Treatment of Diaphyseal Tibial Non-unions After Open Fracture: A Retrospective Observational Study on Characteristics and Outcomes

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2024-08-18 DOI:10.1007/s43465-024-01235-y
R. Strain, P. J. Harwood, N. K. Kanakaris, P. V. Giannoudis
{"title":"Treatment of Diaphyseal Tibial Non-unions After Open Fracture: A Retrospective Observational Study on Characteristics and Outcomes","authors":"R. Strain, P. J. Harwood, N. K. Kanakaris, P. V. Giannoudis","doi":"10.1007/s43465-024-01235-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>Non-union is a significant complication following open diaphyseal tibia fractures. Management can be complex and unpredictable. Several principles must be addressed often in combination to achieve union. The aim of this study is to report on the characteristics, management and eventual outcome of non-united open tibial fractures over a 12-year period from a level I trauma centre.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This is a retrospective observational study of all adults (age 18 years and older) presenting to a level 1 trauma centre with a diaphyseal tibia fracture. Non-union was diagnosed using the standard FDA definition of incomplete union by 9 months or no progress to union in the preceding 3 months. Injury and patient demographics in addition to all interventions and complications were recorded for each patient.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Forty three cases of diaphyseal non-union were identified from 2008 to 2019. Only the presence of peripheral vascular disease demonstrated a statistically significant association with the development of non-union. In 44% of cases, more than one additional operation was required to achieve union. Successful union was achieved in 90% of cases with 74% of patients returning to full pre-injury function without complication.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Management of non-union is a complex problem which requires a multifaceted and bespoke approach. We have included an algorithm to help guide decision making based on our institutional experience. A satisfactory result is achievable in the majority of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13338,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01235-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Non-union is a significant complication following open diaphyseal tibia fractures. Management can be complex and unpredictable. Several principles must be addressed often in combination to achieve union. The aim of this study is to report on the characteristics, management and eventual outcome of non-united open tibial fractures over a 12-year period from a level I trauma centre.

Methods

This is a retrospective observational study of all adults (age 18 years and older) presenting to a level 1 trauma centre with a diaphyseal tibia fracture. Non-union was diagnosed using the standard FDA definition of incomplete union by 9 months or no progress to union in the preceding 3 months. Injury and patient demographics in addition to all interventions and complications were recorded for each patient.

Results

Forty three cases of diaphyseal non-union were identified from 2008 to 2019. Only the presence of peripheral vascular disease demonstrated a statistically significant association with the development of non-union. In 44% of cases, more than one additional operation was required to achieve union. Successful union was achieved in 90% of cases with 74% of patients returning to full pre-injury function without complication.

Conclusion

Management of non-union is a complex problem which requires a multifaceted and bespoke approach. We have included an algorithm to help guide decision making based on our institutional experience. A satisfactory result is achievable in the majority of patients.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开放性骨折后胫骨骺端未愈合的治疗:关于特征和疗效的回顾性观察研究
目的 非愈合是开放性胫骨骨骺骨折后的一个重要并发症。处理方法可能复杂且难以预测。要实现骨折的愈合,必须结合多种原则。本研究旨在报告一家一级创伤中心 12 年来开放性胫骨骨折不愈合的特点、处理方法和最终结果。方法这是一项回顾性观察研究,研究对象是所有因胫骨骺骨折到一级创伤中心就诊的成年人(18 岁及以上)。根据 FDA 的标准定义,9 个月内未完全愈合或前 3 个月内未达到愈合,即可诊断为非愈合。除了所有干预措施和并发症外,还记录了每位患者的伤情和患者人口统计学特征。结果从2008年到2019年,共发现了43例胫骨骺不愈合病例。只有存在外周血管疾病的病例与非骨骺形成有显著的统计学关联。在44%的病例中,需要进行一次以上的额外手术才能实现连接。90%的病例成功实现了骨结合,74%的患者在无并发症的情况下恢复了受伤前的全部功能。我们根据本机构的经验制定了一套算法,用于指导决策。大多数患者都能获得满意的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: IJO welcomes articles that contribute to Orthopaedic knowledge from India and overseas. We publish articles dealing with clinical orthopaedics and basic research in orthopaedic surgery. Articles are accepted only for exclusive publication in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. Previously published articles, articles which are in peer-reviewed electronic publications in other journals, are not accepted by the Journal. Published articles and illustrations become the property of the Journal. The copyright remains with the journal. Studies must be carried out in accordance with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.
期刊最新文献
Technology Update in Management of Multi-Ligament Knee Injuries. From the Guest Editors: Unraveling the Complexities of Multiligament Knee Injuries-A Global Endeavor. Strategies for Preventing Tunnel Convergence in Multiligament Knee Injury Reconstructions. Adjustable Loop Fixation in Multi-ligament Knee Injuries: A Technical Note. Clinical Results of Isolated MCL Grade III Injury in Acute and Chronic Setting: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1