Rajkumar Hajra, Bruce Tsatnam Tsurutani, Gurbax Singh Lakhina, Quanming Lu, Aimin Du
{"title":"Interplanetary Causes and Impacts of the 2024 May Superstorm on the Geosphere: An Overview","authors":"Rajkumar Hajra, Bruce Tsatnam Tsurutani, Gurbax Singh Lakhina, Quanming Lu, Aimin Du","doi":"arxiv-2408.14799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent superstorm of 2024 May 10-11 is the second largest geomagnetic\nstorm in the space age and the only one that has simultaneous interplanetary\ndata (there were no interplanetary data for the 1989 March storm). The May\nsuperstorm was characterized by a sudden impulse (SI+) amplitude of +88 nT,\nfollowed by a three-step storm main phase development which had a total\nduration of ~9 hr. The cause of the first storm main phase with a peak SYM-H\nintensity of -183 nT was a fast forward interplanetary shock (magnetosonic Mach\nnumber Mms ~7.2) and an interplanetary sheath with southward interplanetary\nmagnetic field component Bs of ~40 nT. The cause of the second storm main phase\nwith a SYM-H intensity of -354 nT was a deepening of the sheath Bs to ~43 nT. A\nmagnetosonic wave (Mms ~0.6) compressed the sheath to a high magnetic field\nstrength of ~71 nT. Intensified Bs of ~48 nT was the cause of the third and\nmost intense storm main phase with a SYM-H intensity of -518 nT. Three magnetic\ncloud events with Bs fields of ~25-40 nT occurred in the storm recovery phase,\nlengthening the recovery to ~2.8 days. At geosynchronous orbit, ~76 keV to ~1.5\nMeV electrons exhibited ~1-3 orders of magnitude flux decreases following the\nshock/sheath impingement onto the magnetosphere. The cosmic ray decreases at\nDome C, Antarctica (effective vertical cutoff rigidity <0.01 GV) and Oulu,\nFinland (rigidity ~0.8 GV) were ~17% and ~11%, respectively relative to quite\ntime values. Strong ionospheric current flows resulted in extreme\ngeomagnetically induced currents of ~30-40 A in the sub-auroral region. The\nstorm period is characterized by strong polar region field-aligned currents,\nwith ~10 times intensification during the main phase, and equatorward expansion\ndown to ~50 deg geomagnetic (altitude-adjusted) latitude.","PeriodicalId":501423,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Space Physics","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Space Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.14799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The recent superstorm of 2024 May 10-11 is the second largest geomagnetic
storm in the space age and the only one that has simultaneous interplanetary
data (there were no interplanetary data for the 1989 March storm). The May
superstorm was characterized by a sudden impulse (SI+) amplitude of +88 nT,
followed by a three-step storm main phase development which had a total
duration of ~9 hr. The cause of the first storm main phase with a peak SYM-H
intensity of -183 nT was a fast forward interplanetary shock (magnetosonic Mach
number Mms ~7.2) and an interplanetary sheath with southward interplanetary
magnetic field component Bs of ~40 nT. The cause of the second storm main phase
with a SYM-H intensity of -354 nT was a deepening of the sheath Bs to ~43 nT. A
magnetosonic wave (Mms ~0.6) compressed the sheath to a high magnetic field
strength of ~71 nT. Intensified Bs of ~48 nT was the cause of the third and
most intense storm main phase with a SYM-H intensity of -518 nT. Three magnetic
cloud events with Bs fields of ~25-40 nT occurred in the storm recovery phase,
lengthening the recovery to ~2.8 days. At geosynchronous orbit, ~76 keV to ~1.5
MeV electrons exhibited ~1-3 orders of magnitude flux decreases following the
shock/sheath impingement onto the magnetosphere. The cosmic ray decreases at
Dome C, Antarctica (effective vertical cutoff rigidity <0.01 GV) and Oulu,
Finland (rigidity ~0.8 GV) were ~17% and ~11%, respectively relative to quite
time values. Strong ionospheric current flows resulted in extreme
geomagnetically induced currents of ~30-40 A in the sub-auroral region. The
storm period is characterized by strong polar region field-aligned currents,
with ~10 times intensification during the main phase, and equatorward expansion
down to ~50 deg geomagnetic (altitude-adjusted) latitude.