Stroke Prevention With Prophylactic Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Cardiac Surgery Patients Without Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Propensity-Score Studies.

IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1161/circinterventions.124.014296
Massimo Baudo,Serge Sicouri,Yoshiyuki Yamashita,Mikiko Senzai,Patrick M McCarthy,Marc W Gerdisch,Richard P Whitlock,Basel Ramlawi
{"title":"Stroke Prevention With Prophylactic Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Cardiac Surgery Patients Without Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Propensity-Score Studies.","authors":"Massimo Baudo,Serge Sicouri,Yoshiyuki Yamashita,Mikiko Senzai,Patrick M McCarthy,Marc W Gerdisch,Richard P Whitlock,Basel Ramlawi","doi":"10.1161/circinterventions.124.014296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nThe role of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) in patients without previous atrial fibrillation (AF) is not established. This meta-analysis was conducted on patients with normal sinus rhythm who underwent cardiac surgery, with and without concomitant LAAO, to evaluate its effect on the incidence of cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs).\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA systematic review was conducted from inception until December 2023 for randomized and propensity-score studies comparing CVA in patients without AF undergoing cardiac surgery with or without LAAO.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nSix studies met our inclusion criteria with a total of 4130 patients: 2146 in the LAAO group and 1984 in the no-LAAO group. The risk ratio of postoperative AF was 1.05 (95% CI, 0.86-1.28); P=0.628. The CVA rates at 5 years were 6.8±1.0% in the no-LAAO group and 4.3±0.8% in the LAAO group (log-rank P=0.021). The Cox regression analysis for CVA in patients undergoing LAAO reported a hazard ratio of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.45-0.94); P=0.022. Landmark analysis at 4 years highlighted a significant difference in overall survival between no-LAAO and LAAO groups, 86±12.2% versus 89.6±11.0%; P=0.041.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nIn this meta-analysis of patients without previous AF undergoing cardiac surgery, LAAO was associated with a decreased risk of CVA, no difference in the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation, and a significant overall survival benefit at a 4-year landmark analysis. Although these findings support LAAO, the randomized LeAAPS trial (Left Atrial Appendage Exclusion for Prophylactic Stroke Reduction Trial), LAA-CLOSURE trial (A Randomized Prospective Multicenter Trial for Stroke Prevention by Prophylactic Surgical Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage in Patients Undergoing Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Surgery), and LAACS-2 trial (Left Atrial Appendage Closure by Surgery-2) will help define the effectiveness of LAAO in patients undergoing cardiac surgery who have risk factors for AF and CVA.\r\n\r\nREGISTRATION\r\nURL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/; Unique identifier: CRD42024496366.","PeriodicalId":10330,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":"67 1","pages":"e014296"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.124.014296","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND The role of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) in patients without previous atrial fibrillation (AF) is not established. This meta-analysis was conducted on patients with normal sinus rhythm who underwent cardiac surgery, with and without concomitant LAAO, to evaluate its effect on the incidence of cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs). METHODS A systematic review was conducted from inception until December 2023 for randomized and propensity-score studies comparing CVA in patients without AF undergoing cardiac surgery with or without LAAO. RESULTS Six studies met our inclusion criteria with a total of 4130 patients: 2146 in the LAAO group and 1984 in the no-LAAO group. The risk ratio of postoperative AF was 1.05 (95% CI, 0.86-1.28); P=0.628. The CVA rates at 5 years were 6.8±1.0% in the no-LAAO group and 4.3±0.8% in the LAAO group (log-rank P=0.021). The Cox regression analysis for CVA in patients undergoing LAAO reported a hazard ratio of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.45-0.94); P=0.022. Landmark analysis at 4 years highlighted a significant difference in overall survival between no-LAAO and LAAO groups, 86±12.2% versus 89.6±11.0%; P=0.041. CONCLUSIONS In this meta-analysis of patients without previous AF undergoing cardiac surgery, LAAO was associated with a decreased risk of CVA, no difference in the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation, and a significant overall survival benefit at a 4-year landmark analysis. Although these findings support LAAO, the randomized LeAAPS trial (Left Atrial Appendage Exclusion for Prophylactic Stroke Reduction Trial), LAA-CLOSURE trial (A Randomized Prospective Multicenter Trial for Stroke Prevention by Prophylactic Surgical Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage in Patients Undergoing Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Surgery), and LAACS-2 trial (Left Atrial Appendage Closure by Surgery-2) will help define the effectiveness of LAAO in patients undergoing cardiac surgery who have risk factors for AF and CVA. REGISTRATION URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/; Unique identifier: CRD42024496366.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无心房颤动的心脏手术患者预防性左心房阑尾闭塞预防中风:随机研究和倾向分数研究的 Meta 分析。
背景左心房阑尾闭塞术(LAAO)在既往无房颤(AF)患者中的作用尚未确定。本荟萃分析以接受心脏手术的正常窦性心律患者为研究对象,评估其对脑血管意外(CVA)发生率的影响。方法从开始到 2023 年 12 月,我们进行了系统性回顾,对接受心脏手术的无房颤患者进行了随机研究和倾向分数研究,比较了有无 LAAO 患者的 CVA:其中 LAAO 组 2146 例,无 LAAO 组 1984 例。术后房颤的风险比为 1.05(95% CI,0.86-1.28);P=0.628。无 LAAO 组 5 年的 CVA 发生率为 6.8±1.0%,LAAO 组为 4.3±0.8%(对数秩 P=0.021)。Cox回归分析显示,接受LAAO治疗的患者发生CVA的危险比为0.65(95% CI,0.45-0.94);P=0.022。结论 在这项对既往无房颤的心脏手术患者进行的荟萃分析中,LAAO与CVA风险降低相关,术后房颤发生率无差异,且在4年的标志性分析中总体生存显著获益。尽管这些研究结果支持 LAAO,但随机进行的 LeAAPS 试验(预防性卒中减少左心房阑尾切除试验)、LAA-CLOSURE 试验(在接受生物修复主动脉瓣手术的患者中通过预防性手术关闭左心房阑尾预防卒中的随机前瞻性多中心试验)和 LAACS-2 试验(左心房阑尾切除术预防性卒中的随机前瞻性多中心试验)也支持 LAAO、和 LAACS-2 试验(Left Atrial Appendage Closure by Surgery-2)将有助于确定 LAAO 对具有房颤和脑卒中风险因素的心脏手术患者的有效性。注册网址:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/;唯一标识符:CRD42024496366。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
221
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, an American Heart Association journal, focuses on interventional techniques pertaining to coronary artery disease, structural heart disease, and vascular disease, with priority placed on original research and on randomized trials and large registry studies. In addition, pharmacological, diagnostic, and pathophysiological aspects of interventional cardiology are given special attention in this online-only journal.
期刊最新文献
CTCA Prior to Invasive Coronary Angiography in Patients With Previous Bypass Surgery: Patient-Related Outcomes, Imaging Resource Utilization, and Cardiac Events at 3 Years From the BYPASS-CTCA Trial. Invasive or CT Angiography: Alternative or Complementary Imaging Tools After CABG? Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With the Evolut FX Self-Expanding Versus SAPIEN 3 Ultra Resilia Balloon-Expandable Valves. Transcatheter Interventions in Adults With Fontan Palliation. Contemporary Outcomes of TAVR Using a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Patients With Severe Mitral Stenosis: Insights From the Transcatheter Valve Therapies Registry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1