New histological risk grading system for prediction of lymph node metastasis in patients with penile cancer

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY Virchows Archiv Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1007/s00428-024-03916-3
Luiza Dorofte, Sabina Davidsson, Jessica Carlsson, Gabriella Lillsunde Larsson, Mats G. Karlsson
{"title":"New histological risk grading system for prediction of lymph node metastasis in patients with penile cancer","authors":"Luiza Dorofte, Sabina Davidsson, Jessica Carlsson, Gabriella Lillsunde Larsson, Mats G. Karlsson","doi":"10.1007/s00428-024-03916-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Inguinal lymph node surgery is a standard treatment for penile cancer patients with intermediate or high risk for lymph node metastasis (LNM) according to European Association of Urology (EAU) risk grading. We are proposing a more objective histological prognostic grading system for inguinal LNM in these patients. We assessed worst pattern of invasion, lymphocytic host response, lymphovascular invasion, and perineural invasion in a population-based cohort of 306 penile cancer patients. Patients were classified into low, intermediate, and high risk for inguinal LNM. There was a significant association both between risk groups and pT stage (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and between risk groups and LNM. Univariate logistic regression showed 25.43 times higher odds of LNM for patients in the intermediate risk group compared with the low risk group (odds ratio (OR) 25.43; 95% confidence interval (CI): 5.94–108.97) and a 177.13 times higher odds in the high risk group compared to the low risk group (OR 177.13; 95% CI: 40.09–782.51). When comparing our histological risk grading with the EAU grading, we found a higher sensitivity, of 51.28% (95% CI: 45.68–56.88) versus 37.09% (95% CI: 31.68–42.50), as well as a higher area under the curve (0.86; 95% CI: 0.81–0.89; versus 0.65; 95% CI: 0.58–0.71) with our grading system. While our grading classified 111 patients as low risk, only 31 were considered low risk for LNM according to the EAU risk classification. The new histological risk grading system shows a higher sensitivity and includes a higher number of patients in the low risk group in whom lymph node surgery could be avoided, reducing morbidity and costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23514,"journal":{"name":"Virchows Archiv","volume":"281 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virchows Archiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-024-03916-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inguinal lymph node surgery is a standard treatment for penile cancer patients with intermediate or high risk for lymph node metastasis (LNM) according to European Association of Urology (EAU) risk grading. We are proposing a more objective histological prognostic grading system for inguinal LNM in these patients. We assessed worst pattern of invasion, lymphocytic host response, lymphovascular invasion, and perineural invasion in a population-based cohort of 306 penile cancer patients. Patients were classified into low, intermediate, and high risk for inguinal LNM. There was a significant association both between risk groups and pT stage (p < 0.001) and between risk groups and LNM. Univariate logistic regression showed 25.43 times higher odds of LNM for patients in the intermediate risk group compared with the low risk group (odds ratio (OR) 25.43; 95% confidence interval (CI): 5.94–108.97) and a 177.13 times higher odds in the high risk group compared to the low risk group (OR 177.13; 95% CI: 40.09–782.51). When comparing our histological risk grading with the EAU grading, we found a higher sensitivity, of 51.28% (95% CI: 45.68–56.88) versus 37.09% (95% CI: 31.68–42.50), as well as a higher area under the curve (0.86; 95% CI: 0.81–0.89; versus 0.65; 95% CI: 0.58–0.71) with our grading system. While our grading classified 111 patients as low risk, only 31 were considered low risk for LNM according to the EAU risk classification. The new histological risk grading system shows a higher sensitivity and includes a higher number of patients in the low risk group in whom lymph node surgery could be avoided, reducing morbidity and costs.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测阴茎癌患者淋巴结转移的新组织学风险分级系统
根据欧洲泌尿外科协会(EAU)的风险分级,腹股沟淋巴结手术是中度或高度淋巴结转移(LNM)风险阴茎癌患者的标准治疗方法。我们正在为这些患者的腹股沟淋巴结转移提出一个更客观的组织学预后分级系统。我们对 306 名阴茎癌患者的人群队列中最差的侵袭模式、淋巴细胞宿主反应、淋巴管侵袭和神经周围侵袭进行了评估。患者被分为腹股沟淋巴结转移的低危、中危和高危。风险组别与pT分期(p <0.001)之间以及风险组别与LNM之间均存在明显关联。单变量逻辑回归显示,与低风险组相比,中风险组患者发生 LNM 的几率高出 25.43 倍(几率比 (OR) 25.43;95% 置信区间 (CI):5.94-108.97),与低风险组相比,高风险组患者发生 LNM 的几率高出 177.13 倍(OR 177.13;95% CI:40.09-782.51)。在将我们的组织学风险分级与 EAU 分级进行比较时,我们发现我们的分级系统具有更高的灵敏度(51.28% (95% CI: 45.68-56.88) 对 37.09% (95% CI: 31.68-42.50))和更高的曲线下面积(0.86; 95% CI: 0.81-0.89; 对 0.65; 95% CI: 0.58-0.71)。虽然我们的分级将 111 例患者归为低风险,但根据 EAU 风险分级,只有 31 例患者被认为是 LNM 低风险患者。新的组织学风险分级系统显示出更高的灵敏度,并将更多患者纳入低风险组,这些患者可以避免淋巴结手术,从而降低发病率和费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Virchows Archiv
Virchows Archiv 医学-病理学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Manuscripts of original studies reinforcing the evidence base of modern diagnostic pathology, using immunocytochemical, molecular and ultrastructural techniques, will be welcomed. In addition, papers on critical evaluation of diagnostic criteria but also broadsheets and guidelines with a solid evidence base will be considered. Consideration will also be given to reports of work in other fields relevant to the understanding of human pathology as well as manuscripts on the application of new methods and techniques in pathology. Submission of purely experimental articles is discouraged but manuscripts on experimental work applicable to diagnostic pathology are welcomed. Biomarker studies are welcomed but need to abide by strict rules (e.g. REMARK) of adequate sample size and relevant marker choice. Single marker studies on limited patient series without validated application will as a rule not be considered. Case reports will only be considered when they provide substantial new information with an impact on understanding disease or diagnostic practice.
期刊最新文献
Heterogeneity of pancreatic neoplasms arising in pancreatic heterotopia: a single institution review. Massive parallel sequencing of head and neck conventional squamous cell carcinomas: A comprehensive review. A molecular and immunohistochemical study of 37 cases of ovarian Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor. Expanding horizons in a new era for pathology: perspectives from the ASCO meeting. Low CXCL11 expression is indicative of poor prognosis in rectal cancer patients undergoing preoperative chemoradiotherapy: a retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1