Classification of Patients Based on Dyspnea and Desaturation During Exercise in Interstitial Lung Disease.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Respiratory care Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.4187/respcare.11712
Kohei Otake,Shogo Misu,Akio Yamamoto,Takumi Yamaguchi,Chisato Nagatani,Hideki Sakai,Masahiro Kaneko,Akira Ishikawa,Hiromi Tomioka
{"title":"Classification of Patients Based on Dyspnea and Desaturation During Exercise in Interstitial Lung Disease.","authors":"Kohei Otake,Shogo Misu,Akio Yamamoto,Takumi Yamaguchi,Chisato Nagatani,Hideki Sakai,Masahiro Kaneko,Akira Ishikawa,Hiromi Tomioka","doi":"10.4187/respcare.11712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nDyspnea and desaturation during exercise are essential assessment items for pulmonary rehabilitation. Characterizing patients using these 2 factors may be important for providing more effective pulmonary rehabilitation. This study aimed to categorize subjects with interstitial lung disease (ILD) using dyspnea and desaturation at the end of the 6-min walk test (6MWT).\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis was a retrospective study including 230 stable subjects with ILD who underwent 6MWT in our out-patient department at a general hospital in Japan. The modified Borg scale and oxygen saturation determined by SpO2 at the end of the 6MWT were used for cluster analysis using the k-means method with k = 4.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nSubjects were classified into 4 characteristic clusters. SpO2 at the end of the 6MWT was lower in cluster 4 (80.5 ± 3.0%) than in clusters 1 (94.3 ± 2.0%), 2 (94.3 ± 1.9%), and 3 (87.9 ± 1.8%) and was lower in cluster 3 than in clusters 1 and 2. The modified Borg scale score at the end of the 6MWT was higher in clusters 2 (4 [3-8]), 3 (3 [0-9]), and 4 (4 [0-7]) than in cluster 1 (0.5 [0-2.0]) and was higher in cluster 2 than in cluster 3.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nSubjects with ILD were classified into 4 characteristic clusters using dyspnea and SpO2 at the end of the 6MWT. The 4 clusters are characterized as follows: Cluster 1 had mild desaturation and mild dyspnea; cluster 2 had mild desaturation and severe dyspnea; cluster 3 had both moderate desaturation and dyspnea, and cluster 4 had both severe desaturation and dyspnea. These classification data offer insight for individualized pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with ILD.","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.11712","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Dyspnea and desaturation during exercise are essential assessment items for pulmonary rehabilitation. Characterizing patients using these 2 factors may be important for providing more effective pulmonary rehabilitation. This study aimed to categorize subjects with interstitial lung disease (ILD) using dyspnea and desaturation at the end of the 6-min walk test (6MWT). METHODS This was a retrospective study including 230 stable subjects with ILD who underwent 6MWT in our out-patient department at a general hospital in Japan. The modified Borg scale and oxygen saturation determined by SpO2 at the end of the 6MWT were used for cluster analysis using the k-means method with k = 4. RESULTS Subjects were classified into 4 characteristic clusters. SpO2 at the end of the 6MWT was lower in cluster 4 (80.5 ± 3.0%) than in clusters 1 (94.3 ± 2.0%), 2 (94.3 ± 1.9%), and 3 (87.9 ± 1.8%) and was lower in cluster 3 than in clusters 1 and 2. The modified Borg scale score at the end of the 6MWT was higher in clusters 2 (4 [3-8]), 3 (3 [0-9]), and 4 (4 [0-7]) than in cluster 1 (0.5 [0-2.0]) and was higher in cluster 2 than in cluster 3. CONCLUSIONS Subjects with ILD were classified into 4 characteristic clusters using dyspnea and SpO2 at the end of the 6MWT. The 4 clusters are characterized as follows: Cluster 1 had mild desaturation and mild dyspnea; cluster 2 had mild desaturation and severe dyspnea; cluster 3 had both moderate desaturation and dyspnea, and cluster 4 had both severe desaturation and dyspnea. These classification data offer insight for individualized pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with ILD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据间质性肺病患者运动时的呼吸困难和不饱和度对患者进行分类。
背景呼吸困难和运动时不饱和是肺康复的基本评估项目。利用这两个因素对患者进行特征描述可能对提供更有效的肺康复治疗非常重要。本研究旨在利用 6 分钟步行测试(6MWT)结束时的呼吸困难和饱和度降低对间质性肺病(ILD)患者进行分类。采用 k-means 方法(k = 4)对改良博格量表和 6MWT 结束时通过 SpO2 测定的血氧饱和度进行聚类分析。第 4 组 6MWT 结束时的 SpO2(80.5 ± 3.0%)低于第 1 组(94.3 ± 2.0%)、第 2 组(94.3 ± 1.9%)和第 3 组(87.9 ± 1.8%),第 3 组低于第 1 组和第 2 组。6MWT 结束时的改良博格量表评分,第 2 组(4 [3-8])、第 3 组(3 [0-9])和第 4 组(4 [0-7])高于第 1 组(0.5 [0-2.0]),第 2 组高于第 3 组。这 4 个组群的特征如下:第 1 组有轻度饱和度和轻度呼吸困难;第 2 组有轻度饱和度和重度呼吸困难;第 3 组有中度饱和度和呼吸困难;第 4 组有重度饱和度和呼吸困难。这些分类数据为 ILD 患者的个体化肺康复提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory care
Respiratory care 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.
期刊最新文献
Effects of Positive Expiratory Pressure Device on Gas Exchange, Atelectasis, Hemodynamics, and Dyspnea in Spontaneously Breathing Critically Ill Subjects. Respiratory Therapy Leaders' Perceptions of Value of Respiratory Care Services. Ventilation Monitoring Using a Noninvasive Bioelectrical Impedance Device in Critically Ill Children. Effect of Continuous Lateral Rotation Therapy on Clinical Outcomes in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Adults. Maintenance Inhalers for Asthma and COPD in Spain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1