Nicole L Spartano,Naznin Sultana,Honghuang Lin,Huimin Cheng,Sophia Lu,David Fei,Joanne M Murabito,Maura E Walker,Howard A Wolpert,Devin W Steenkamp
{"title":"Defining continuous glucose monitor time in range in a large community-based cohort without diabetes.","authors":"Nicole L Spartano,Naznin Sultana,Honghuang Lin,Huimin Cheng,Sophia Lu,David Fei,Joanne M Murabito,Maura E Walker,Howard A Wolpert,Devin W Steenkamp","doi":"10.1210/clinem/dgae626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT\r\nContinuous glucose monitor (CGM) companies are beginning to market these sensors to populations without diabetes, but the range of CGM values clinicians should expect to see for this population is unclear because there have been no large studies reporting these ranges.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nTo report the physiological range of continuous glucose monitor (CGM) time in range values observed across glycemic status, including individuals without diabetes, to serve as a reference for clinicians.\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nThe Framingham Heart Study, a prospective cohort study.\r\n\r\nSETTING\r\nCommunity-dwelling individuals.\r\n\r\nPATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS\r\nAdults with normoglycemia (n=560), prediabetes (n=463), and diabetes (n=152).\r\n\r\nINTERVENTION\r\nWe conducted a cross-sectional investigation in participants who wore a Dexcom G6 Pro CGM for ≥7 complete days.\r\n\r\nMAIN OUTCOME MEASURES\r\nCGM metrics including mean glucose and time spent in glucose ranges.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nNormoglycemic participants (mean age 58.5y, 64.5% women, 93.3% non-Hispanic white) spent 87.0% time in the 70-140mg/dL CGM range, and, on average, >15min/day (1.2% time) >180mg/dL. Furthermore, normoglycemic participants spent ∼3 hours/day (12.1% time) with CGM glucose >140mg/dL. On average, participants with prediabetes and diabetes spent 77.1% and 46.2% time in 70-140mg/dL, respectively.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nOur results contribute to the understanding of the physiological CGM range in >1000 participants without diabetes. These results are also important for clinicians to reference as CGM sensors become more widely accessible to people without known diabetes.","PeriodicalId":22632,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":"100 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgae626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
CONTEXT
Continuous glucose monitor (CGM) companies are beginning to market these sensors to populations without diabetes, but the range of CGM values clinicians should expect to see for this population is unclear because there have been no large studies reporting these ranges.
OBJECTIVE
To report the physiological range of continuous glucose monitor (CGM) time in range values observed across glycemic status, including individuals without diabetes, to serve as a reference for clinicians.
DESIGN
The Framingham Heart Study, a prospective cohort study.
SETTING
Community-dwelling individuals.
PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS
Adults with normoglycemia (n=560), prediabetes (n=463), and diabetes (n=152).
INTERVENTION
We conducted a cross-sectional investigation in participants who wore a Dexcom G6 Pro CGM for ≥7 complete days.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
CGM metrics including mean glucose and time spent in glucose ranges.
RESULTS
Normoglycemic participants (mean age 58.5y, 64.5% women, 93.3% non-Hispanic white) spent 87.0% time in the 70-140mg/dL CGM range, and, on average, >15min/day (1.2% time) >180mg/dL. Furthermore, normoglycemic participants spent ∼3 hours/day (12.1% time) with CGM glucose >140mg/dL. On average, participants with prediabetes and diabetes spent 77.1% and 46.2% time in 70-140mg/dL, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results contribute to the understanding of the physiological CGM range in >1000 participants without diabetes. These results are also important for clinicians to reference as CGM sensors become more widely accessible to people without known diabetes.
CONTEXTC 连续血糖监测仪 (CGM) 公司开始向无糖尿病人群销售这些传感器,但临床医生在这一人群中应该看到的 CGM 值范围尚不清楚,因为还没有大型研究报告这些范围。OBJECTIVETO report the physiological range of continuous glucose monitor (CGM) time in range values observed across glycemic status, including individuals without diabetes, to serve as a reference for clinicians.设计弗雷明汉心脏研究,一项前瞻性队列研究。患者或参与者成人血糖正常者(560 人)、糖尿病前期者(463 人)和糖尿病患者(152 人).干预我们对佩戴 Dexcom G6 Pro CGM≥7 天的参与者进行了横断面调查。结果正常血糖参与者(平均年龄 58.5 岁,64.5% 为女性,93.3% 为非西班牙裔白人)87.0% 的时间在 70-140mg/dL CGM 范围内,平均 >180mg/dL >15 分钟/天(1.2% 的时间)。此外,血糖正常的参与者每天有 3 小时(12.1% 的时间)在 CGM 血糖 >140mg/dL 的范围内。结论我们的研究结果有助于了解 1000 多名无糖尿病参与者的 CGM 生理范围。随着 CGM 传感器越来越广泛地应用于未发现糖尿病的人群,这些结果对于临床医生来说也具有重要的参考价值。