Germany’s positioning in the triangular relations with Russia and the US: towards a (new) European security order?

IF 1.4 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS International Politics Pub Date : 2024-08-24 DOI:10.1057/s41311-024-00620-6
Nele Marianne Ewers-Peters
{"title":"Germany’s positioning in the triangular relations with Russia and the US: towards a (new) European security order?","authors":"Nele Marianne Ewers-Peters","doi":"10.1057/s41311-024-00620-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Growing great power competition, a changing security environment and the acclaimed de-institutionalisation of security policy in the twenty-first century demand adaptations in national security approaches and institutional settings. States have benefitted differently from the post-Cold War European security order. While Germany presents itself as a prime beneficiary from Europe’s multilateral structures, the US has sought to shift its focus away from Europe, and Russia’s foreign policy has become increasingly aggressive, eventually culminating in the return of war to Europe. Such developments lead to new transformations and fundamental re-arrangements of the present security order that require states to rethink their national foreign and security policies and relationships. This article examines the relations between Germany, Russia and the US using the analytical concept of triangular relations. Used as an analytical tool, the examination of the Germany–Russia–US triangular relationship helps to investigate and trace how we got to the contemporary European security order.</p>","PeriodicalId":46593,"journal":{"name":"International Politics","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-024-00620-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Growing great power competition, a changing security environment and the acclaimed de-institutionalisation of security policy in the twenty-first century demand adaptations in national security approaches and institutional settings. States have benefitted differently from the post-Cold War European security order. While Germany presents itself as a prime beneficiary from Europe’s multilateral structures, the US has sought to shift its focus away from Europe, and Russia’s foreign policy has become increasingly aggressive, eventually culminating in the return of war to Europe. Such developments lead to new transformations and fundamental re-arrangements of the present security order that require states to rethink their national foreign and security policies and relationships. This article examines the relations between Germany, Russia and the US using the analytical concept of triangular relations. Used as an analytical tool, the examination of the Germany–Russia–US triangular relationship helps to investigate and trace how we got to the contemporary European security order.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德国在与俄罗斯和美国三角关系中的定位:走向(新的)欧洲安全秩序?
二十一世纪,日益激烈的大国竞争、不断变化的安全环境以及广受赞誉的安全政策非制度化,都要求对国家安全方法和机构设置进行调整。各国从冷战后欧洲安全秩序中受益的情况各不相同。德国是欧洲多边结构的主要受益者,而美国则试图将重心从欧洲转移开,俄罗斯的外交政策也变得越来越咄咄逼人,最终导致欧洲战火重燃。这些事态发展导致了新的变革,从根本上重新安排了当前的安全秩序,要求各国重新思考本国的外交和安全政策及关系。本文使用三角关系的分析概念来研究德国、俄罗斯和美国之间的关系。作为一种分析工具,对德俄美三角关系的研究有助于调查和追溯我们是如何形成当代欧洲安全秩序的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: International Politics?is a leading peer reviewed journal dedicated to transnational issues and global problems. It subscribes to no political or methodological identity and welcomes any appropriate contributions designed to communicate findings and enhance dialogue.International Politics?defines itself as critical in character truly international in scope and totally engaged with the central issues facing the world today. Taking as its point of departure the simple but essential notion that no one approach has all the answers it aims to provide a global forum for a rapidly expanding community of scholars from across the range of academic disciplines.International Politics?aims to encourage debate controversy and reflection. Topics addressed within the journal include:Rethinking the Clash of CivilizationsMyths of WestphaliaHolocaust and ChinaLeo Strauss and the Cold WarJustin Rosenberg and Globalisation TheoryPutin and the WestThe USA Post-BushCan China Rise Peacefully Just WarsCuba Castro and AfterGramsci and IRIs America in Decline。
期刊最新文献
Conceptualizing religion and religious ideology in political science research: what is in a name and what description can do Adam Watson and international relations: a contemporary reassessment—introduction Conspiratorial imaginaries of the right: a commentary on capital, race and space by Richard Saull From mandate to actor: the case of the International Law Commission EU–Russia energy cooperation: implications for Lithuania’s energy security
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1