First-Trimester Cell-Free DNA Fetal Fraction and Birth Weight in Twin Pregnancies.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY American journal of perinatology Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1055/a-2413-2353
Molly Siegel,Kaitlyn James,Bryann Bromley,Nathanael Koelper,Stephen T Chasen,Laurie B Griffin,Ashley S Roman,Meghana Limaye,Angela Clare Ranzini,Caitlin M Clifford,Joseph Biggio,Akila Subramaniam,Angela Rose Seasely,Jessica Page,Sara Nicholas,Jay Idler,Rashmi Rao,R Shree,Graham McLennan,Lorraine Dugoff
{"title":"First-Trimester Cell-Free DNA Fetal Fraction and Birth Weight in Twin Pregnancies.","authors":"Molly Siegel,Kaitlyn James,Bryann Bromley,Nathanael Koelper,Stephen T Chasen,Laurie B Griffin,Ashley S Roman,Meghana Limaye,Angela Clare Ranzini,Caitlin M Clifford,Joseph Biggio,Akila Subramaniam,Angela Rose Seasely,Jessica Page,Sara Nicholas,Jay Idler,Rashmi Rao,R Shree,Graham McLennan,Lorraine Dugoff","doi":"10.1055/a-2413-2353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nThe relationship between fetal fraction and birth weight in twin gestations is poorly understood.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nTo investigate the relationship between first trimester cfDNA fetal fraction and birth weight < 10th percentile in twin gestations.\r\n\r\nSTUDY DESIGN\r\nThis is a planned secondary analysis of the Twin cfDNA Study, a 17-center retrospective cohort of twin pregnancies screened for aneuploidy using cfDNA in the first trimester from 12/2011 - 2/2022, excluding those with positive screen results for chromosomal aneuploidy. CfDNA testing was performed by a single lab using massively parallel sequencing (MPSS). Baseline characteristics and birth weight of pregnancies with normal fetal fraction were compared to those with low (<5%) and high (>95%) fetal fraction using univariable analyses and multivariable regression.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA total of 1041 twin pregnancies were included. Chronic hypertension, elevated BMI, and self-identified Black race were associated with fetal fraction <5th percentile. There was no difference in median fetal fraction between those with birth weight <10th percentile in at least one twin (median [IQR] fetal fraction 12.2% [9.8, 14.8] versus those with normal birth weight (10th percentile) in both twins (median [IQR] fetal fraction 12.3% [9.7, 15.2] for normal birth weight, p = 0.49). There was no association between high or low fetal fraction and birth weight <10th percentile for one (p=0.45) or both (p=0.81) twins, and there was no association between high or low fetal fraction and birth weight <5th percentile for one (p=0.44) or both (p=0.74) twins. The results were unchanged after adjustment for potential confounders.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nIn this large cohort, there was no association between the extremes of cfDNA fetal fraction and birthweight < 10th percentile, suggesting that first trimester fetal fraction may not predict impaired fetal growth in twin gestations.","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2413-2353","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND The relationship between fetal fraction and birth weight in twin gestations is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE To investigate the relationship between first trimester cfDNA fetal fraction and birth weight < 10th percentile in twin gestations. STUDY DESIGN This is a planned secondary analysis of the Twin cfDNA Study, a 17-center retrospective cohort of twin pregnancies screened for aneuploidy using cfDNA in the first trimester from 12/2011 - 2/2022, excluding those with positive screen results for chromosomal aneuploidy. CfDNA testing was performed by a single lab using massively parallel sequencing (MPSS). Baseline characteristics and birth weight of pregnancies with normal fetal fraction were compared to those with low (<5%) and high (>95%) fetal fraction using univariable analyses and multivariable regression. RESULTS A total of 1041 twin pregnancies were included. Chronic hypertension, elevated BMI, and self-identified Black race were associated with fetal fraction <5th percentile. There was no difference in median fetal fraction between those with birth weight <10th percentile in at least one twin (median [IQR] fetal fraction 12.2% [9.8, 14.8] versus those with normal birth weight (10th percentile) in both twins (median [IQR] fetal fraction 12.3% [9.7, 15.2] for normal birth weight, p = 0.49). There was no association between high or low fetal fraction and birth weight <10th percentile for one (p=0.45) or both (p=0.81) twins, and there was no association between high or low fetal fraction and birth weight <5th percentile for one (p=0.44) or both (p=0.74) twins. The results were unchanged after adjustment for potential confounders. CONCLUSION In this large cohort, there was no association between the extremes of cfDNA fetal fraction and birthweight < 10th percentile, suggesting that first trimester fetal fraction may not predict impaired fetal growth in twin gestations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双胎妊娠第一胎无细胞 DNA 胎儿比例和出生体重
背景双胎妊娠中胎儿组分与出生体重之间的关系尚不清楚。目的研究双胎妊娠头三个月cfDNA胎儿组分与出生体重<10百分位数之间的关系。该研究是一项由 17 个中心组成的回顾性队列,研究对象为 2011 年 12 月至 2022 年 2 月期间,在妊娠头三个月使用 cfDNA 进行非整倍体筛查的双胎妊娠,但不包括染色体非整倍体筛查结果呈阳性的双胎妊娠。CfDNA 检测由一家实验室使用大规模平行测序(MPSS)技术进行。通过单变量分析和多变量回归,比较了胎儿分数正常孕妇与胎儿分数低(95%)孕妇的基线特征和出生体重。慢性高血压、体重指数(BMI)升高和自认为的黑人种族与胎儿分数小于第 5 百分位数有关。至少一对双胞胎中出生体重<10百分位数(中位数[IQR]胎儿分数为12.2% [9.8, 14.8])与两对双胞胎中出生体重正常(10th percentile)(出生体重正常的中位数[IQR]胎儿分数为12.3% [9.7, 15.2],P = 0.49)的胎儿分数中位数没有差异。其中一名(p=0.45)或两对(p=0.81)双胞胎的胎儿分数过高或过低与出生体重<10百分位数无关联,其中一名(p=0.44)或两对(p=0.74)双胞胎的胎儿分数过高或过低与出生体重<5百分位数无关联。结论 在这一大型队列中,cfDNA胎儿组分的极端值与出生体重<第10百分位数之间没有关联,这表明前三个月的胎儿组分可能无法预测双胎妊娠中胎儿发育受损的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
期刊最新文献
A Description of IVIG Use in Term Neonates with ABO Incompatibility. Early-Pregnancy Resilience Characteristics before versus during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Infant Mortality Categorized by Birth Weight Percentiles for Deliveries between 22 and 28 Weeks of Gestation. Are Racial Disparities in Cesarean Due to Differences in Labor Induction Management? Factors Associated with the Uptake of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception and Contraceptive Use in Postpartum People with HIV at a Single Tertiary Care Center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1