Beamline Steering Using Deep Learning Models

Dexter Allen, Isaac Kante, Dorian Bohler
{"title":"Beamline Steering Using Deep Learning Models","authors":"Dexter Allen, Isaac Kante, Dorian Bohler","doi":"arxiv-2408.13657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Beam steering involves the calibration of the angle and position at which a\nparticle accelerator's electron beam is incident upon the x-ray target with\nrespect to the rotation axis of the collimator. Beam Steering is an essential\ntask for light sources. The Linac To Undulator is very difficult to steer and\naim due to the changes of each use of the accelerator there must be\nre-calibration of magnets. However with each use of the Beamline its current\nmethod of steering runs into issues when faced with calibrating angles and\npositions. Human operators spend a substantial amount of time and resources on\nthe task. We developed multiple different feed-forward-neural networks with\nvarying hyper-parameters, inputs, and outputs, seeking to compare their\nperformance. Specifically, our smaller models with 33 inputs and 13 outputs\noutperformed the larger models with 73 inputs and 50 outputs. We propose the\nfollowing explanations for this lack of performance in larger models. First, a\nlack of training time and computational power limited the ability of our models\nto mature. Given more time, our models would outperform SVD. Second, when the\ninput size of the model increases the noise increases as well. In this case\nmore inputs corresponded to a greater length upon the LINAC accelerator. Less\nspecific and larger models that seek to make more predictions will inherently\nperform worse than SVD.","PeriodicalId":501318,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Accelerator Physics","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Accelerator Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.13657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Beam steering involves the calibration of the angle and position at which a particle accelerator's electron beam is incident upon the x-ray target with respect to the rotation axis of the collimator. Beam Steering is an essential task for light sources. The Linac To Undulator is very difficult to steer and aim due to the changes of each use of the accelerator there must be re-calibration of magnets. However with each use of the Beamline its current method of steering runs into issues when faced with calibrating angles and positions. Human operators spend a substantial amount of time and resources on the task. We developed multiple different feed-forward-neural networks with varying hyper-parameters, inputs, and outputs, seeking to compare their performance. Specifically, our smaller models with 33 inputs and 13 outputs outperformed the larger models with 73 inputs and 50 outputs. We propose the following explanations for this lack of performance in larger models. First, a lack of training time and computational power limited the ability of our models to mature. Given more time, our models would outperform SVD. Second, when the input size of the model increases the noise increases as well. In this case more inputs corresponded to a greater length upon the LINAC accelerator. Less specific and larger models that seek to make more predictions will inherently perform worse than SVD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用深度学习模型进行光束线引导
光束转向包括校准粒子加速器的电子束入射到 X 射线靶上时相对于准直器旋转轴的角度和位置。光束转向是光源的一项基本任务。由于每次使用加速器都会发生变化,因此必须对磁铁进行校准。然而,每次使用光束线时,其现有的转向方法都会在校准角度和位置时遇到问题。人类操作员需要花费大量的时间和资源来完成这项任务。我们开发了多种超参数、输入和输出各不相同的前馈神经网络,以比较它们的性能。具体来说,我们采用 33 个输入和 13 个输出的较小模型优于采用 73 个输入和 50 个输出的较大模型。我们对大型模型缺乏性能提出了以下解释。首先,缺乏训练时间和计算能力限制了我们模型的成熟。如果有更多的时间,我们的模型将优于 SVD。其次,当模型的输入大小增加时,噪声也会增加。在这种情况下,更多的输入对应于更长的 LINAC 加速器。如果模型的特异性较低,且规模较大,那么在进行更多预测时,其表现必然会比 SVD 差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Potential of Resonance Islands and Bent Crystals for a Novel Slow Extraction from Circular Hadron Accelerators Space Charge and Future Light Sources Beam Dynamics simulations for ERDC project -- SRF linac for industrial use Realizing Steady-State Microbunching with Optical Stochastic Crystallization Towards Agentic AI on Particle Accelerators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1