Can we measure the impact of a database?

Peter Buneman, Dennis Dosso, Matteo Lissandrini, Gianmaria Silvello, He Sun
{"title":"Can we measure the impact of a database?","authors":"Peter Buneman, Dennis Dosso, Matteo Lissandrini, Gianmaria Silvello, He Sun","doi":"arxiv-2408.09842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In disseminating scientific and statistical data, on-line databases have\nalmost completely replaced traditional paper-based media such as journals and\nreference works. Given this, can we measure the impact of a database in the\nsame way that we measure an author's or journal's impact? To do this, we need\nsomehow to represent a database as a set of publications, and databases\ntypically allow a large number of possible decompositions into parts, any of\nwhich could be treated as a publication. We show that the definition of the h-index naturally extends to hierarchies,\nso that if a database admits some kind of hierarchical interpretation we can\nuse this as one measure of the importance of a database; moreover, this can be\ncomputed as efficiently as one can compute the normal h-index. This also gives\nus a decomposition of the database that might be used for other purposes such\nas giving credit to the curators or contributors to the database. We illustrate\nthe process by analyzing three widely used databases.","PeriodicalId":501285,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.09842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In disseminating scientific and statistical data, on-line databases have almost completely replaced traditional paper-based media such as journals and reference works. Given this, can we measure the impact of a database in the same way that we measure an author's or journal's impact? To do this, we need somehow to represent a database as a set of publications, and databases typically allow a large number of possible decompositions into parts, any of which could be treated as a publication. We show that the definition of the h-index naturally extends to hierarchies, so that if a database admits some kind of hierarchical interpretation we can use this as one measure of the importance of a database; moreover, this can be computed as efficiently as one can compute the normal h-index. This also gives us a decomposition of the database that might be used for other purposes such as giving credit to the curators or contributors to the database. We illustrate the process by analyzing three widely used databases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们能否衡量数据库的影响?
在传播科学和统计数据方面,在线数据库几乎完全取代了期刊和参考文献等传统纸质媒体。既然如此,我们能否像衡量作者或期刊的影响力那样来衡量数据库的影响力呢?要做到这一点,我们需要以某种方式将数据库表示为一组出版物,而数据库通常允许大量可能的分解,其中任何一部分都可以被视为出版物。我们证明了 h 指数的定义可以自然地扩展到层次结构,因此,如果数据库允许某种层次结构的解释,我们就可以用它来衡量数据库的重要性;此外,它的计算效率与计算普通的 h 指数一样高。这也为我们提供了数据库的分解方法,可用于其他目的,例如为数据库的策划者或贡献者提供荣誉。我们通过分析三个广泛使用的数据库来说明这一过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Publishing Instincts: An Exploration-Exploitation Framework for Studying Academic Publishing Behavior and "Home Venues" Research Citations Building Trust in Wikipedia Evaluating the Linguistic Coverage of OpenAlex: An Assessment of Metadata Accuracy and Completeness Towards understanding evolution of science through language model series Ensuring Adherence to Standards in Experiment-Related Metadata Entered Via Spreadsheets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1