{"title":"Rescaling transformations and the Grothendieck bound formalism in a single quantum system","authors":"A. Vourdas","doi":"arxiv-2409.07270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Grothedieck bound formalism is studied using `rescaling transformations',\nin the context of a single quantum system. The rescaling transformations\nenlarge the set of unitary transformations (which apply to isolated systems),\nwith transformations that change not only the phase but also the absolute value\nof the wavefunction, and can be linked to irreversible phenomena (e.g., quantum\ntunnelling, damping and amplification, etc). A special case of rescaling\ntransformations are the dequantisation transformations, which map a Hilbert\nspace formalism into a formalism of scalars. The Grothendieck formalism\nconsiders a `classical' quadratic form ${\\cal C}(\\theta)$ which takes values\nless than $1$, and the corresponding `quantum' quadratic form ${\\cal\nQ}(\\theta)$ which takes values greater than $1$, up to the complex Grothendieck\nconstant $k_G$. It is shown that ${\\cal Q}(\\theta)$ can be expressed as the\ntrace of the product of $\\theta$ with two rescaling matrices, and ${\\cal\nC}(\\theta)$ can be expressed as the trace of the product of $\\theta$ with two\ndequantisation matrices. Values of ${\\cal Q}(\\theta)$ in the `ultra-quantum'\nregion $(1,k_G)$ are very important, because this region is classically\nforbidden (${\\cal C}(\\theta)$ cannot take values in it). An example with ${\\cal\nQ}(\\theta)\\in (1,k_G)$ is given, which is related to phenomena where\nclassically isolated by high potentials regions of space, communicate through\nquantum tunnelling. Other examples show that `ultra-quantumness' according to\nthe Grothendieck formalism (${\\cal Q}(\\theta)\\in (1,k_G)$), is different from\nquantumness according to other criteria (like quantum interference or the\nuncertainty principle).","PeriodicalId":501312,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - MATH - Mathematical Physics","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - MATH - Mathematical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.07270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Grothedieck bound formalism is studied using `rescaling transformations',
in the context of a single quantum system. The rescaling transformations
enlarge the set of unitary transformations (which apply to isolated systems),
with transformations that change not only the phase but also the absolute value
of the wavefunction, and can be linked to irreversible phenomena (e.g., quantum
tunnelling, damping and amplification, etc). A special case of rescaling
transformations are the dequantisation transformations, which map a Hilbert
space formalism into a formalism of scalars. The Grothendieck formalism
considers a `classical' quadratic form ${\cal C}(\theta)$ which takes values
less than $1$, and the corresponding `quantum' quadratic form ${\cal
Q}(\theta)$ which takes values greater than $1$, up to the complex Grothendieck
constant $k_G$. It is shown that ${\cal Q}(\theta)$ can be expressed as the
trace of the product of $\theta$ with two rescaling matrices, and ${\cal
C}(\theta)$ can be expressed as the trace of the product of $\theta$ with two
dequantisation matrices. Values of ${\cal Q}(\theta)$ in the `ultra-quantum'
region $(1,k_G)$ are very important, because this region is classically
forbidden (${\cal C}(\theta)$ cannot take values in it). An example with ${\cal
Q}(\theta)\in (1,k_G)$ is given, which is related to phenomena where
classically isolated by high potentials regions of space, communicate through
quantum tunnelling. Other examples show that `ultra-quantumness' according to
the Grothendieck formalism (${\cal Q}(\theta)\in (1,k_G)$), is different from
quantumness according to other criteria (like quantum interference or the
uncertainty principle).