Capacity reinstatement of reinforced concrete one-way ribbed slabs with rib-cutting shear zone openings: Hybrid fiber reinforced polymer/steel technique

IF 2.1 4区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Advances in Structural Engineering Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI:10.1177/13694332241276060
Hussein Elsanadedy, Amjad Al Kallas, Husain Abbas, Tarek Almusallam, Yousef Al-Salloum
{"title":"Capacity reinstatement of reinforced concrete one-way ribbed slabs with rib-cutting shear zone openings: Hybrid fiber reinforced polymer/steel technique","authors":"Hussein Elsanadedy, Amjad Al Kallas, Husain Abbas, Tarek Almusallam, Yousef Al-Salloum","doi":"10.1177/13694332241276060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the use of two configurations for capacity restoration of reinforced concrete (RC) one-way ribbed slabs containing openings in shear zones. Four specimens of half-scale comprised three ribs in addition to a top RC slab. The test plan included a control specimen without openings, one with two rib-cutting shear openings, one strengthened using a blend of carbon FRP (CFRP) composites and steel plates, and another retrofitted with a combination of glass FRP (GFRP) composites and steel plates. The two strengthening schemes were found successful at fully restoring the ultimate load of the specimens. The ultimate load of specimen strengthened using the hybrid CFRP/steel system exceeded the control slab without openings by 52%. However, in the other specimen where a mix of steel plates and GFRP sheets was used, the load capacity was only 5% less than the control specimen without openings. While the dissipated energy and stiffness were reinstated and improved for the hybrid CFRP/steel system, they were partially restored for the GFRP/steel system. Additionally, a prediction approach was developed to estimate the maximum load of the slabs. The developed approach considered potential shear and flexural modes of failure, providing close predictions of the ultimate load.","PeriodicalId":50849,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Structural Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Structural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13694332241276060","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the use of two configurations for capacity restoration of reinforced concrete (RC) one-way ribbed slabs containing openings in shear zones. Four specimens of half-scale comprised three ribs in addition to a top RC slab. The test plan included a control specimen without openings, one with two rib-cutting shear openings, one strengthened using a blend of carbon FRP (CFRP) composites and steel plates, and another retrofitted with a combination of glass FRP (GFRP) composites and steel plates. The two strengthening schemes were found successful at fully restoring the ultimate load of the specimens. The ultimate load of specimen strengthened using the hybrid CFRP/steel system exceeded the control slab without openings by 52%. However, in the other specimen where a mix of steel plates and GFRP sheets was used, the load capacity was only 5% less than the control specimen without openings. While the dissipated energy and stiffness were reinstated and improved for the hybrid CFRP/steel system, they were partially restored for the GFRP/steel system. Additionally, a prediction approach was developed to estimate the maximum load of the slabs. The developed approach considered potential shear and flexural modes of failure, providing close predictions of the ultimate load.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
带切肋剪力区开口的钢筋混凝土单向肋板的承载力恢复:纤维增强聚合物/钢混合技术
本研究考察了使用两种配置来恢复剪切区中含有开口的钢筋混凝土(RC)单向肋板的承载力。四个半比例试样由三根肋条和一个顶部 RC 板组成。测试计划包括一个不带开口的对照试样、一个带两个切肋剪切开口的试样、一个使用碳玻璃纤维增强塑料(CFRP)复合材料和钢板混合加固的试样,以及另一个使用玻璃纤维增强塑料(GFRP)复合材料和钢板组合加固的试样。这两种加固方案都成功地完全恢复了试样的极限荷载。使用混合 CFRP/ 钢系统加固的试样的极限荷载比没有开口的对照板高出 52%。然而,在另一个混合使用钢板和 GFRP 片材的试样中,承载能力仅比无开口的对照试样低 5%。CFRP/ 钢混合系统的耗散能量和刚度得到了恢复和改善,而 GFRP/ 钢系统的耗散能量和刚度则得到了部分恢复。此外,还开发了一种预测方法来估算楼板的最大荷载。所开发的方法考虑了潜在的剪切和挠曲失效模式,提供了接近极限荷载的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Structural Engineering
Advances in Structural Engineering 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
230
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Advances in Structural Engineering was established in 1997 and has become one of the major peer-reviewed journals in the field of structural engineering. To better fulfil the mission of the journal, we have recently decided to launch two new features for the journal: (a) invited review papers providing an in-depth exposition of a topic of significant current interest; (b) short papers reporting truly new technologies in structural engineering.
期刊最新文献
Multi-experimental seismic analysis of low-rise thin reinforced concrete wall building with unconnected elastomeric isolators using real-time hybrid simulations Prediction and optimization framework of shear strength of reinforced concrete flanged shear wall based on machine learning and non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II Deep learning-based minute-scale digital prediction model for temperature induced deflection of a multi-tower double-layer steel truss bridge Experimental investigation on shear behavior of double-row perforated GFRP rib connectors in FRP-concrete hybrid beams Seismic response prediction method of train-bridge coupled system based on convolutional neural network-bidirectional long short-term memory-attention modeling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1