LCA and energy efficiency in buildings: mapping more than twenty years of research

F. Asdrubali, A. Fronzetti Colladon, L. Segneri, D. M. Gandola
{"title":"LCA and energy efficiency in buildings: mapping more than twenty years of research","authors":"F. Asdrubali, A. Fronzetti Colladon, L. Segneri, D. M. Gandola","doi":"arxiv-2409.00065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is being conducted in various\nsectors, from analyzing building materials and components to comprehensive\nevaluations of entire structures. However, reviews of the existing literature\nhave been unable to provide a comprehensive overview of research in this field,\nleaving scholars without a definitive guideline for future investigations. This\npaper aims to fill this gap, mapping more than twenty years of research. Using\nan innovative methodology that combines social network analysis and text\nmining, the paper examined 8024 scientific abstracts. The authors identified\nseven key thematic groups, building and sustainability clusters (BSCs). To\nassess their significance in the broader discourse on building and\nsustainability, the semantic brand score (SBS) indicator was applied.\nAdditionally, building and sustainability trends were tracked, focusing on the\nLCA concept. The major research topics mainly relate to building materials and\nenergy efficiency. In addition to presenting an innovative approach to\nreviewing extensive literature domains, the article also provides insights into\nemerging and underdeveloped themes, outlining crucial future research\ndirections.","PeriodicalId":501285,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.00065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is being conducted in various sectors, from analyzing building materials and components to comprehensive evaluations of entire structures. However, reviews of the existing literature have been unable to provide a comprehensive overview of research in this field, leaving scholars without a definitive guideline for future investigations. This paper aims to fill this gap, mapping more than twenty years of research. Using an innovative methodology that combines social network analysis and text mining, the paper examined 8024 scientific abstracts. The authors identified seven key thematic groups, building and sustainability clusters (BSCs). To assess their significance in the broader discourse on building and sustainability, the semantic brand score (SBS) indicator was applied. Additionally, building and sustainability trends were tracked, focusing on the LCA concept. The major research topics mainly relate to building materials and energy efficiency. In addition to presenting an innovative approach to reviewing extensive literature domains, the article also provides insights into emerging and underdeveloped themes, outlining crucial future research directions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生命周期评估与建筑能效:二十多年的研究图谱
各行各业都在开展生命周期评估(LCA)研究,从分析建筑材料和组件到对整个结构进行综合评估。然而,对现有文献的综述无法全面概述该领域的研究,使学者们对未来的研究缺乏明确的指导。本文旨在填补这一空白,对二十多年来的研究进行梳理。本文采用创新方法,结合社交网络分析和文本挖掘,研究了 8024 篇科学文摘。作者确定了七个关键主题组,即建筑与可持续发展集群(BSCs)。为了评估它们在更广泛的建筑与可持续发展讨论中的重要性,作者采用了语义品牌得分(SBS)指标。此外,作者还跟踪了建筑与可持续发展的趋势,重点关注了LCA概念。主要研究课题主要涉及建筑材料和能源效率。除了提出一种创新的方法来审查广泛的文献领域外,文章还对新出现的和未充分开发的主题提出了见解,并概述了未来的重要研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Publishing Instincts: An Exploration-Exploitation Framework for Studying Academic Publishing Behavior and "Home Venues" Research Citations Building Trust in Wikipedia Evaluating the Linguistic Coverage of OpenAlex: An Assessment of Metadata Accuracy and Completeness Towards understanding evolution of science through language model series Ensuring Adherence to Standards in Experiment-Related Metadata Entered Via Spreadsheets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1