Prospective Monitoring of New Drugs in Older Adults with and without Frailty: Near-Real-Time Assessment of Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Anticoagulants in Medicare Data

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Drugs & Aging Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1007/s40266-024-01142-9
Darae Ko, Kueiyu Joshua Lin, Su Been Lee, Zhigang Lu, Susan Cheng, Sachin J. Shah, Robert J. Glynn, Dae Hyun Kim
{"title":"Prospective Monitoring of New Drugs in Older Adults with and without Frailty: Near-Real-Time Assessment of Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Anticoagulants in Medicare Data","authors":"Darae Ko, Kueiyu Joshua Lin, Su Been Lee, Zhigang Lu, Susan Cheng, Sachin J. Shah, Robert J. Glynn, Dae Hyun Kim","doi":"10.1007/s40266-024-01142-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background and Objective</h3><p>Prospective sequential analyses after a new drug approval allow proactive surveillance of new drugs. In the current study, we demonstrate feasibility of frailty-specific sequential analyses for dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban versus warfarin.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We partitioned Medicare data from 2011 to 2020 into datasets based on calendar year following the date of drug approval. Each calendar year of data was added sequentially for analysis. We used a new-user, active comparative design by comparing the initiators of dabigatran versus warfarin, rivaroxaban versus warfarin, and apixaban versus warfarin. Patients aged ≥ 65 years with atrial fibrillation without contraindication to the anticoagulants were included. Claims-based frailty index ≥ 0.25 was used to define frailty. The initiators of each direct oral anticoagulant were propensity-score matched to the initiators of warfarin within each frailty status. The effectiveness outcome was ischemic stroke or systemic thromboembolism, and the safety outcome was major bleeding. For each calendar year, we estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from Cox proportional hazards models using all data available up to that year.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>As an example of the results, in the 2020 dataset, compared with warfarin, apixaban was associated with a reduced risk of ischemic stroke or systemic thromboembolism (frail: HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.63–0.85; non-frail: HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.59–0.72) and major bleeding (frail: HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.57–0.69; non-frail: HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.56–0.63) in both frail and non-frail patients. We found evidence for apixaban’s effectiveness and safety within 1–2 years after the drug approval in frail older patients.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Our frailty-specific sequential analyses can be applied to future near-real-time monitoring of newly approved drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-024-01142-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objective

Prospective sequential analyses after a new drug approval allow proactive surveillance of new drugs. In the current study, we demonstrate feasibility of frailty-specific sequential analyses for dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban versus warfarin.

Methods

We partitioned Medicare data from 2011 to 2020 into datasets based on calendar year following the date of drug approval. Each calendar year of data was added sequentially for analysis. We used a new-user, active comparative design by comparing the initiators of dabigatran versus warfarin, rivaroxaban versus warfarin, and apixaban versus warfarin. Patients aged ≥ 65 years with atrial fibrillation without contraindication to the anticoagulants were included. Claims-based frailty index ≥ 0.25 was used to define frailty. The initiators of each direct oral anticoagulant were propensity-score matched to the initiators of warfarin within each frailty status. The effectiveness outcome was ischemic stroke or systemic thromboembolism, and the safety outcome was major bleeding. For each calendar year, we estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from Cox proportional hazards models using all data available up to that year.

Results

As an example of the results, in the 2020 dataset, compared with warfarin, apixaban was associated with a reduced risk of ischemic stroke or systemic thromboembolism (frail: HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.63–0.85; non-frail: HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.59–0.72) and major bleeding (frail: HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.57–0.69; non-frail: HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.56–0.63) in both frail and non-frail patients. We found evidence for apixaban’s effectiveness and safety within 1–2 years after the drug approval in frail older patients.

Conclusion

Our frailty-specific sequential analyses can be applied to future near-real-time monitoring of newly approved drugs.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前瞻性监测有体弱和无体弱老年人的新药:医疗保险数据中口服抗凝药有效性和安全性的近实时评估
背景和目的在新药批准后进行前瞻性序贯分析可以对新药进行前瞻性监测。在本研究中,我们展示了针对达比加群、利伐沙班和阿哌沙班与华法林进行虚弱特异性序贯分析的可行性。方法我们将 2011 年至 2020 年的医疗保险数据按药物批准日期后的日历年划分为数据集。每个日历年的数据均按顺序添加以进行分析。通过比较达比加群与华法林、利伐沙班与华法林、阿哌沙班与华法林的启动者,我们采用了新用户主动比较设计。纳入的患者年龄≥ 65 岁,患有心房颤动且无抗凝剂禁忌症。采用基于索赔的虚弱指数≥ 0.25 来定义虚弱。在每种虚弱状态下,每种直接口服抗凝药的启动者都与华法林的启动者进行了倾向分数匹配。有效性结局为缺血性中风或全身性血栓栓塞,安全性结局为大出血。对于每个日历年,我们使用截至该年的所有可用数据,通过 Cox 比例危险模型估算出危险比 (HR) 和 95% 置信区间 (CI)。结果举例来说,在 2020 年的数据集中,与华法林相比,阿哌沙班与缺血性中风或全身性血栓栓塞风险降低相关(虚弱:HR 0.73,95% CI 0.63-0.85;非体弱:HR 0.65,95% CI 0.59-0.72)和大出血(体弱:HR 0.63,95% CI 0.57-0.69;非体弱:HR 0.59,95% CI 0.56-0.63)。我们发现了阿哌沙班在新药批准后 1-2 年内对老年体弱患者的有效性和安全性的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drugs & Aging
Drugs & Aging 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs & Aging delivers essential information on the most important aspects of drug therapy to professionals involved in the care of the elderly. The journal addresses in a timely way the major issues relating to drug therapy in older adults including: the management of specific diseases, particularly those associated with aging, age-related physiological changes impacting drug therapy, drug utilization and prescribing in the elderly, polypharmacy and drug interactions.
期刊最新文献
Differences in Pharmacological Treatment of Heart Failure Among Persons with or without Major Cognitive Disorder: A Cross-Sectional Study Based on National Registries in Sweden. Minimising Harm and Managing Pain: Deprescribing Opioids in Older Adults. Pharmacological Pain Treatment in Older Persons. Pilocarpine in the Treatment of Presbyopia: Progress, Issues, and Future Prospects. Efficacy and Safety of Fixed-Dose Combinations for Pain in Older Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1