt,Elisheva R Danan","doi":"10.7326/annals-24-00603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nWomen seeking nonhormonal interventions for vulvovaginal, urinary, and sexual symptoms associated with genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) may seek out complementary and alternative medicine or therapies (CAMs).\r\n\r\nPURPOSE\r\nTo summarize published evidence of CAMs for GSM.\r\n\r\nDATA SOURCES\r\nOvid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL from inception through 11 December 2023.\r\n\r\nSTUDY SELECTION\r\nRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) 8 weeks or more in duration that evaluated the effectiveness or harms of CAMs for postmenopausal women with GSM and reported 1 or more outcomes of interest, with sample sizes of 20 or more participants randomly assigned per group.\r\n\r\nDATA EXTRACTION\r\nData were abstracted by 1 reviewer and verified by a second.\r\n\r\nDATA SYNTHESIS\r\nAn evidence map approach was used to organize and describe trials. Studies were organized by type of intervention, with narrative summaries for population, study characteristics, interventions, and outcomes. Fifty-seven trials were identified that investigated 39 unique interventions. Studies were typically small (n < 200), and most were done in Iran (k = 24) or other parts of Asia (k = 9). Few trials evaluated similar combinations of populations, interventions, comparators, or outcomes. Most studies (k = 44) examined natural products (that is, herbal or botanical supplements and vitamins), whereas fewer reported on mind and body practices (k = 6) or educational programs (k = 7). Most studies reported 1 or 2 GSM symptoms, mainly sexual (k = 44) or vulvovaginal (k = 30). Tools used to measure outcomes varied widely. Most trials reported on adverse events (k = 33).\r\n\r\nLIMITATIONS\r\nOnly English-language studies were used. Effect estimates, risk of bias, and certainty of evidence were not assessed.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThere is a large and heterogeneous literature of CAM interventions for GSM. Trials were small, and few were done in North America. Standardized population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes reporting in future RCTs are needed.\r\n\r\nPRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE\r\nAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. (PROSPERO: CRD42023400684).","PeriodicalId":7932,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Internal Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":19.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7326/annals-24-00603","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Women seeking nonhormonal interventions for vulvovaginal, urinary, and sexual symptoms associated with genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) may seek out complementary and alternative medicine or therapies (CAMs). PURPOSE To summarize published evidence of CAMs for GSM. DATA SOURCES Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL from inception through 11 December 2023. STUDY SELECTION Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) 8 weeks or more in duration that evaluated the effectiveness or harms of CAMs for postmenopausal women with GSM and reported 1 or more outcomes of interest, with sample sizes of 20 or more participants randomly assigned per group. DATA EXTRACTION Data were abstracted by 1 reviewer and verified by a second. DATA SYNTHESIS An evidence map approach was used to organize and describe trials. Studies were organized by type of intervention, with narrative summaries for population, study characteristics, interventions, and outcomes. Fifty-seven trials were identified that investigated 39 unique interventions. Studies were typically small (n < 200), and most were done in Iran (k = 24) or other parts of Asia (k = 9). Few trials evaluated similar combinations of populations, interventions, comparators, or outcomes. Most studies (k = 44) examined natural products (that is, herbal or botanical supplements and vitamins), whereas fewer reported on mind and body practices (k = 6) or educational programs (k = 7). Most studies reported 1 or 2 GSM symptoms, mainly sexual (k = 44) or vulvovaginal (k = 30). Tools used to measure outcomes varied widely. Most trials reported on adverse events (k = 33). LIMITATIONS Only English-language studies were used. Effect estimates, risk of bias, and certainty of evidence were not assessed. CONCLUSION There is a large and heterogeneous literature of CAM interventions for GSM. Trials were small, and few were done in North America. Standardized population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes reporting in future RCTs are needed. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. (PROSPERO: CRD42023400684).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
更年期泌尿生殖系统综合症的补充和替代疗法:证据图。
背景妇女在寻求与绝经期泌尿生殖系统综合征(GSM)相关的外阴阴道、泌尿和性症状的非激素干预措施时,可能会寻求补充和替代医学或疗法(CAMs).目的总结已发表的 CAMs 治疗 GSM 的证据.数据来源Ovid MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 CINAHL(从开始到 2023 年 12 月 11 日).研究筛选随机对照试验(RCT)持续时间为 8 周或更长,这些试验评估了 CAMs 对绝经后 GSM 妇女的有效性或危害性,并报告了 1 个或多个相关结果,每组随机分配的样本量为 20 名或更多参与者。研究按照干预类型进行组织,并对人群、研究特征、干预和结果进行了叙述性总结。共确定了 57 项试验,调查了 39 种独特的干预措施。研究的规模通常较小(n < 200),大多数研究是在伊朗(k = 24)或亚洲其他地区(k = 9)进行的。很少有试验对人群、干预措施、比较对象或结果的相似组合进行评估。大多数研究(k = 44)检查了天然产品(即草药或植物补充剂和维生素),而较少研究报告了身心实践(k = 6)或教育计划(k = 7)。大多数研究报告了 1 或 2 种 GSM 症状,主要是性症状(k = 44)或外阴阴道症状(k = 30)。用于衡量结果的工具差异很大。大多数试验报告了不良事件(k = 33)。未对效果估计值、偏倚风险和证据的确定性进行评估。结论:有大量不同类型的文献报道了针对 GSM 的 CAM 干预措施。试验规模较小,且很少在北美进行。未来的 RCT 需要标准化的人群、干预措施、比较对象和结果报告。(PROCEMO:CRD42023400684)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Internal Medicine
Annals of Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
23.90
自引率
1.80%
发文量
1136
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians (ACP), Annals of Internal Medicine is the premier internal medicine journal. Annals of Internal Medicine’s mission is to promote excellence in medicine, enable physicians and other health care professionals to be well informed members of the medical community and society, advance standards in the conduct and reporting of medical research, and contribute to improving the health of people worldwide. To achieve this mission, the journal publishes a wide variety of original research, review articles, practice guidelines, and commentary relevant to clinical practice, health care delivery, public health, health care policy, medical education, ethics, and research methodology. In addition, the journal publishes personal narratives that convey the feeling and the art of medicine.
期刊最新文献
In subclinical AF, the benefit of apixaban vs. aspirin on stroke or systemic embolism trended higher with CHA2DS2-VASc >4. In symptomatic knee OA, adding oral methotrexate to usual analgesia reduced pain at 6 mo. In T2D, SGLT-2 inhibitor effects on CV and kidney outcomes were consistent regardless of GLP-1 receptor agonist use. Patient Travel Patterns and Concordance With Geographic Market Boundaries. Patients surviving COVID-19 had lower risk for long COVID in the Omicron vs. earlier eras.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1