Historical Perspectives on the Evolution of Spino-Pelvic Fixation and its Implications on Clinical Care A Narrative Review.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Global Spine Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1177/21925682241283726
Alexander von Glinski,Emre Yilmaz,Periklis Godolias,Lorin Benneker,F C Oner,Frank Kandziora,Gregory Schroeder,Klaus Schnake,Marcel Dvorak,Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran,Mohammad El-Sharkawi,Alexander Vaccaro,Richard Bransford,Thomas A Schildhauer,Jens R Chapman
{"title":"Historical Perspectives on the Evolution of Spino-Pelvic Fixation and its Implications on Clinical Care A Narrative Review.","authors":"Alexander von Glinski,Emre Yilmaz,Periklis Godolias,Lorin Benneker,F C Oner,Frank Kandziora,Gregory Schroeder,Klaus Schnake,Marcel Dvorak,Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran,Mohammad El-Sharkawi,Alexander Vaccaro,Richard Bransford,Thomas A Schildhauer,Jens R Chapman","doi":"10.1177/21925682241283726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"STUDY DESIGN\r\nBroad narrative review.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVES\r\nTo review and summarize the evolution of spinopelvic fixation (SPF) and its implications on clinical care.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA thorough review of peer-reviewed literature was performed on the historical evolution of sacropelvic fixation techniques and their respective advantages and disadvantages.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe sacropelvic junction has been a long-standing challenge due to a combination of anatomic idiosyncrasies and very high biomechanical forces. While first approaches of fusion were determinated by many material and surgical technique-related limitations, the modern idea of stabilization of the lumbosacral junction was largely initiated by the inclusion of the ilium into lumbosacral fusion. While there is a wide spectrum of indications for SPF the chosen technique remains is defined by the individual pathology and surgeons' preference.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nBy a constant evolution of both instrumentation hardware and surgical technique better fusion rates paired with improved clinical results could be achieved.","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":"9 1","pages":"21925682241283726"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241283726","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN Broad narrative review. OBJECTIVES To review and summarize the evolution of spinopelvic fixation (SPF) and its implications on clinical care. METHODS A thorough review of peer-reviewed literature was performed on the historical evolution of sacropelvic fixation techniques and their respective advantages and disadvantages. RESULTS The sacropelvic junction has been a long-standing challenge due to a combination of anatomic idiosyncrasies and very high biomechanical forces. While first approaches of fusion were determinated by many material and surgical technique-related limitations, the modern idea of stabilization of the lumbosacral junction was largely initiated by the inclusion of the ilium into lumbosacral fusion. While there is a wide spectrum of indications for SPF the chosen technique remains is defined by the individual pathology and surgeons' preference. CONCLUSION By a constant evolution of both instrumentation hardware and surgical technique better fusion rates paired with improved clinical results could be achieved.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脊柱骨盆固定术演变的历史视角及其对临床护理的影响叙事回顾。
研究设计广泛的叙述性综述.Objectivesto review and summarize the evolution of spinopelvic fixation (SPF) and its implications on clinical care.MethodSA就骶骨固定技术的历史演变及其各自的优缺点对同行评议的文献进行了全面的综述.Result骶骨交界处由于解剖学特异性和极高的生物力学力的共同作用,长期以来一直是一个难题。最初的融合方法受到许多材料和手术技术方面的限制,而现代的腰骶部融合方法主要是通过将髂骨纳入腰骶部融合术来实现腰骶部交界处的稳定。虽然 SPF 的适应症范围很广,但所选择的技术仍取决于个体病理和外科医生的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
期刊最新文献
Opioid Use in Opioid Naive Patients After Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery. High-Speed Instance Segmentation for Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Multicenter Validation and Inference Speed Evaluation. Sensitivity of the Pooled Surgical Site Infection Estimate to Study Design in a Meta-analysis of Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Spine Surgery. Response to the Letter to the Editor on "Role of Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Reducing Surgical-Site Infections in Spine Surgery - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis". A Novel MRI-Based Lumbar Subcutaneous Adipose Classification for Predicting Surgical Site Infection and Adverse Events after Lumbar Fusion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1