Diagnostic value of artificial intelligence-assisted CTA for the assessment of atherosclerosis plaque: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2024.1398963
Pingping Jie, Min Fan, Haiyi Zhang, Oucheng Wang, Jun Lv, Yingchun Liu, Chunyin Zhang, Yong Liu, Jie Zhao
{"title":"Diagnostic value of artificial intelligence-assisted CTA for the assessment of atherosclerosis plaque: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Pingping Jie, Min Fan, Haiyi Zhang, Oucheng Wang, Jun Lv, Yingchun Liu, Chunyin Zhang, Yong Liu, Jie Zhao","doi":"10.3389/fcvm.2024.1398963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) has increasingly been applied to computed tomography angiography (CTA) images to aid in the assessment of atherosclerotic plaque. Our aim was to explore the diagnostic accuracy of AI-assisted CTA for plaque diagnosis and classification through a systematic review and meta-analysis.MethodsA systematic literature review was performed by searching PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library according to PRISMA guidelines. Original studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of radiomics, machine-learning, or deep-learning techniques applied to CTA images for detecting stenosis, calcification, or plaque vulnerability were included. The quality and risk of bias of the included studies were evaluated using the QUADAS-2 tool. The meta-analysis was conducted using STATA software (version 17.0) to pool sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) to determine the overall diagnostic performance.ResultsA total of 11 studies comprising 1,484 patients were included. There was low risk of bias and substantial heterogeneity. The overall pooled AUROC for atherosclerotic plaque assessment was 0.96 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94–0.97] across 21 trials. Of these, for ≥50% stenosis detection, the AUROC was 0.95 (95% CI 0.93–0.96) in five studies. For identifying ≥70% stenosis, the AUROC was 0.96 (95% CI 0.94–0.97) in six studies. For calcium detection, the AUROC was 0.92 (95% CI 0.90–0.94) in six studies.ConclusionOur meta-analysis demonstrates that AI-assisted CTA has high diagnostic accuracy for detecting stenosis and characterizing plaque composition, with optimal performance in detecting ≥70% stenosis.Systematic Review Registration<jats:uri>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/</jats:uri>, PROSPERO, identifier (CRD42023431410).","PeriodicalId":12414,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1398963","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) has increasingly been applied to computed tomography angiography (CTA) images to aid in the assessment of atherosclerotic plaque. Our aim was to explore the diagnostic accuracy of AI-assisted CTA for plaque diagnosis and classification through a systematic review and meta-analysis.MethodsA systematic literature review was performed by searching PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library according to PRISMA guidelines. Original studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of radiomics, machine-learning, or deep-learning techniques applied to CTA images for detecting stenosis, calcification, or plaque vulnerability were included. The quality and risk of bias of the included studies were evaluated using the QUADAS-2 tool. The meta-analysis was conducted using STATA software (version 17.0) to pool sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) to determine the overall diagnostic performance.ResultsA total of 11 studies comprising 1,484 patients were included. There was low risk of bias and substantial heterogeneity. The overall pooled AUROC for atherosclerotic plaque assessment was 0.96 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94–0.97] across 21 trials. Of these, for ≥50% stenosis detection, the AUROC was 0.95 (95% CI 0.93–0.96) in five studies. For identifying ≥70% stenosis, the AUROC was 0.96 (95% CI 0.94–0.97) in six studies. For calcium detection, the AUROC was 0.92 (95% CI 0.90–0.94) in six studies.ConclusionOur meta-analysis demonstrates that AI-assisted CTA has high diagnostic accuracy for detecting stenosis and characterizing plaque composition, with optimal performance in detecting ≥70% stenosis.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/, PROSPERO, identifier (CRD42023431410).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能辅助 CTA 在评估动脉粥样硬化斑块方面的诊断价值:系统综述和荟萃分析
背景人工智能(AI)越来越多地应用于计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)图像,以帮助评估动脉粥样硬化斑块。我们的目的是通过系统综述和荟萃分析,探讨人工智能辅助 CTA 对斑块诊断和分类的诊断准确性。方法根据 PRISMA 指南检索 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆,进行系统文献综述。纳入的原始研究评估了应用于 CTA 图像的放射组学、机器学习或深度学习技术在检测狭窄、钙化或斑块脆弱性方面的诊断准确性。使用 QUADAS-2 工具对纳入研究的质量和偏倚风险进行了评估。使用 STATA 软件(17.0 版)进行荟萃分析,汇总灵敏度、特异性和接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC),以确定总体诊断性能。偏倚风险较低,异质性较大。在21项试验中,动脉粥样硬化斑块评估的总合AUROC为0.96[95%置信区间(CI)0.94-0.97]。其中,对于≥50%狭窄的检测,5项研究的AUROC为0.95(95% CI 0.93-0.96)。在识别≥70%狭窄方面,6项研究的AUROC为0.96(95% CI 0.94-0.97)。结论我们的荟萃分析表明,AI辅助CTA在检测狭窄和描述斑块组成方面具有很高的诊断准确性,在检测≥70%的狭窄方面具有最佳性能。系统综述注册https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/,PROSPERO,标识符(CRD42023431410)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
3529
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers? Which frontiers? Where exactly are the frontiers of cardiovascular medicine? And who should be defining these frontiers? At Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine we believe it is worth being curious to foresee and explore beyond the current frontiers. In other words, we would like, through the articles published by our community journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, to anticipate the future of cardiovascular medicine, and thus better prevent cardiovascular disorders and improve therapeutic options and outcomes of our patients.
期刊最新文献
Pediatric RVOT reconstruction with ePTFE trileaflet valved conduits: a dual-center Chinese study First manifestation of cardiovascular disease according to age and sex in a Mediterranean country Outcomes after noncardiac surgery in patients with left ventricular assist devices: a systematic review A comparative study of femoral artery and combined femoral and axillary artery cannulation in veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients Serum insulin-like growth factor-1 as a potential prognostic biomarker for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1