Rapid de-escalation of anti-MRSA therapy guided by S. aureus nares screening for patients with pneumonia: protocol of a randomized controlled trial (SNAP study)

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Frontiers in Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.3389/fmed.2024.1416904
Elda De Vita, Francesco Vladimiro Segala, Francesco Cavallin, Giacomo Guido, Luisa Frallonardo, Sergio Cotugno, Carmen Pellegrino, Francesco Di Gennaro, Annalisa Saracino
{"title":"Rapid de-escalation of anti-MRSA therapy guided by S. aureus nares screening for patients with pneumonia: protocol of a randomized controlled trial (SNAP study)","authors":"Elda De Vita, Francesco Vladimiro Segala, Francesco Cavallin, Giacomo Guido, Luisa Frallonardo, Sergio Cotugno, Carmen Pellegrino, Francesco Di Gennaro, Annalisa Saracino","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2024.1416904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionThe current Infectious Disease Society of America and American Thoracic Society (IDSA/ATS) guidelines recommend linezolid or vancomycin as an empiric treatment for methicillin-resistant <jats:italic>Staphylococcus aureus</jats:italic> (MRSA) pneumonia in hospitalized patients with specific risk factors,. A nasal PCR-assay for MRSA, with its high negative predictive value, can guide a rapid antibiotic de-escalation avoiding unnecessary anti-MRSA treatment. The indiscriminate use of these drugs has contributed to the emergence of resistant <jats:italic>S. aureus</jats:italic> strains leading to adverse effects without any survival benefit, increasing hospital stays and associated costs. Aim of the study is the use of this diagnostic tool to reduce empirical anti-MRSA treatment duration in pneumonia, shortening antimicrobial therapy days while measuring in-hospital mortality, length of stay and adverse drug event incidence.MethodsIt is a prospective, randomized single-center controlled trial planned to be conducted in the Azienda Consorziale Policlinico di Bari. The research project will have a duration of 12 months following the approval of the Ethical Committee of the University of Bari. The minimum sample size is 38 patients per group, for a total of 76 subjects, calculated assuming a standard deviation of 10, a power of 90%, a type I error of 5% and a 10% drop-out rate. We will enroll eligible patients ensuring their evidence-based management according to guidelines, we will perform a nasal swab for MRSA in patients in the experimental group and discontinue the empirical anti-MRSA therapy if the nasal swab result is negative. For both arms, follow-up visits will be on day 2, 5, 7, 14, and 28 relatives to the enrollment visit (day 0). Data will be collected on the clinical course of pneumonia and laboratory tests.DiscussionOur study will provide evidence on the duration (in days) of the antibiotic intake as a primary outcome of the study. Secondary outcome measures include in-hospital mortality, the length of stay and days of mechanical ventilation (in VAP), and the incidence of adverse events related to the administration of the therapy.Clinical trial registration<jats:uri>https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06238297</jats:uri>, identifier NCT06238297.","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1416904","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionThe current Infectious Disease Society of America and American Thoracic Society (IDSA/ATS) guidelines recommend linezolid or vancomycin as an empiric treatment for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) pneumonia in hospitalized patients with specific risk factors,. A nasal PCR-assay for MRSA, with its high negative predictive value, can guide a rapid antibiotic de-escalation avoiding unnecessary anti-MRSA treatment. The indiscriminate use of these drugs has contributed to the emergence of resistant S. aureus strains leading to adverse effects without any survival benefit, increasing hospital stays and associated costs. Aim of the study is the use of this diagnostic tool to reduce empirical anti-MRSA treatment duration in pneumonia, shortening antimicrobial therapy days while measuring in-hospital mortality, length of stay and adverse drug event incidence.MethodsIt is a prospective, randomized single-center controlled trial planned to be conducted in the Azienda Consorziale Policlinico di Bari. The research project will have a duration of 12 months following the approval of the Ethical Committee of the University of Bari. The minimum sample size is 38 patients per group, for a total of 76 subjects, calculated assuming a standard deviation of 10, a power of 90%, a type I error of 5% and a 10% drop-out rate. We will enroll eligible patients ensuring their evidence-based management according to guidelines, we will perform a nasal swab for MRSA in patients in the experimental group and discontinue the empirical anti-MRSA therapy if the nasal swab result is negative. For both arms, follow-up visits will be on day 2, 5, 7, 14, and 28 relatives to the enrollment visit (day 0). Data will be collected on the clinical course of pneumonia and laboratory tests.DiscussionOur study will provide evidence on the duration (in days) of the antibiotic intake as a primary outcome of the study. Secondary outcome measures include in-hospital mortality, the length of stay and days of mechanical ventilation (in VAP), and the incidence of adverse events related to the administration of the therapy.Clinical trial registrationhttps://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06238297, identifier NCT06238297.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肺炎患者在金黄色葡萄球菌鼻孔筛查的指导下快速调整抗 MRSA 治疗:随机对照试验(SNAP 研究)方案
导言美国传染病学会和美国胸科学会(IDSA/ATS)的现行指南推荐利奈唑胺或万古霉素作为具有特定风险因素的住院患者耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)肺炎的经验性治疗药物。鼻腔 MRSA PCR 检测具有较高的阴性预测值,可指导快速降低抗生素浓度,避免不必要的抗 MRSA 治疗。滥用这些药物导致耐药金黄色葡萄球菌菌株的出现,造成不良影响,却没有任何生存益处,增加了住院时间和相关费用。这项研究的目的是利用这一诊断工具缩短肺炎患者的经验性抗金黄色葡萄球菌治疗时间,缩短抗菌治疗天数,同时测量院内死亡率、住院时间和药物不良事件发生率。经巴里大学伦理委员会批准后,该研究项目将持续 12 个月。最小样本量为每组 38 名患者,共 76 名受试者,假设标准偏差为 10,功率为 90%,I 型误差为 5%,辍学率为 10%。我们将根据指南对符合条件的患者进行循证管理,我们将对实验组患者进行鼻拭子检测,如果鼻拭子检测结果为阴性,则停止经验性抗 MRSA 治疗。两组患者的随访时间均为入组后的第 2、5、7、14 和 28 天(第 0 天)。讨论我们的研究将提供抗生素摄入持续时间(天数)的证据,作为研究的主要结果。次要结果指标包括院内死亡率、住院时间和机械通气天数(VAP)以及与治疗相关的不良事件发生率。临床试验注册https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06238297,标识符为NCT06238297。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers in Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
3710
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate - the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions - the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines - the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities - access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide - addressing the grand health challenges around the world
期刊最新文献
Adult diffuse hepatic hemangiomatosis lesion occupying the entire abdominal and pelvic cavities: a case report. Applications of optical coherence tomography angiography in glaucoma: current status and future directions. Case report: A suspected case of chronic pulmonary sparganosis characterized by migrating cavities and tunnel sign. Comparing the effectiveness and safety of videolaryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation in the paediatric emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Comparison of ustekinumab, infliximab and combination therapy in moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis - a study protocol of a randomized, multicenter, head-to-head COMBO-UC trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1