Effectiveness of β-blockers in improving 28-day mortality in septic shock: insights from subgroup analysis and retrospective observational study

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2024.1438798
Ling Zhang, Yue Yu, Tong Wu, Tingting Pan, Hongping Qu, Jingyi Wu, Ruoming Tan
{"title":"Effectiveness of β-blockers in improving 28-day mortality in septic shock: insights from subgroup analysis and retrospective observational study","authors":"Ling Zhang, Yue Yu, Tong Wu, Tingting Pan, Hongping Qu, Jingyi Wu, Ruoming Tan","doi":"10.3389/fcvm.2024.1438798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundIn recent years, septic shock remains a common fatal disease in the intensive care unit (ICU). After sufficient fluid resuscitation, some patients still experience tachycardia, which may lead to adverse effects on cardiac function. However, the use of β-blockers in the treatment of septic shock remains controversial. Thus, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of β-blockers in the treatment of patients with septic shock and explore the most appropriate patient subgroups for this treatment.MethodsThis retrospective observational study enrolled septic shock patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV and used propensity score matching (PSM) to balance some baseline differences between patients with and without β-blockers treatment. The primary outcome was the 28-day mortality. Length of stay (LOS) in the ICU and hospital, and the degree of support for organs such as circulatory, respiratory and renal systems were also assessed. Subgroup analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed to determine the relationship between β-blockers therapy and 28-day mortality in different patient groups.ResultsA total of 4,860 septic shock patients were enrolled in this study and 619 pairs were finally matched after PSM. Our analysis revealed that β-blocker therapy was associated with a significant improvement in 28-day mortality (21.5% vs. 27.1%; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.020) and led to a prolonged LOS in both the ICU and hospital. Subgroup analysis indicated that there was an interaction between cardiovascular diseases and β-blocker therapy in patients with septic shock. Patients with pre-existing heart disease or atrial arrhythmias were more likely to derive benefits from β-blocker treatment.ConclusionWe found β-blockers therapy was effective to improve 28-day mortality in patients with septic shock. Patients in the subgroup with cardiovascular diseases were more likely to benefit from β-blockers in mortality.","PeriodicalId":12414,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1438798","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundIn recent years, septic shock remains a common fatal disease in the intensive care unit (ICU). After sufficient fluid resuscitation, some patients still experience tachycardia, which may lead to adverse effects on cardiac function. However, the use of β-blockers in the treatment of septic shock remains controversial. Thus, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of β-blockers in the treatment of patients with septic shock and explore the most appropriate patient subgroups for this treatment.MethodsThis retrospective observational study enrolled septic shock patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV and used propensity score matching (PSM) to balance some baseline differences between patients with and without β-blockers treatment. The primary outcome was the 28-day mortality. Length of stay (LOS) in the ICU and hospital, and the degree of support for organs such as circulatory, respiratory and renal systems were also assessed. Subgroup analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed to determine the relationship between β-blockers therapy and 28-day mortality in different patient groups.ResultsA total of 4,860 septic shock patients were enrolled in this study and 619 pairs were finally matched after PSM. Our analysis revealed that β-blocker therapy was associated with a significant improvement in 28-day mortality (21.5% vs. 27.1%; P = 0.020) and led to a prolonged LOS in both the ICU and hospital. Subgroup analysis indicated that there was an interaction between cardiovascular diseases and β-blocker therapy in patients with septic shock. Patients with pre-existing heart disease or atrial arrhythmias were more likely to derive benefits from β-blocker treatment.ConclusionWe found β-blockers therapy was effective to improve 28-day mortality in patients with septic shock. Patients in the subgroup with cardiovascular diseases were more likely to benefit from β-blockers in mortality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
β-受体阻滞剂在改善脓毒性休克 28 天死亡率方面的效果:亚组分析和回顾性观察研究的启示
背景近年来,脓毒性休克仍是重症监护室(ICU)中常见的致命疾病。经过充分的液体复苏后,一些患者仍会出现心动过速,这可能会对心脏功能造成不良影响。然而,β-受体阻滞剂在脓毒性休克治疗中的应用仍存在争议。因此,本研究旨在评估β-受体阻滞剂在治疗脓毒性休克患者中的疗效,并探索最适合接受这种治疗的患者亚组。这项回顾性观察研究从重症监护医学信息市场(MIMIC)-IV 中招募了脓毒性休克患者,并使用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来平衡接受和未接受β-受体阻滞剂治疗的患者之间的一些基线差异。主要结果是 28 天死亡率。此外,还评估了重症监护室和医院的住院时间(LOS)以及循环、呼吸和肾脏系统等器官的支持程度。我们进行了亚组分析和多变量逻辑回归,以确定不同患者组中 β 受体阻滞剂治疗与 28 天死亡率之间的关系。我们的分析显示,β-受体阻滞剂治疗可显著改善 28 天死亡率(21.5% 对 27.1%;P = 0.020),并延长重症监护室和医院的住院时间。亚组分析表明,脓毒性休克患者的心血管疾病与β受体阻滞剂治疗之间存在相互作用。结论我们发现β-受体阻滞剂治疗能有效改善脓毒性休克患者的28天死亡率。患有心血管疾病的亚组患者更有可能从β-受体阻滞剂治疗中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
3529
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers? Which frontiers? Where exactly are the frontiers of cardiovascular medicine? And who should be defining these frontiers? At Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine we believe it is worth being curious to foresee and explore beyond the current frontiers. In other words, we would like, through the articles published by our community journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, to anticipate the future of cardiovascular medicine, and thus better prevent cardiovascular disorders and improve therapeutic options and outcomes of our patients.
期刊最新文献
Pediatric RVOT reconstruction with ePTFE trileaflet valved conduits: a dual-center Chinese study First manifestation of cardiovascular disease according to age and sex in a Mediterranean country Outcomes after noncardiac surgery in patients with left ventricular assist devices: a systematic review A comparative study of femoral artery and combined femoral and axillary artery cannulation in veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients Serum insulin-like growth factor-1 as a potential prognostic biomarker for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1