Defining continuous glucose monitor time in range in a large community-based cohort without diabetes.

Nicole L Spartano,Naznin Sultana,Honghuang Lin,Huimin Cheng,Sophia Lu,David Fei,Joanne M Murabito,Maura E Walker,Howard A Wolpert,Devin W Steenkamp
{"title":"Defining continuous glucose monitor time in range in a large community-based cohort without diabetes.","authors":"Nicole L Spartano,Naznin Sultana,Honghuang Lin,Huimin Cheng,Sophia Lu,David Fei,Joanne M Murabito,Maura E Walker,Howard A Wolpert,Devin W Steenkamp","doi":"10.1210/clinem/dgae626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT\r\nContinuous glucose monitor (CGM) companies are beginning to market these sensors to populations without diabetes, but the range of CGM values clinicians should expect to see for this population is unclear because there have been no large studies reporting these ranges.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nTo report the physiological range of continuous glucose monitor (CGM) time in range values observed across glycemic status, including individuals without diabetes, to serve as a reference for clinicians.\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nThe Framingham Heart Study, a prospective cohort study.\r\n\r\nSETTING\r\nCommunity-dwelling individuals.\r\n\r\nPATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS\r\nAdults with normoglycemia (n=560), prediabetes (n=463), and diabetes (n=152).\r\n\r\nINTERVENTION\r\nWe conducted a cross-sectional investigation in participants who wore a Dexcom G6 Pro CGM for ≥7 complete days.\r\n\r\nMAIN OUTCOME MEASURES\r\nCGM metrics including mean glucose and time spent in glucose ranges.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nNormoglycemic participants (mean age 58.5y, 64.5% women, 93.3% non-Hispanic white) spent 87.0% time in the 70-140mg/dL CGM range, and, on average, >15min/day (1.2% time) >180mg/dL. Furthermore, normoglycemic participants spent ∼3 hours/day (12.1% time) with CGM glucose >140mg/dL. On average, participants with prediabetes and diabetes spent 77.1% and 46.2% time in 70-140mg/dL, respectively.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nOur results contribute to the understanding of the physiological CGM range in >1000 participants without diabetes. These results are also important for clinicians to reference as CGM sensors become more widely accessible to people without known diabetes.","PeriodicalId":22632,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":"100 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgae626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CONTEXT Continuous glucose monitor (CGM) companies are beginning to market these sensors to populations without diabetes, but the range of CGM values clinicians should expect to see for this population is unclear because there have been no large studies reporting these ranges. OBJECTIVE To report the physiological range of continuous glucose monitor (CGM) time in range values observed across glycemic status, including individuals without diabetes, to serve as a reference for clinicians. DESIGN The Framingham Heart Study, a prospective cohort study. SETTING Community-dwelling individuals. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS Adults with normoglycemia (n=560), prediabetes (n=463), and diabetes (n=152). INTERVENTION We conducted a cross-sectional investigation in participants who wore a Dexcom G6 Pro CGM for ≥7 complete days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES CGM metrics including mean glucose and time spent in glucose ranges. RESULTS Normoglycemic participants (mean age 58.5y, 64.5% women, 93.3% non-Hispanic white) spent 87.0% time in the 70-140mg/dL CGM range, and, on average, >15min/day (1.2% time) >180mg/dL. Furthermore, normoglycemic participants spent ∼3 hours/day (12.1% time) with CGM glucose >140mg/dL. On average, participants with prediabetes and diabetes spent 77.1% and 46.2% time in 70-140mg/dL, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our results contribute to the understanding of the physiological CGM range in >1000 participants without diabetes. These results are also important for clinicians to reference as CGM sensors become more widely accessible to people without known diabetes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在一个以社区为基础的大型无糖尿病人群中定义连续血糖监测仪的量程时间。
CONTEXTC 连续血糖监测仪 (CGM) 公司开始向无糖尿病人群销售这些传感器,但临床医生在这一人群中应该看到的 CGM 值范围尚不清楚,因为还没有大型研究报告这些范围。OBJECTIVETO report the physiological range of continuous glucose monitor (CGM) time in range values observed across glycemic status, including individuals without diabetes, to serve as a reference for clinicians.设计弗雷明汉心脏研究,一项前瞻性队列研究。患者或参与者成人血糖正常者(560 人)、糖尿病前期者(463 人)和糖尿病患者(152 人).干预我们对佩戴 Dexcom G6 Pro CGM≥7 天的参与者进行了横断面调查。结果正常血糖参与者(平均年龄 58.5 岁,64.5% 为女性,93.3% 为非西班牙裔白人)87.0% 的时间在 70-140mg/dL CGM 范围内,平均 >180mg/dL >15 分钟/天(1.2% 的时间)。此外,血糖正常的参与者每天有 3 小时(12.1% 的时间)在 CGM 血糖 >140mg/dL 的范围内。结论我们的研究结果有助于了解 1000 多名无糖尿病参与者的 CGM 生理范围。随着 CGM 传感器越来越广泛地应用于未发现糖尿病的人群,这些结果对于临床医生来说也具有重要的参考价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and safety of targeted therapy for radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer: a meta-analysis. Treatment Preferences in Patients with Hypothyroidism: an Analysis of Eleven Randomized Controlled Trials. Metabolomics: A Promising Tool in the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Obesity. Association between papillary thyroid cancer and primary aldosteronism in individuals with hypertension. The changing treatment paradigm in prolactinoma - a prospective series of 100 consecutive neurosurgical cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1